Request PowerPoint
PowerPoint animations are preserved in the original file.
Slide index (71)
- Loading slide titles…
Loading presentation…
Slide text will appear here when the presentation loads.
Swipe on touchscreens · Use ← / → to change slides, Home / End to jump.
Lecture topics
- Type IV hypersensitivity: The cellular arm
- IFN-γ reinforces Th1 development
- TNF and IL-1 convert activation into inflammation
- The tuberculin reaction has a characteristic course
- Granulomatous inflammation has diverse triggers
- Selected disorders associated with Th1 / Th17 pathways
- Interpreting a suspected cellular hypersensitivity lesion
- Primary reference
Slide index & full transcript (71 slides)
Text from the original slides, in presentation order. Diagrams and images remain in the viewer above.
Slide 1 · CD4+ T Cell–Mediated Inflammation
Type IV hypersensitivity · mechanisms · morphology · clinical examples
Dr Abu Suraih Sakhri
MBBS, MD (Pathology)
www.abusuraihsakhri.com
Slide 2 · Learning objectives
Explain how antigen-specific CD4+ T cells generate delayed inflammatory injury.
Compare Th1–macrophage and Th17–neutrophil pathways.
Recognize the time course and morphology of delayed-type hypersensitivity.
Relate contact dermatitis, granulomas, and selected diseases to mechanism.
Distinguish cytokine-driven inflammation from CD8+ cytotoxicity.
Antigen recognition
CD4+ Th1 / Th17 responses
Inflammatory leukocytes
Tissue injury
Slide 3 · Type IV hypersensitivity: The cellular arm
Cell-mediated hypersensitivity is driven mainly by cytokines from CD4+ T lymphocytes.
The resulting inflammation may be chronic and destructive.
CD8+ cytotoxicity is a distinct, sometimes coexisting, mechanism.
Tissue antigen
CD4+ effector cell
Cytokines
Inflammation / injury
Slide 4 · Prior sensitization is essential to classic DTH
An initial antigen encounter generates differentiated and memory T cells.
A subsequent tissue antigen challenge engages antigen-specific effector responses.
The visible reaction follows cellular recruitment and activation.
Initial encounter
Effector / memory pool
Repeat antigen
Tissue inflammation
Slide 5 · Why the reaction is delayed
0 h
Challenge
24–48 h
Detectable response
Later
Resolution / persistence
DTH is distinct from immediate hypersensitivity in its kinetics. • A cutaneous reaction becomes detectable after approximately 24–48 hours. • Timing reflects the cellular inflammatory response to antigen challenge.
Slide 6 · Two ways T cells injure tissues
CD4+ inflammation
CD8+ cell killing
Cytokines recruit and activate leukocytes
Recognized target cells are directly injured
Slide 7 · Three stages of CD4+ inflammatory injury
Antigen presentation + CD4+ activation
Effector Th1 / Th17 differentiation
Phagocyte recruitment / activation
Inflammation and tissue injury
The pathogenesis follows a causal sequence from recognition to tissue effect.
Slide 8 · Dendritic cells initiate antigen-specific activation
Naive CD4+ T cells recognize antigen-derived peptides displayed by dendritic cells.
The antigen-presenting cell supplies the context for clonal activation.
The primed population can later respond in tissue.
Dendritic cell + peptide
Naive CD4+ T cell
Activated clone
Slide 9 · Costimulation accompanies antigen recognition
Antigen recognition is the first activation signal.
B7 proteins (CD80/CD86) on antigen-presenting cells engage CD28 on naive T cells.
Antigen and costimulation cooperate in the initiating response.
MHC–peptide → TCR
B7 → CD28
CD4+ activation
Slide 10 · IL-2 expands the responsive T-cell clone
Antigen-stimulated CD4+ cell
IL-2 secretion / IL-2 receptor
Autocrine proliferation
Expanded antigen-specific pool
Activated CD4+ cells secrete IL-2 and express its high-affinity receptor.
IL-2 functions as an autocrine proliferation signal.
Clonal expansion increases the number of antigen-responsive cells.
Slide 11 · The APC cytokine milieu guides differentiation
Antigen-stimulated CD4+ T cell
IL-12 → Th1
IL-1 + IL-6 + IL-23 → Th17
The pattern of cytokines at initial activation helps determine helper-T-cell fate. Th1 and Th17 populations subsequently produce distinct inflammatory responses.
