Injury by Therapeutic Drugs Adverse Drug Reactions
66 slides · PPTX & PDF available
Request PowerPoint
PowerPoint animations are preserved in the original file.
Slide index (66)
- Loading slide titles…
Loading presentation…
Slide text will appear here when the presentation loads.
Swipe on touchscreens · Use ← / → to change slides, Home / End to jump.
Lecture topics
- What should you be able to explain?
- Immune-mediated reactions have varied targets
- Immune thrombocytopenia may be drug-induced
- Drug-induced lupus can imitate autoimmunity
- Pulmonary drug injury has three presentations
- Neurologic effects can be sensory or motor
- Aspirin toxicity is a distinct exposure scenario
- Reference
Slide index & full transcript (66 slides)
Text from the original slides, in presentation order. Diagrams and images remain in the viewer above.
Slide 1 · Injury by Therapeutic Drugs (Adverse Drug Reactions)
Pathologic patterns, mechanisms, and clinicopathologic correlations
General pathology • clinicopathologic interpretation
Dr Abu Suraih Sakhri
MBBS, MD (Pathology)
www.abusuraihsakhri.com
Slide 2 · What should you be able to explain?
Define an adverse drug reaction and distinguish it from overdose toxicity.
Contrast direct drug actions with immune-mediated hypersensitivity.
Recognize organ injury patterns and representative causal drugs.
Link a medication history to morphology without assuming causation.
Slide 3 · ADRs occur at prescribed drug doses
UNWANTED EFFECT DURING THERAPEUTIC USE
An adverse drug reaction is an undesired effect occurring when a medication is taken at its prescribed dose.
This definition makes the exposure context essential to labeling an event an ADR.
An intentional or accidental overdose can also cause drug injury, but is a distinct exposure circumstance.
Slide 4 · Therapeutic benefit and injury coexist
Therapeutic intent
Prevent disease or control symptoms
The same drug has a desired pharmacologic effect
Treatment benefit may justify some risk
Undesired consequence
Unintended tissue or functional injury
Severity ranges from mild to life-threatening
Risk–benefit judgment depends on context
Adverse does not mean the medication was necessarily prescribed incorrectly.
Slide 5 · Exposure context changes interpretation
Therapeutic dosing
Excessive dosing
Reaction arises during prescribed use
Toxicity follows drug amounts beyond prescribed use
The event may be called an ADR
Classify as overdose / poisoning when appropriate
Example: minocycline pigmentation
Example: acetaminophen overdose injury
The same drug can cause different injuries under different exposure conditions.
Slide 6 · Most ADRs are not life-threatening
ADRs are common in clinical practice.
Most are not life-threatening; A minority lead to major organ injury or death.
Drug-induced pathology spans skin, blood, heart, kidney, lung, liver, and nervous system.
The severity of an outcome cannot be inferred from the drug name alone.
Slide 7 · ADRs occur beyond the hospital
Ambulatory care
Medication exposure occurs in outpatient settings
New or persistent symptoms may represent a treatment effect
Long-term care
Nursing-home settings
Medication-related injury must remain in the differential
A medication review matters in every care setting.
Slide 8 · Age over 65 increases ADR susceptibility
HOST SUSCEPTIBILITY
People older than 65 years as more likely to experience ADRs.
Age is a risk marker, not a diagnostic test for drug causation.
The clinical implication is heightened attention to new findings after medication exposure.
Slide 9 · Two major routes to drug injury
Therapeutic drug exposure
Direct drug actions or immune response
Cellular / tissue change
Clinical ADR
Conceptual model: Injury mechanism precedes the observed lesion.
Slide 10 · Direct drug effects are organ-specific
Mechanism
An effect of the medication or its metabolite
May manifest as functional disturbance or tissue injury
Examples
Anticoagulants → bleeding
Anthracyclines → cardiomyopathy
Aminoglycosides → tubular necrosis
A plausible pharmacologic mechanism strengthens—but does not establish—attribution.
Slide 11 · Immune-mediated reactions have varied targets
Drug exposure
Hypersensitivity response
Skin / blood / systemic involvement
Manifest clinical syndrome
The immune pathway can resemble primary immunologic disease.
