Request PowerPoint
PowerPoint animations are preserved in the original file.
Slide index (65)
- Loading slide titles…
Loading presentation…
Slide text will appear here when the presentation loads.
Swipe on touchscreens · Use ← / → to change slides, Home / End to jump.
Lecture topics
- Self-tolerance prevents immune injury
- Central selection is preventive, not a clinical diagnosis
- AIRE also influences thymic epithelial differentiation
- The deletion-versus-Treg decision remains unresolved
- Successful editing requires loss of self specificity
- Escape does not automatically produce autoimmune disease
- B-cell vignette: Editing is the rescue mechanism
- Primary reference
Slide index & full transcript (65 slides)
Text from the original slides, in presentation order. Diagrams and images remain in the viewer above.
Slide 1 · Central Tolerance
Immature lymphocyte selection and protection from autoimmunity
T-cell selection in thymus
B-cell selection in marrow
Dr Abu Suraih Sakhri
MBBS, MD (Pathology)
www.abusuraihsakhri.com
Slide 2 · Learning objectives
Interpret central tolerance as a linked series of developmental checkpoints.
Explain why somatic receptor rearrangement creates self-reactive clones.
Trace thymic deletion, AIRE-dependent self-antigen display and thymic Treg development.
Explain bone-marrow receptor editing versus apoptotic B-cell deletion.
Connect imperfect central selection to peripheral tolerance and autoimmunity.
Slide 3 · Self-tolerance prevents immune injury
Autoreactivity must be controlled before it becomes pathogenic.
Antigen receptors are diverse enough to recognize many molecular structures.
Some newly generated receptors recognize components of the host.
Tolerance prevents these potential responses from damaging normal tissue.
Receptor diversity
Self-reactive clones arise
Tolerance restrains injury
Slide 4 · Immunologic tolerance is antigen-specific unresponsiveness
Exposure to an antigen can establish a state of unresponsiveness.
Immunologic tolerance describes unresponsiveness induced by antigen exposure.
Self-tolerance refers specifically to an individual’s own antigens.
The distinction is the identity of the antigen, not a separate immune system.
Immunologic tolerance
Unresponsiveness to an antigen
Self-tolerance
Unresponsiveness to self antigens
Slide 5 · Central tolerance acts during lymphocyte maturation
Immature clones are tested in primary lymphoid organs.
Developing lymphocytes are assessed before joining the mature repertoire.
The thymus is the central tolerance site for T lymphocytes.
Bone marrow is the corresponding site for B lymphocytes.
Thymus
Developing T cells
Bone marrow
Developing B cells
Slide 6 · Central and peripheral tolerance are complementary
Tolerance has a developmental checkpoint and a later safety net.
Central mechanisms operate during maturation in generative organs.
Peripheral mechanisms restrain mature self-reactive cells after their exit.
The second tier is necessary because central selection is not complete.
Immature lymphocyte
Central checkpoint
Mature lymphocyte: Peripheral control
Slide 7 · Random receptor rearrangement creates the problem
Antigen-receptor diversity is generated without foreknowledge of self.
Somatic gene rearrangements generate distinct antigen receptors.
A subset of receptors acquires high affinity for self antigens by chance.
Tolerance is therefore an essential consequence of normal receptor diversity.
Random somatic rearrangement
Diverse antigen receptors
Some recognize self
Slide 8 · Self-reactivity is initially a property of the receptor
Selection addresses specific developing clones—not all lymphocytes.
The relevant signal depends on recognition by a particular receptor.
Different developing clones can react to different self antigens.
Eliminating or changing a dangerous clone preserves the broader repertoire.
Diverse immature clones
Non-self-reactive clone
Self-reactive clone
Alternative outcomes
Slide 9 · Central tolerance makes cells harmless by different routes
Deletion is not the only possible central outcome.
Self-reactive cells may be removed through apoptosis.
Developing B cells may change receptor specificity by receptor editing.
Some CD4-lineage T cells recognizing self differentiate into regulatory T cells.
Self recognition
Apoptotic deletion
Receptor editing / Treg fate
Alternative outcomes
Slide 10 · A conceptual map of the two central organs
The organ and lineage determine the dominant tolerance options.