Slide 12 · IL-12 programs the Th1 pathway
Dendritic cells and macrophages can supply IL-12.
IL-12 induces differentiation toward the Th1 subset.
Th1 cells are linked to macrophage-dominant inflammatory injury.
APC / macrophage
IL-12
Th1 effector cell
Slide 13 · IFN-γ reinforces Th1 development
IL-12–driven Th1
IFN-γ
More Th1 differentiation
Amplified inflammatory response
Effector Th1 cells produce interferon-γ (IFN-γ).
IFN-γ promotes further Th1 development and amplifies the reaction.
It is also the principal macrophage-activating effector cytokine.
Slide 14 · IL-1, IL-6, and IL-23 support Th17 differentiation
Activated antigen-presenting cells produce inflammatory cytokines.
IL-1, IL-6, and IL-23 promote the Th17 pathway.
Th17 responses preferentially recruit neutrophils and monocytes.
Inflammatory APC
IL-1 · IL-6 · IL-23
Th17 effector cell
Slide 15 · Th1 and Th17 have different effector signatures
Feature
Th1 response
Th17 response
Inducing cytokines
IL-12
IL-1, IL-6, IL-23
Principal effector signals
IFN-γ
IL-17, IL-22, chemokines
Dominant recruited / activated cells
Activated macrophages
Neutrophils and monocytes
Common tissue pattern
Macrophage-rich inflammation
Neutrophil-rich component
Slide 16 · Memory cells enable rapid recall responses
Some differentiated T cells enter the circulation.
They become part of long-lived memory T-cell populations.
Persistent immune memory explains reactions to a later antigen encounter.
Differentiated effector cells
Circulation / memory pool
Repeat antigen
Slide 17 · Effector-phase responses require antigen re-exposure
Repeat tissue antigen
Memory / effector Th cell
Cytokine release
Inflammatory leukocytes
A primed Th1 or Th17 cell encounters its target antigen again.
Local cytokine production triggers inflammatory-cell recruitment.
The downstream phagocytes are major effectors of tissue injury.
Slide 18 · IFN-γ is the central Th1 effector signal
On repeat antigen encounter, Th1 cells produce IFN-γ.
IFN-γ produces the characteristic activated-macrophage response.
Sustained activation can turn a protective response into tissue injury.
Activated Th1
IFN-γ
Classically activated macrophage
Slide 19 · Classical macrophage activation changes cell function
IFN-γ signal
Macrophage activation
Microbe killing + antigen display
Cytokines + chemokines
IFN-γ induces a broad macrophage activation program.
Antimicrobial activity, antigen presentation, and inflammatory output all increase.
Slide 20 · Activated macrophages increase microbicidal activity
Macrophages acquire greater capacity to phagocytose microbes.
Their ability to kill ingested microorganisms is augmented.
This response is beneficial when the antigen is a persistent intracellular microbe.
Macrophage activation
↑ Phagocytosis
↑ Microbial killing
Slide 21 · Macrophage MHC II expression amplifies recognition
IFN-γ–activated macrophages express more MHC class II molecules.
Increased peptide display enhances interaction with helper T cells.
The macrophage becomes a stronger antigen-presenting participant.
Activated macrophage
↑ MHC class II
Enhanced T-cell interaction
Slide 22 · TNF and IL-1 convert activation into inflammation
Activated macrophages secrete TNF and IL-1.
These mediators promote local inflammatory changes.
Their continued production contributes to the damaging reaction.
IFN-γ–activated macrophage
TNF + IL-1
Inflammation
Slide 23 · Chemokines increase inflammatory-cell recruitment
Classically activated macrophages produce chemokines.
Chemokine-dependent recruitment expands the local infiltrate.
The recruited cells sustain the cytokine-driven lesion.
Macrophage chemokines
Leukocyte recruitment
Amplified infiltrate
Slide 24 · Macrophage IL-12 creates a reinforcing loop
Macrophage IL-12
Th1 activation
IFN-γ secretion
Macrophage activation
Activated macrophages can produce additional IL-12.
IL-12 supports the Th1 population that makes IFN-γ.
This positive-feedback architecture explains persistent activity.