Slide 12 · Direct injury versus hypersensitivity
Dimension
Direct drug action
Hypersensitivity
Dominant concept
Toxic or pharmacologic action
Immune-mediated response
Representative presentation
Drug-associated bleeding
Drug-associated rash
Other examples
Cardiac or renal toxicity
Drug-induced lupus-like disease
Pathology question
Which organ is directly injured?
Could an immune disorder be mimicked?
Slide 13 · Potent treatments may carry accepted risks
RISK–BENEFIT CONTEXT
Antineoplastic agents are cited as medications with substantial adverse effects.
Such effects may be considered acceptable risks in the context of treatment benefit.
The decision depends on the purpose of treatment and expected consequences—not on morphology alone.
Slide 14 · Map adverse reactions by target tissue
Tissue compartment
Representative injury
Blood / marrow
Cytopenias; hemolytic anemia
Skin
Inflammatory eruption or pigment change
Heart / kidney
Arrhythmia; cardiomyopathy; nephritis
Lung / liver
Pneumonitis; fibrosis; hepatitis; cholestasis
Systemic / CNS
Anaphylaxis; lupus-like syndrome; neurologic effects
Slide 15 · Blood-cell injury spans several lineages
White cells
Granulocytopenia
Red cells
Hemolytic anemia
Platelets
Thrombocytopenia
Distinguish lineage-specific destruction from broader marrow injury.
Slide 16 · Granulocytopenia is a drug-associated pattern
Granulocytopenia appears among the marrow and blood-cell reactions listed by Robbins.
It indicates a marked reduction in circulating granulocytes.
Antineoplastic drugs and chloramphenicol are listed among the major agents for marrow suppression patterns.
Slide 17 · Aplastic anemia and pancytopenia implicate marrow
Aplastic anemia
A marrow-failure syndrome
The primary abnormality involves hematopoietic production
Pancytopenia
Reduction across major blood-cell lineages
A descriptive peripheral-blood finding
These labels are related but not interchangeable.
Slide 18 · Antineoplastic drugs can suppress hematopoiesis
Potent antineoplastic therapy
Injury to hematopoietic compartment
One or more cytopenias
Clinical consequences
Framework linking a potent treatment class to blood-cell deficits.
Slide 19 · Hemolytic anemia reflects red-cell loss
Hemolytic anemia as a possible drug-related blood disorder.
Penicillin, methyldopa, and quinidine appear among the associated drug examples.
Drug-induced hemolysis is a different pathologic pathway from generalized marrow failure.
Slide 20 · Immune thrombocytopenia may be drug-induced
Thrombocytopenia
Reduced platelet number
Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia is identified
Heparin is among listed drug associations
Anticoagulant-associated bleeding
Impaired coagulation during intended therapy
Warfarin and dabigatran are listed
Platelet loss is not required
Low platelets and anticoagulant hemorrhage are distinct mechanisms.
Slide 21 · Different mechanisms can produce bleeding
Medication exposure
Platelet reduction or coagulation inhibition
Impaired hemostasis
Hemorrhagic manifestation
The observed event is the endpoint; Identify the relevant hemostatic defect.
Slide 22 · Cutaneous ADRs have diverse morphologies
Cutaneous patterns
Additional skin findings
Urticaria
Petechiae
Macules and papules
Exfoliative dermatitis
Vesicles
Fixed drug eruptions
—
Abnormal pigmentation
Pattern recognition identifies the lesion; Medication linkage requires history.
Slide 23 · Urticaria, macules, and papules are common clues
Robbins specifically lists urticaria and maculopapular lesions among cutaneous ADRs.
Such eruptions are compatible with—but not specific for—drug-related hypersensitivity.
The key pathologic distinction is an inflammatory reaction rather than pigment accumulation.
Slide 24 · Vesicles and exfoliation expand the skin spectrum
The cutaneous list includes vesicular lesions and exfoliative dermatitis.
Petechiae are another named manifestation; Not every drug eruption has the same underlying process.
A description of the morphologic pattern should precede a claim about the culprit drug.
Slide 25 · Pigmentation is not necessarily inflammation
Inflammatory eruption
Urticaria, papules, or vesicles
Often considered in hypersensitivity
Drug-pigment deposition
Abnormal skin coloration
May reflect retained drug-related material
The two mechanisms suggest different morphologic questions.