Feature
T-cell pathway
B-cell pathway
Central site
Thymus
Bone marrow
Principal mechanism
Clonal deletion
Receptor editing / deletion
Additional fate
Thymic Treg generation
No analogous fate described here
Slide 11 · Central selection is preventive, not a clinical diagnosis
Central tolerance is a developmental mechanism.
The normal process does not require tissue inflammation or visible pathology.
Clinical disease appears when failures permit harmful autoimmune responses.
Its mechanisms are best taught through receptor–antigen interactions.
Developmental recognition
Tolerance outcome
Reduced autoreactive repertoire
Slide 12 · The thymus is the T-cell selection environment
Developing T lymphocytes encounter self antigens within the thymus.
Immature T cells express newly generated T-cell receptors (TCRs).
Autologous antigens are processed and presented by thymic antigen-presenting cells.
Recognition can trigger deletion or, in a subset, a regulatory lineage.
Immature T cell: TCR
Self antigen on thymic APC
Selection of cell fate
Slide 13 · TCR recognition is directed at antigen on self MHC
Presentation determines which self determinants can be seen.
Thymic antigen-presenting cells display processed protein antigens.
These are presented in association with self MHC molecules.
An immature TCR can therefore encounter host-derived peptide–MHC complexes.
Self protein
APC: Processing and MHC display
TCR recognition
Slide 14 · Negative selection deletes dangerous T-cell clones
Self-antigen recognition may induce apoptosis in the thymus.
A self-specific immature TCR receives signals upon antigen encounter.
Those signals may culminate in programmed cell death.
The mechanism is termed negative selection, or clonal deletion.
Self-reactive immature T cell
Self-antigen recognition
Apoptosis / deletion
Slide 15 · Negative selection is a clone-level filter
Specificity, rather than wholesale T-cell loss, is the central principle.
Cells bearing receptors for encountered self determinants can be eliminated.
Cells without that problematic recognition are not the target of that signal.
The resulting mature pool is depleted of potentially injurious specificities.
Immature T-cell repertoire
Self recognition → deletion
No such recognition → not deleted by this signal
Alternative outcomes
Slide 16 · Apoptosis removes the receptor-bearing cell
Deletion differs from reversible loss of responsiveness.
The autoreactive lymphocyte is physically eliminated by apoptosis.
Its particular antigen receptor is consequently absent from surviving cells.
Peripheral anergy, by contrast, can silence a mature cell without initial removal.
Clonal deletion
Cell eliminated by apoptosis
Anergy (peripheral)
Cell remains functionally unresponsive
Slide 17 · Thymic antigen display is unusually broad
Selection requires more than thymus-specific antigens.
Many different autologous proteins are processed in the thymus.
The displayed antigen set includes some proteins usually associated with peripheral tissues.
This broad representation allows deletion of clones threatening distant organs.
Autologous proteins
Thymic presentation
Tolerance to represented antigens
Slide 18 · Tissue-restricted antigens create a sampling challenge
An endocrine or other peripheral antigen may rarely occur locally.
A developing T cell can be selected only against antigen it encounters.
Proteins ordinarily restricted to nonthymic tissues require thymic representation.
Specialized expression mechanisms help bridge this anatomical separation.
Peripheral tissue
Normally expresses restricted antigen
Thymus
Must display a relevant self determinant
Slide 19 · AIRE broadens thymic self-antigen representation
AIRE is a key link between thymic selection and distant organs.
AIRE means autoimmune regulator.
It stimulates expression of some peripheral tissue–restricted self antigens within the thymus.
The antigens can then contribute to elimination of self-specific immature T cells.
AIRE activity
Some tissue-restricted self antigens
Deletion of recognizing T cells
Slide 20 · AIRE also influences thymic epithelial differentiation
AIRE is not limited to turning on a list of antigens.
AIRE also promotes differentiation of thymic epithelial cells.
Some resulting cells mimic cells normally found in peripheral tissues.
This increases the repertoire of host proteins encountered in thymic selection.
AIRE
Thymic epithelial cell differentiation
Peripheral tissue-like programs
Slide 21 · AIRE connects antigen availability to deletion
Central tolerance depends on both display and clone recognition.
AIRE-associated tissue antigens become available for thymic presentation.
The matching self-reactive TCR can encounter these determinants.
Deletion prevents that specificity from entering the mature pool.