Slide 25 · When host defense becomes tissue damage
Containment / defense
Persistence / pathology
Phagocytes eliminate the offending antigen
Antigen or stimulation persists
Macrophage activation supports microbial killing
Continued activation sustains inflammation
Response subsides when the trigger resolves
Repeated cytokine release injures tissue
Slide 26 · Th17 cells deploy IL-17 and IL-22
Activated Th17 cells secrete IL-17 and IL-22.
They also produce chemokines and additional cytokines.
Their combined output organizes a leukocyte-rich inflammatory reaction.
Th17 cell
IL-17 · IL-22
Chemokines
Slide 27 · Th17 responses recruit neutrophils and monocytes
Activated Th17
IL-17 / IL-22 / chemokines
Neutrophils + monocytes
Inflammatory tissue response
Th17-associated cytokines mobilize inflammatory leukocytes.
Neutrophils are a more prominent component than in classic Th1 responses.
Monocytes also enter the inflammatory tissue.
Slide 28 · Predict infiltrate composition from T-cell pathway
Feature
Th1-dominant
Th17-dominant
Key Th-cell cytokine
IFN-γ
IL-17 / IL-22
Characteristic phagocyte
Activated macrophage
Neutrophil, plus monocyte
Typical pathologic emphasis
Macrophage-rich inflammation
More prominent neutrophil component
Key diagnostic consideration:
Responses may coexist
Responses may coexist
Slide 29 · A unified map of CD4+ inflammatory injury
Antigen recognition
Th1 / Th17 cytokines
Inflammatory phagocytes
Tissue injury
Cytokines connect antigen-specific CD4+ cells to tissue injury.
The principal route differs by the Th1 or Th17 effector program.
Slide 30 · DTH: A recall reaction in previously immunized skin
Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) is the classic model of CD4+ inflammation.
Antigen is introduced into skin of a sensitized individual.
The response develops over hours rather than immediately.
Previously sensitized host
Skin antigen challenge
Local delayed inflammation
Slide 31 · Tuberculin is an antigenic recall challenge
Purified protein derivative (PPD; Tuberculin) contains antigen from the tubercle bacillus.
An intradermal challenge elicits DTH in a previously sensitized individual.
The reaction illustrates a local, antigen-specific inflammatory memory response.
PPD introduced into skin
Primed T-cell recognition
Induration / erythema
Slide 32 · The tuberculin reaction has a characteristic course
8–12 h
Onset
24–72 h
Peak response
Thereafter
Gradual resolution
Redness and induration begin after about 8–12 hours. • The response peaks around 24–72 hours. • The local lesion then gradually subsides.
Slide 33 · DTH morphology: Perivascular mononuclear cuffing
CD4+ lymphocytes and macrophages collect around dermal venules.
Their perivascular aggregation produces a cuff-like infiltrate.
This is the classic microscopic pattern of the cellular reaction.
Venule
Perivascular mononuclear cuff
Schematic — not a histologic specimen
Slide 34 · Endothelial hypertrophy accompanies activation
Fully developed DTH lesions show hypertrophic venular endothelial cells.
The change reflects cytokine-mediated endothelial activation.
It accompanies the surrounding inflammatory-cell accumulation.
Venule
Perivascular mononuclear cuff
Schematic — not a histologic specimen
Slide 35 · Dermal edema and fibrin support the tissue reaction
The textbook DTH example includes dermal edema.
Fibrin deposition can accompany the perivascular mononuclear infiltrate.
These associated findings add context to the vascular-centered pattern.
Venule
Perivascular mononuclear cuff
Schematic — not a histologic specimen
Slide 36 · Anti-CD4 staining identifies the T-cell component
The illustrated source lesion contains a predominantly perivascular CD4-positive infiltrate.
Immunoperoxidase staining localizes the helper-T-cell component.
CD4 labeling supports cellular identity; It does not by itself establish the antigen.
Perivascular inflammatory cells
Anti-CD4 immunostain
CD4+ lymphocyte component
Slide 37 · Transient DTH versus sustained antigenic stimulation
Short-lived recall response
Persistent tissue stimulus
Cellular response peaks then subsides
Inflammation remains active
Perivascular T cells and macrophages
Macrophages increasingly predominate
Prototype: Tuberculin skin reaction
Possible progression to granulomatous inflammation
Slide 38 · Persistent antigens alter the cellular infiltrate
Exposure
Antigen persists
2–3 weeks
Macrophage dominance
Chronic
Granuloma
Indigestible or persisting antigens can maintain the response. • Macrophages become dominant over approximately 2–3 weeks. • The chronic response can organize into granulomas.