Slide 26 · Minocycline can discolor the skin
MINOCYCLINE-ASSOCIATED PIGMENTATION
Diffuse blue-gray forearm pigmentation following minocycline use.
The pigment is associated with an oxidized metabolite of this antibiotic.
The example shows that an ADR may be visible as a deposition process rather than an acute inflammatory lesion.
Slide 27 · Minocycline pigmentation localizes to the dermis
Schematic skin cross-section
Epidermis
Dermis
Deposited pigment particles
The published example shows drug metabolite, iron, and melanin pigment particles within dermis.
Dermal deposition explains why the clinical change appears as persistent skin coloration.
The drawing is an original schematic, not the textbook photomicrograph.
Slide 28 · The offender list for skin reactions is broad
Examples emphasized in Robbins
Relevant cutaneous outcome
Antineoplastic drugs
Multiple eruption patterns
Sulfonamides
Drug-related skin eruptions
Hydantoins
Drug-related skin eruptions
Various antibiotics
Drug-related skin eruptions
These offender lists show associations rather than establish individual causation.
Slide 29 · Drug-induced lupus can imitate autoimmunity
Clinical-pathologic mimic
Drug reaction resembling systemic lupus erythematosus
An immune-mediated pattern is possible
Associated agents
Hydralazine
Procainamide
Consider drug exposure when a lupus-like syndrome is encountered.
Slide 30 · Anaphylaxis is a systemic drug reaction
Medication exposure
Hypersensitivity response
Systemic anaphylaxis
Potentially severe outcome
Penicillin is a representative drug listed for anaphylaxis.
Slide 31 · Cardiac ADRs affect rhythm or muscle
Arrhythmia
Electrical/rhythm disturbance
Digoxin, theophylline, hydantoins
Cardiomyopathy
Myocardial tissue dysfunction
Doxorubicin, daunorubicin
Both are “cardiac” outcomes, but they are not the same lesion.
Slide 32 · Drug-related arrhythmias
Theophylline, hydantoins, and digoxin are listed as major examples.
An arrhythmia is a functional electrical disturbance; It does not by itself prove structural myocardial injury.
Medication association and the rhythm phenotype should be assessed separately.
Slide 33 · Anthracyclines are associated with cardiomyopathy
MYOCARDIAL TOXICITY
Doxorubicin and daunorubicin are listed as agents associated with cardiomyopathy.
The affected structure is the myocardium rather than primarily the cardiac conduction pattern.
This example illustrates a clinically important adverse effect of potent antineoplastic therapy.
Slide 34 · Drug-induced renal injury has three patterns
Glomerulus
Glomerulonephritis
Tubules
Acute tubular necrosis
Tubulointerstitium / papilla
Tubulointerstitial disease with papillary necrosis
Identify the compartment before selecting a likely drug association.
Slide 35 · Penicillamine is associated with glomerulonephritis
Penicillamine among agents associated with glomerulonephritis.
The glomerular compartment is the named target of injury.
Differentiate glomerular involvement from tubular necrosis or papillary disease.
Slide 36 · Acute tubular necrosis has a drug differential
Renal lesion
Offending drugs listed
Acute tubular necrosis
Aminoglycoside antibiotics
Acute tubular necrosis
Cyclosporin
Acute tubular necrosis
Amphotericin B
Three distinct therapies converge on a tubular injury pattern.
Slide 37 · Papillary necrosis is another renal drug lesion
Lesion
Tubulointerstitial disease
Associated papillary necrosis
Representative agents
Phenacetin
Salicylates
Papillary injury is not synonymous with acute tubular necrosis.
Slide 38 · Pulmonary drug injury has three presentations
Airways
Asthma
Acute lung tissue
Pneumonitis
Interstitial compartment
Fibrosis
The respiratory presentation is not a single uniform toxic syndrome.
Slide 39 · Salicylates can precipitate asthma
Salicylates are listed as agents associated with asthma.
The dominant manifestation is an airway disorder rather than fibrosis.
A respiratory symptom during therapy cannot automatically be classified as an infectious pneumonitis.