AIRE-linked antigen display
Matching immature TCR
Apoptosis
Slide 22 · AIRE does not imply universal thymic antigen display
Only some tissue-restricted antigens are induced.
AIRE-dependent expression broadens but does not encompass every self antigen.
Thymic antigen representation remains incomplete.
AIRE therefore improves, but does not perfect, central tolerance.
Self-antigen repertoire
Represented in thymus
Not represented in thymus
Alternative outcomes
Slide 23 · AIRE loss disrupts a specific tolerance pathway
A genetic defect can remove a protective thymic mechanism.
Germline loss-of-function variants of AIRE impair the relevant pathway.
Immature T cells specific for affected tissue antigens may fail to be deleted.
The causal chain links defective thymic education with organ-directed autoimmunity.
AIRE loss of function
Reduced effective self-antigen display
Risk of autoreactive escape
Slide 24 · AIRE deficiency has a human disease correlate
Endocrine autoimmunity illustrates failed central education.
Rare patients with AIRE deficiency develop autoimmune polyglandular syndrome.
Multiple endocrine organs may undergo immune-mediated destruction.
The phenotype supports the physiological importance of thymic self-antigen display.
Inherited AIRE defect
Defective thymic tolerance
Multiple endocrine organs injured
Slide 25 · Autoimmune polyglandular syndrome is mechanistic evidence
A single tolerance pathway can influence several organs.
The defect is in immune tolerance, not necessarily within each targeted gland.
The affected endocrine organs provide a systemic readout of a central selection defect.
This example is not evidence that all autoimmune diseases arise from AIRE mutations.
Primary defect
AIRE-dependent thymic selection
Downstream phenotype
Autoimmunity involving several endocrine organs
Slide 26 · An alternative thymic fate is regulatory T-cell development
Not every CD4-lineage self-recognizing cell undergoes deletion.
Some developing CD4 T cells recognizing self antigens become regulatory T cells.
This lineage later suppresses immune responses, including responses to self.
Thymic Treg generation is a productive outcome of selected self recognition.
Self-reactive CD4-lineage thymocyte
Clonal deletion
Regulatory T-cell development
Alternative outcomes
Slide 27 · Thymic Tregs complement clonal deletion
Deletion and regulation prevent injury by different mechanisms.
Deletion eliminates a developing clone that might otherwise be harmful.
Regulatory T cells persist to restrain activity of other immune cells.
Both outcomes can arise in connection with self-antigen recognition in the thymus.
Deletion
Remove a potentially dangerous clone
Treg development
Produce an immunosuppressive cell
Slide 28 · The deletion-versus-Treg decision remains unresolved
The source does not establish a deterministic selection rule.
The determinants of this thymic fate choice are not established.
TCR affinity for thymic self antigens may contribute.
It would be inaccurate to present a fixed affinity cutoff as an established rule.
Self-antigen recognition
Deletion (one possible fate)
Treg fate (another possible fate)
Alternative outcomes
Slide 29 · Affinity is a proposed influence, not a sole explanation
Avoid converting a hypothesis into an absolute pathway.
The discussion identifies receptor affinity as a possible contributor.
It does not state numerical affinity thresholds or exclusive determinants.
The scientifically sound model leaves the fate decision conditional.
Established
Self recognition can cause deletion or Treg fate
Unresolved
Exact rules governing the choice
Slide 30 · Thymic regulatory cells provide peripheral protection
A central developmental event can yield a peripheral safeguard.
Many regulatory T cells arise in the thymus after self-antigen recognition.
Once mature, these cells suppress potentially harmful immune responses.
Their origin is central; Their suppressive activity largely concerns peripheral responses.
Thymic self recognition
Regulatory T-cell development
Suppression of peripheral responses
Slide 31 · FOXP3 and CD25 help identify the regulatory lineage
The regulatory lineage has a recognizable protein-expression profile.
A well-defined regulatory population is CD4-positive and highly expresses CD25.
FOXP3 is a transcription factor required for functional regulatory T-cell development.
This phenotype describes the regulatory lineage, not the mechanism of thymic deletion.
CD4 Treg lineage
High CD25; FOXP3
Immune regulation
Slide 32 · Regulatory-cell deficiency offers a distinct failure mode
A regulatory defect is not synonymous with AIRE deficiency.