Slide 39 · Epithelioid cells are transformed macrophages
Sustained activation changes macrophage morphology.
They become larger, with abundant cytoplasm: Epithelioid cells.
Epithelioid transformation is a component of the granulomatous response.
Sustained stimulation
Activated macrophage
Epithelioid cell
Slide 40 · Granulomas organize macrophages and lymphocytes
Epithelioid macrophages form circumscribed cellular aggregates.
Lymphocytes commonly surround the activated macrophage core.
Such aggregates can form small visible granule-like nodules.
Epithelioid macrophage aggregate
Schematic — not a histologic specimen
Slide 41 · Strong Th1 activity favors immune granulomas
Persistent antigen
Th1 IFN-γ
Activated / epithelioid macrophages
Granuloma
Persistent antigen maintains helper-T-cell activation.
IFN-γ promotes sustained macrophage activation.
Aggregated activated macrophages characterize granulomatous inflammation.
Slide 42 · Granulomatous inflammation has diverse triggers
Trigger
Adaptive helper-T-cell context
Inflammatory character
Persistent mycobacterial antigen
Strong Th1 / IFN-γ response
Macrophage / epithelioid-rich
Indigestible foreign body
Adaptive T-cell response not required
Direct macrophage response
Schistosome eggs
Strong Th2 response
Eosinophil-rich granulomas
Slide 43 · Foreign bodies can produce nonimmune granulomas
An indigestible foreign material can activate macrophages.
Granuloma formation in this setting need not require adaptive immunity.
Thus, granuloma morphology alone does not establish a Th1 mechanism.
Indigestible foreign body
Macrophage recruitment
Granulomatous response
Slide 44 · Schistosomal eggs produce a different granuloma
Eggs deposited in tissues elicit granulomatous reactions.
The accompanying helper-T-cell response is commonly Th2-polarized.
Eosinophils are prominent in these granulomas.
Schistosome eggs
Th2 response
Eosinophil-rich granuloma
Slide 45 · Histology should be interpreted with mechanism
Observation
Potential explanation
Limit
Perivascular CD4+ mononuclear infiltrate
Delayed-type cellular inflammation
Antigen not identified by CD4 alone
Macrophage-rich epithelioid aggregate
Chronic / persistent activation
Foreign body or Th2 triggers possible
Prominent eosinophils in granuloma
Can accompany helminth-associated Th2 response
Not typical Th1-only pattern
Slide 46 · Contact sensitivity is an environmental DTH example
Poison ivy and poison oak contain urushiol, a trigger of contact sensitivity.
The clinical lesion is an itchy, vesicular dermatitis.
This is an example of delayed inflammatory skin injury.
Urushiol exposure
Antigenic modification
T-cell inflammation
Slide 47 · Small environmental chemicals can alter self proteins
Chemical contact
Modified self protein
T-cell recognition
Dermatitis
Environmental compounds may bind to self proteins and change their structure.
Peptides from modified proteins are then recognized by T cells.
The resulting response can damage the epidermis and dermis.
Slide 48 · Some chemicals alter HLA recognition directly
Certain chemicals can modify HLA molecules.
Altered HLA may appear foreign to T lymphocytes.
This is an alternative proposed route for chemical-elicited T-cell responses.
Chemical–HLA interaction
Altered T-cell recognition
Skin inflammation
Slide 49 · Drug reactions may use related T-cell mechanisms
Similar immunologic reactions account for many drug hypersensitivity presentations.
Skin rash is a common clinical manifestation.
A chemical–protein or HLA interaction is a possible initiating mechanism.