Slide 40 · Nitrofurantoin is linked to acute pneumonitis
Drug association
Nitrofurantoin
Named as an acute pneumonitis offender
Diagnostic distinction
Acute lung inflammation pattern
Different from the chronic interstitial fibrosis category
One drug appears in more than one respiratory injury category.
Slide 41 · Several drugs are linked to pulmonary fibrosis
Pulmonary pattern
Drugs listed
Interstitial fibrosis
Busulfan
Interstitial fibrosis
Nitrofurantoin
Interstitial fibrosis
Bleomycin
A fibrotic interstitial lesion has a medication-related differential.
Slide 42 · Hepatic ADRs show three injury categories
Fat accumulation
Fatty change
Hepatocytes
Diffuse hepatocellular damage
Bile flow
Cholestasis
The dominant tissue reaction helps organize causal-drug possibilities.
Slide 43 · Tetracycline can produce hepatic fatty change
Fatty change is one of the hepatic morphologic responses listed by Robbins.
Tetracycline is one drug associated with this hepatic pattern.
Steatosis should not be equated with diffuse hepatocellular damage or cholestasis.
Slide 44 · Diffuse hepatocellular damage has several causes
Pathologic pattern
Representative drug
Diffuse hepatocellular damage
Halothane
Diffuse hepatocellular damage
Isoniazid
Diffuse hepatocellular damage
Acetaminophen
A shared injury category does not imply identical mechanisms or exposure contexts.
Slide 45 · Cholestasis is a distinct hepatic drug pattern
Drug associations
Named hepatic outcome
Chlorpromazine
Cholestasis
Estrogens
Cholestasis
Contraceptive agents
Cholestasis
A drug may disturb bile handling without the dominant morphology being steatosis.
Slide 46 · The hepatic lesion directs the differential
Parenchymal injury
Fatty change or hepatocellular damage
Consider tetracycline, isoniazid, halothane, acetaminophen
Biliary-pattern injury
Cholestasis
Consider chlorpromazine or hormonal agents
Describe the lesion pattern before selecting the most plausible medication.
Slide 47 · Neurologic effects can be sensory or motor
Neurologic manifestation
Medication example
Tinnitus; dizziness
Salicylates
Acute dystonic reactions
Phenothiazine antipsychotics
Parkinsonian syndrome
Phenothiazine antipsychotics
Respiratory depression
Sedatives
Slide 48 · Phenothiazines can cause extrapyramidal syndromes
Acute dystonic reaction
Abnormal movement / sustained muscle contraction
Named adverse reaction
Parkinsonian syndrome
Drug-associated parkinsonian motor phenotype
Named adverse reaction
Neither clinical motor syndrome should be mistaken for a tissue-necrosis pattern.
Slide 49 · Sedatives can depress respiration
Sedative exposure
Depression of respiratory drive
Respiratory depression
Potentially serious clinical injury
A functional disturbance can be life-threatening without a specific biopsy lesion.
Slide 50 · Anticoagulants expose a therapeutic trade-off
Prevention of thrombosis / embolism
Inhibition of coagulation
Reduced thrombotic potential
Increased bleeding susceptibility
Anticoagulant-associated bleeding is explicitly discussed by Robbins.
Slide 51 · Warfarin and dabigatran are bleeding examples
Warfarin
Vitamin K antagonist
Food and drug interactions complicate therapy
Regular blood testing is described
Dabigatran
Direct thrombin inhibitor
Included among DOACs
Bleeding remains a treatment-related risk
Both are therapies for thrombosis prevention; Both can produce serious bleeding.
Slide 52 · Hormonal treatments illustrate population risk
Therapy group
Adverse effect emphasized in Robbins
Menopausal hormone therapy
Thromboembolism and stroke risk vary with regimen and clinical context
Oral contraceptives
Venous thromboembolism; association with hepatic adenoma
Hormonal agents generally
Some agents are associated with hepatic cholestasis
Risk varies by drug formulation and patient context; Avoid treating all formulations as identical.
Slide 53 · Overdose toxicity is a useful contrast—not an ADR
Prescribed-dose ADR
By definition occurs at the prescribed dose
Minocycline pigmentation and drug rashes illustrate the concept
Drug overdose injury
Excessive exposure is the defining circumstance
Acetaminophen and aspirin illustrate major toxic injury
Use exposure context precisely when teaching pharmacotoxicology.