Feature
AIRE defect
FOXP3 defect
Primary pathway
Thymic antigen display
Regulatory T-cell function
Source-linked syndrome
Autoimmune polyglandular syndrome
IPEX
Teaching point
Deletion checkpoint impaired
Regulatory restraint impaired
Slide 33 · Bone marrow is the B-cell checkpoint
Developing B lymphocytes are tested before entering the mature pool.
Immature B cells express newly rearranged antigen receptors.
Self-antigen recognition can reveal potentially autoreactive receptors.
The bone marrow allows a response before those cells reach peripheral tissues.
Immature B cell
Strong recognition of self
Receptor editing or deletion
Slide 34 · Strong self recognition can reactivate rearrangement
Immature B cells have an additional corrective option.
Recognition of self antigen can restart antigen-receptor gene rearrangement.
The cell can consequently express a different receptor.
This is a defining feature of receptor editing.
Self-reactive B-cell receptor
Rearrangement machinery reactivated
New receptor generated
Slide 35 · Receptor editing changes specificity rather than cell identity
The same developing B cell can escape autoreactivity.
The initial receptor recognizes a host antigen strongly.
A subsequent rearrangement creates a new antigen receptor.
If it is no longer specific for self, the cell need not be discarded for that reason.
Original receptor: Self-reactive
Rearranged receptor
New specificity: Not self-reactive
Slide 36 · Editing is a second chance for an immature B cell
Receptor revision preserves a useful developing cell.
B-cell deletion eliminates a cell together with its receptor.
Editing instead attempts to replace the dangerous specificity.
The outcome is functional tolerance without obligatory loss of the clone.
Deletion
Discard cell carrying self-reactive receptor
Editing
Replace receptor specificity within the cell
Slide 37 · Successful editing requires loss of self specificity
A new receptor is valuable only if it corrects autoreactivity.
Rearrangement must generate specificity different from the original self-reactive receptor.
The edited receptor is described as no longer specific for self antigens.
The tolerance outcome depends on changed recognition, not merely rearrangement itself.
Receptor rearrangement
Altered antigen recognition
Self specificity removed
Slide 38 · Failure of editing results in deletion
Apoptosis is the fallback when autoreactivity remains.
Some developing self-reactive B cells do not successfully edit their receptors.
If receptor editing does not occur, the self-reactive cells undergo apoptosis.
This removes potentially dangerous specificities from the mature B-cell pool.
Strong self recognition
Effective editing → altered receptor
No editing → apoptosis
Alternative outcomes
Slide 39 · The B-cell pathway is a sequence of decisions
Receptor revision precedes elimination in the described pathway.
First, self antigen is recognized by an immature B cell.
Second, receptor rearrangement may be reactivated.
Third, the repertoire is shaped by successful editing or cell death.
Self recognition
Receptor editing attempt
New specificity or deletion
Slide 40 · Receptor editing is common during B-cell maturation
Editing is estimated to affect a substantial proportion of B cells.
An estimated one-quarter to one-half of B cells may have been edited.
This is a broad textbook estimate, not a universal rate for each B-cell subset.
The point is that editing is a major physiological mechanism, not a rare anomaly.
Textbook estimate
About one-quarter to one-half of B cells
Interpretation
Editing contributes substantially to the normal repertoire
Slide 41 · Receptor editing and T-cell deletion solve related problems
Both remove hazardous receptor specificity by different routes.
Aspect
Immature T cell
Immature B cell
Site
Thymus
Bone marrow
Response to self
Deletion; sometimes Treg fate
Editing; deletion if no editing
Mechanistic emphasis
Remove dangerous clone
Replace receptor when possible
Slide 42 · Editing is not peripheral anergy
Three tolerance terms describe distinct mechanisms.
Mechanism
What changes?
Where emphasized?
Receptor editing
Antigen-receptor specificity
Immature B cells, marrow
Clonal deletion
Cell survival
Central T and B checkpoints
Anergy
Functional responsiveness
Peripheral tolerance
Slide 43 · Receptor diversity requires both generation and correction
Immune competence and self-protection are coupled processes.
Random rearrangement creates recognition breadth and the risk of autoreactivity.
Editing provides a second rearrangement in selected self-reactive B cells.
Apoptotic deletion prevents unsuccessful cells from contributing to mature immunity.