Drug-associated antigenic change
T-cell response
Cutaneous rash
Slide 50 · Contact dermatitis: Cause and morphology
Mechanism
Tissue manifestation
Urushiol or other chemical exposure
Pruritic skin eruption
Altered self proteins / possible altered HLA
T-cell mediated inflammatory response
Tissue inflammation and injury
Epidermal necrosis, dermal inflammation and blisters
Slide 51 · Three classic manifestations of CD4+ inflammation
Setting
Dominant lesson
Typical lesion
Tuberculin skin response
Antigen-specific delayed recall
Erythema / induration; Mononuclear cuffing
Persistent antigen
Chronic macrophage activation
Epithelioid granuloma
Contact sensitivity
Chemically modified antigenic target
Pruritic vesicular dermatitis
Slide 52 · Selected disorders associated with Th1 / Th17 pathways
Disease
Pathway noted
Tissue consequence
Rheumatoid arthritis
Th17; Possible Th1, antibody / complex roles
Chronic destructive arthritis
Multiple sclerosis
Th1 and Th17; Activated macrophages
Inflammatory CNS demyelination
Inflammatory bowel disease
Th1 and Th17
Chronic intestinal inflammation
Psoriasis
Mainly Th17 cytokines
Inflammatory skin plaques
Slide 53 · Rheumatoid arthritis: Multiple mechanisms may overlap
Th17 cytokines are implicated; A Th1 contribution is discussed as possible.
Antibodies and immune complexes may also contribute.
The resulting chronic synovial inflammation damages articular cartilage.
Joint-directed immune response
Th17 ± Th1 cytokines
Antibodies / immune complexes?
Chronic destructive arthritis
Slide 54 · Multiple sclerosis: Inflammation and myelin injury
The proposed pathogenic T-cell targets include myelin proteins.
Th1/Th17 cytokines and activated macrophages contribute to myelin destruction.
Consequences include inflammatory CNS demyelination and neurologic deficits.
Myelin-related antigens
Th1 / Th17 + macrophages
CNS demyelination
Slide 55 · Inflammatory bowel disease and commensal responses
Uncontrolled responses to enteric bacteria are implicated.
Th1 and Th17 cytokines participate in intestinal inflammation.
Sustained mucosal injury causes chronic intestinal pathology.
Enteric bacterial antigens
Th1 / Th17 response
Chronic intestinal inflammation
Slide 56 · Psoriasis: Prominent Th17 cytokine involvement
The source describes the pathogenic T-cell antigen as unknown.
Th17-derived cytokines are the principal emphasized inflammatory mechanism.
The clinical lesion consists of inflammatory plaques of skin.
Unknown antigenic trigger
Th17 cytokines
Cutaneous plaques
Slide 57 · Type 1 diabetes: Inflammation plus CTL cell killing
Pancreatic islet antigens are implicated in the T-cell response.
Insulitis denotes chronic inflammatory infiltration of the islets.
CD8+ CTL destruction of β cells is a major injury mechanism.
Pancreatic islet antigens
Chronic islet inflammation
CD8+ cytotoxic β-cell injury
Loss of β cells
Slide 58 · T-cell disease mechanisms are not all the same
Disease
Inflammatory component
Direct cytotoxic component
Rheumatoid arthritis
Th17 ± Th1 cytokines
Not primary mechanism in table
Multiple sclerosis
Th1 / Th17, macrophage injury
Not primary mechanism in table
Type 1 diabetes
Islet inflammation
CD8+ CTLs destroy β cells
Contact sensitivity
Th1 ± Th17 inflammatory injury
Not specified as primary in Table 6.5
Slide 59 · CD4+ inflammation versus CD8+ cytotoxicity
Criterion
CD4+ T-cell inflammation
CD8+ CTL injury
Main T-cell action
Secretion of inflammatory cytokines
Target-cell killing
Typical proximal effector
Macrophages / recruited leukocytes
Perforin- and granzyme-mediated apoptosis
Antigen context
Tissue antigens presented by APCs
Target antigen displayed by infected or altered cells
Dominant tissue effect
Inflammation and secondary injury
Loss of antigen-bearing target cells
Slide 60 · Type IV differs from antibody-mediated injury
Mechanism
Principal mediator
Common injury process
T-cell mediated (type IV)
CD4+ cytokines and/or CD8+ cells
Cellular inflammation and/or direct killing
Antibody-associated (type II)
Antibodies to cellular / tissue targets
Opsonization, inflammation or receptor dysfunction
Immune complex (type III)
Deposited antigen–antibody complexes
Complement-driven inflammatory damage
Slide 61 · Interpreting a suspected cellular hypersensitivity lesion
Identify the dominant infiltrating cells and their tissue distribution.