Slide 54 · Acetaminophen toxicity explains reactive metabolites
Acetaminophen
CYP2E1 pathway
Reactive NAPQI
Hepatocellular injury
At ordinary doses, the larger share undergoes detoxification; Overdose increases reactive-metabolite burden.
Slide 55 · Acetaminophen injury targets centrilobular hepatocytes
Excess NAPQI causes covalent protein binding and mitochondrial injury.
Glutathione depletion increases susceptibility to oxidant damage.
The characteristic injury is centrilobular hepatocellular necrosis, which can progress to liver failure.
This exemplifies overdose toxicology, not an automatically presumed prescribed-dose ADR.
Slide 56 · Aspirin toxicity is a distinct exposure scenario
Excess salicylate
Early respiratory stimulation
Later metabolic derangement
Possible CNS toxicity
An early respiratory alkalosis followed by metabolic acidosis.
Slide 57 · Chronic aspirin exposure can cause bleeding
Gastric injury
Acute erosive gastritis
Possible gastric ulceration and GI bleeding
Hemostatic effect
Irreversible platelet cyclooxygenase inhibition
Reduced thromboxane A₂–dependent aggregation
Mucosal injury and defective platelet function can amplify bleeding.
Slide 58 · Case: Delayed blue-gray skin discoloration
A patient receiving prolonged minocycline therapy develops diffuse blue-gray pigmentation on the forearm.
Which tissue-level finding supports the medication association?
Interpretation
Pigment particles containing drug metabolite, iron, and melanin in the dermis; This is a deposition-type ADR.
Slide 59 · Case: Cytopenias after potent treatment
A person undergoing antineoplastic therapy develops simultaneous reductions in multiple blood-cell lineages.
Which hematologic reaction category best explains this finding?
Interpretation
Pancytopenia / marrow suppression; Antineoplastic agents are major listed offenders.
Slide 60 · Case: Drug-related acute kidney injury
A patient exposed to an aminoglycoside antibiotic develops a renal lesion reported as acute tubular necrosis.
Which renal compartment is primarily involved?
Interpretation
The renal tubular compartment. Robbins specifically links aminoglycosides with acute tubular necrosis.
Slide 61 · Case: Two pulmonary drug syndromes
One exposed patient has acute pneumonitis; Another has interstitial pulmonary fibrosis.
Which medication is associated with both patterns?
Interpretation
Nitrofurantoin. The histopathologic pattern, not only the drug name, distinguishes the syndromes.
Slide 62 · Case: Cholestasis rather than hepatocyte necrosis
A patient taking chlorpromazine is evaluated for a hepatic adverse reaction characterized as cholestasis.
What hepatic injury category best describes this finding?
Interpretation
Drug-associated cholestasis—not the separate category of diffuse hepatocellular damage.
Slide 63 · Integrate medication, lesion, and competing causes
Document drug exposure and dose
Describe the clinical / pathologic pattern
Compare known drug associations
Evaluate competing explanations
This is an educational interpretation framework, not a formal causality-scoring tool.
Slide 64 · High-yield injury pattern comparison
Target
Pathologic reaction
Representative drug
Marrow
Cytopenias
Antineoplastic therapy
Skin
Dermal pigmentation
Minocycline
Heart
Cardiomyopathy
Doxorubicin
Kidney
Acute tubular necrosis
Aminoglycosides
Lung
Interstitial fibrosis
Bleomycin
Liver
Cholestasis
Chlorpromazine
Slide 65 · Summary: Five durable distinctions
An ADR is an unwanted effect at the prescribed dose; Overdose is a separate exposure context.
Both direct drug effects and immune hypersensitivity can injure organs.
Anatomic site and lesion pattern organize the medication differential.
One medication can produce different manifestations in different patients.
A compatible drug history does not, by itself, prove causality.
Slide 66 · Reference
Core reading
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar Pathologic Basis of Disease, 11th edition (2026)
Environmental and Nutritional Diseases Injury by Therapeutic Drugs (Adverse Drug Reactions) Organ-specific toxicities and immune reactions