Diverse receptors generated
Self-reactive receptors identified
Edit or eliminate
Slide 44 · Central tolerance cannot test unseen antigens
Selection is constrained by which self antigens are represented.
Not every self antigen is available in the thymus and bone marrow.
A cell can carry a receptor for a self antigen absent during its maturation.
Such cells may escape into the mature repertoire despite normal selection.
Self antigen not encountered
No effective central deletion
Autoreactive cell reaches periphery
Slide 45 · Escape does not automatically produce autoimmune disease
A self-reactive cell is a risk, not synonymous with tissue injury.
Cells escaping central tolerance retain the potential to cause tissue injury.
Other peripheral tolerance mechanisms may delete or silence them.
Disease requires failure of sufficient protection against harmful responses.
Central escape
Peripheral safeguards
Injury if safeguards fail
Slide 46 · Peripheral tolerance provides a second checkpoint
Mature self-reactive cells can still be restrained.
Peripheral tolerance acts after lymphocytes reach peripheral tissues.
Major safeguards include anergy, regulatory T-cell suppression, and apoptosis.
These processes complement rather than replace thymic and marrow selection.
Mature self-reactive cell
Peripheral control
No harmful activation
Slide 47 · Anergy is functional silencing of a mature lymphocyte
Failure to receive adequate activation signals can prevent response.
Antigen recognition alone may be insufficient to activate a mature T cell.
If antigen is presented without appropriate costimulation, the cell may become anergic.
This is a peripheral mechanism, distinct from deletion during development.
Mature T cell sees antigen
Inadequate costimulation
Anergy
Slide 48 · Regulatory T cells suppress responses after thymic education
Developmental selection can generate a protective regulatory population.
Thymic self-antigen recognition contributes to regulatory T-cell generation.
Mature regulatory T cells restrain activation of other lymphocytes.
Their suppressive role addresses potentially self-reactive cells in the periphery.
Thymic Treg origin
Mature regulatory T cell
Suppression of other responses
Slide 49 · Peripheral deletion is not central negative selection
Similar endpoint; Different phase of lymphocyte life.
Both processes may involve apoptosis of self-reactive cells.
Central deletion takes place during immature lymphocyte selection.
Peripheral deletion acts after maturation, when autoreactive cells encounter self.
Central deletion
Developing clone in thymus or marrow
Peripheral deletion
Mature clone outside primary organs
Slide 50 · Autoimmunity emerges when tolerance mechanisms fail
Breakdown can involve selection and/or later regulation.
Autoimmune disease reflects immune attack on self antigens.
Genetic susceptibility may disrupt distinct tolerance pathways.
Infections or tissue injury can also favor exposure of self antigens and immune activation.
Tolerance defect / trigger
Self-reactive immune response
Tissue injury
Slide 51 · The mechanism of autoimmunity shapes its phenotype
Organ specificity depends on what the immune system targets.
Responses directed at one organ yield organ-focused manifestations.
Responses against widespread antigens can produce systemic disease.
Central-tolerance defects contribute to risk but do not alone identify a target organ.
Organ-focused autoreactivity
Disease concentrated in a tissue
Widespread antigen targeting
Multi-organ disease
Slide 52 · Mechanistic boundaries matter in slide interpretation
Do not transfer facts between stages without justification.
Concept
Central assignment
Do not conflate with
AIRE
Thymic antigen representation
All peripheral antigen display
Receptor editing
Immature B-cell receptor revision
T-cell deletion
Anergy
Peripheral functional silencing
Central apoptotic deletion
Slide 53 · Clinical vignette: An inherited AIRE defect
A defined gene defect predicts a particular mechanism of tolerance failure.
A patient has a germline AIRE loss-of-function mutation.
The source associates this defect with autoimmune polyglandular syndrome.
Question: Which checkpoint fails first—antigen representation or peripheral anergy?
Given
Germline AIRE loss of function
Reasoning
Impaired thymic presentation of some tissue antigens
Inference
Self-reactive T cells may escape deletion
Slide 54 · AIRE vignette: The mechanistic answer
The primary defect is inadequate central education.
AIRE supports thymic expression of some tissue-restricted self antigens.
Without this function, relevant thymic deletion becomes less effective.
The clinical consequence can include immune injury to multiple endocrine organs.