Ask whether the trigger is a repeat antigen exposure or a persistent stimulus.
Distinguish a cytokine-associated phagocyte response from direct CTL cytolysis.
Correlate lesion morphology with clinical context; A single stain is not definitive.
Which cells dominate the infiltrate?
Was there sensitization or persistence?
Cytokine activation or direct cytolysis?
Integrate morphology with exposure
Slide 62 · Caution: Disease mechanisms are partly inferred
Many pathogenic T-cell specificities remain uncertain.
Some human disease mechanisms are inferred from experimental animal models.
A Th1 or Th17 association is not proof of an exclusive pathway.
Avoid turning candidate antigens into established diagnostic biomarkers.
Antigen specificity ≠ always known
Mechanistic overlap is common
Inference is not direct proof
Slide 63 · Case exercise: An indurated skin reaction
A sensitized person develops an indurated reaction after an intradermal antigen challenge.
Which immune-cell program and tissue morphology best explain the delayed response?
Identify the expected timing of peak inflammatory activity.
Antigen recall
Th1 IFN-γ
Perivascular T cells / macrophages
Slide 64 · Case discussion: Delayed skin reaction
The mechanism is a delayed, antigen-specific CD4+ T-cell inflammatory response.
IFN-γ activates macrophages; Perivascular mononuclear cuffing is expected.
For tuberculin, erythema and induration peak about 24–72 hours after challenge.
Memory / effector CD4+ cells
IFN-γ macrophage activation
Induration / cuffing
Slide 65 · Case exercise: Vesicles after plant contact
An individual develops a pruritic vesicular rash after poison ivy exposure.
Explain how a small environmental chemical can trigger T-cell immunity.
Predict the broad epidermal and dermal injury pattern.
Urushiol exposure
Modified host targets
Delayed dermatitis
Slide 66 · Case discussion: Contact sensitivity
Urushiol can alter self proteins and render derived peptides recognizable to T cells.
Chemical modification of HLA is another possible mechanism.
T-cell inflammation produces dermal infiltrates, epidermal injury and vesicles.
Chemical modifies self/HLA
T-cell recognition
Epidermal / dermal injury
Slide 67 · Case exercise: A macrophage-rich nodule
Persistent tissue antigen is followed by a circumscribed epithelioid-cell aggregate.
Which effector cytokine and helper-T-cell subset favor this pattern?
Name a non–Th1-dependent alternative pathway to granuloma formation.
Persistent stimulation
Epithelioid macrophages
Granuloma
Slide 68 · Case discussion: A granulomatous response
Strong Th1-derived IFN-γ promotes sustained macrophage activation.
Epithelioid macrophages aggregate and are often rimmed by lymphocytes.
Indigestible foreign bodies or Th2 responses to schistosome eggs are alternatives.
Th1 IFN-γ (one cause)
Macrophage transformation
Granuloma
Slide 69 · Core mechanistic synthesis
APC + CD4+ priming
Th1 IFN-γ / Th17 cytokines
Macrophages / granulocytes
Inflammation ± injury
The type of cytokine response helps predict recruited cell populations.
Persistent stimulation, not cytokine identity alone, determines chronicity.
Slide 70 · Five essential conclusions
CD4+ T cells induce tissue injury chiefly through cytokine-driven inflammation.
Th1–IFN-γ responses activate macrophages; Th17 promotes neutrophil-rich recruitment.
Classic DTH is delayed and produces perivascular mononuclear inflammation.
Persistent activation may generate epithelioid-cell granulomas.
Clinical examples differ in triggering antigen, inflammatory cells and injury pathway.
Antigen recognition
CD4+ Th1 / Th17 responses
Inflammatory leukocytes
Tissue injury
Slide 71 · Primary reference
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar: Pathologic Basis of Disease. 11th edition (2026).
Chapter 6, Diseases of the Immune System; section “T Cell–Mediated (Type IV) Hypersensitivity,” pp. 189–191.
Additional contextual sections: T-cell activation and cell-mediated immunity (pp. 177–178).
Textbook Table 6.5 and Figures 6.18–6.19 informed original editable teaching diagrams; images were not reproduced.