AIRE loss
Missed thymic self-specificity
Endocrine autoimmunity
Slide 55 · Clinical vignette: A self-reactive immature B cell
Choose a developmental tolerance outcome from the cell type.
An immature marrow B cell strongly recognizes a self antigen.
Antigen-receptor rearrangement machinery is reactivated.
Question: What result permits this cell to avoid self reactivity?
Cell
Immature B lymphocyte
Event
Strong self recognition
Required outcome
A different receptor not specific for self
Slide 56 · B-cell vignette: Editing is the rescue mechanism
Changing the receptor removes the original problematic specificity.
The developing B cell can generate a new receptor through editing.
If the new receptor lacks self specificity, the dangerous recognition is removed.
If editing does not occur, apoptosis as the alternative.
Self-reactive immature B cell
Editing → new receptor
No editing → deletion
Alternative outcomes
Slide 57 · Clinical vignette: Missing thymic self antigen
A normal receptor may evade deletion because the antigen is absent.
An immature T cell can respond to a protein expressed in a distant tissue.
Suppose that protein is not represented during thymic selection.
Question: Can a clone specific for this antigen be guaranteed to be deleted?
Thymic presentation
Antigen absent
Central outcome
Relevant deletion cannot be assured
Next safeguard
Peripheral tolerance
Slide 58 · Missing-antigen vignette: Peripheral backup is essential
Central tolerance cannot delete cells against unseen targets.
The thymic selection process cannot respond to an antigen not encountered.
A mature autoreactive clone can therefore enter peripheral tissues.
Anergy, regulation, and deletion help prevent progression to injury.
Unrepresented antigen
Autoreactive escape
Peripheral restraint
Slide 59 · Distinguish AIRE loss from FOXP3 loss
Both promote autoimmunity, but disrupt different steps.
Question
AIRE loss
FOXP3 loss
Primary biology
Thymic antigen display
Regulatory T-cell development/function
Central lesson
Defective clonal education
Defective immune restraint
Syndrome in source
Autoimmune polyglandular syndrome
IPEX
Slide 60 · Assessment: Identify the developmental checkpoint
Three observations reveal three different tolerance outcomes.
Observation
Correct interpretation
Apoptotic immature T cell
Central negative selection
New B-cell receptor after rearrangement
Receptor editing
Self-recognizing CD4 cell becomes Treg
Thymic regulatory lineage
Slide 61 · Assessment: Identify the statement that exceeds evidence
Mechanistic conclusions require correct qualification.
Supported: AIRE promotes expression of some tissue-restricted antigens.
Supported: Affinity may contribute to deletion-versus-Treg fate.
Unsupported: All self antigens are displayed, or an exact TCR-affinity threshold is known.
Supported statement
Self presentation is broad but incomplete
Overclaim to avoid
Central tolerance eliminates every self-reactive lymphocyte
Slide 62 · The central-tolerance pathway in one view
The major branch points differ between T and B maturation.
Checkpoint
Trigger
Major outcome
Thymus
TCR recognizes self peptide–MHC
Apoptosis; some CD4 Treg fate
Bone marrow
Immature BCR strongly recognizes self
Receptor editing or apoptosis
Periphery
Autoreactive mature cell escapes
Anergy / regulation / deletion
Slide 63 · Five mechanistic conclusions
Central tolerance is a selective developmental safeguard.
Receptor diversity inevitably creates potentially autoreactive specificity.
Antigen representation and receptor recognition jointly determine selection.
AIRE, thymic regulatory fates, and B-cell editing provide distinct protections.
The system is incomplete and must be reinforced after maturation.
Diversify
Test against self
Delete, edit or regulate
Slide 64 · Learning check: Three discriminating questions
A correct explanation identifies lineage, site and cellular outcome.
Which organ deletes many immature T cells recognizing self antigen?
How can a strongly self-reactive immature B cell change specificity?
Why can a self-reactive clone still reach peripheral tissues?
Model answers
Thymus; Receptor editing; Incomplete antigen representation
Clinical significance
Peripheral safeguards are needed to prevent injury
Slide 65 · Primary reference
The diagrams and explanations are original teaching adaptations of the supplied chapter.
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar: Pathologic Basis of Disease
11th edition (2026) · Chapter 6, “Diseases of the Immune System”
Central Tolerance and adjoining Immunologic / Peripheral Tolerance sections