Request PowerPoint
PowerPoint animations are preserved in the original file.
Slide index (70)
- Loading slide titles…
Loading presentation…
Slide text will appear here when the presentation loads.
Swipe on touchscreens · Use ← / → to change slides, Home / End to jump.
Lecture topics
- Leishmaniasis is an intracellular protozoal disease
- The mammalian reservoir interface
- Leishmania actively modifies innate defense
- T-helper polarization and infection control
- The visceral syndrome has a recognizable cluster
- Cutaneous ulcers are slowly progressive
- Localized versus diffuse cutaneous pathology
- Reference and interpretive boundaries
Slide index & full transcript (70 slides)
Text from the original slides, in presentation order. Diagrams and images remain in the viewer above.
Slide 1 · Leishmaniasis
Pathogenesis, morphology and clinicopathologic correlation
Pathology and clinical correlations
Dr Abu Suraih Sakhri
MBBS, MD (Pathology)
www.abusuraihsakhri.com
Slide 2 · Learning objectives
Differentiate the promastigote and amastigote stages within the sandfly–mammal cycle.
Explain Leishmania survival in phagocytes and the opposing Th1/Th2 immune responses.
Recognize the morphology and clinical consequences of four disease forms.
Connect disease distribution and pathology to source-supported diagnostic approaches.
Slide 3 · Leishmaniasis is an intracellular protozoal disease
Caused by Leishmania, a kinetoplast-containing protozoan parasite.
Produces chronic inflammation in skin, mucous membranes or viscera.
Transmission occurs through bites of infected sandflies.
Disease phenotype reflects both the infecting parasite and the host.
Slide 4 · Three major tissue compartments
Localized infection
Skin lesions may begin at the site of inoculation.
Mucosal disease can involve nasopharyngeal structures.
Tissue inflammation may evolve into granulomas.
Disseminated infection
Macrophages can transport infection through the mononuclear phagocyte system.
Spleen, liver and marrow may become heavily involved.
Systemic inflammatory and hematologic consequences dominate.
Slide 5 · The four recognized morphologic forms
Form
Principal distribution
Defining lesion pattern
Visceral
Mononuclear phagocyte system
Systemic organ enlargement and cytopenias
Cutaneous
Exposed skin
Papule evolving into a slow ulcer
Mucocutaneous
Nasopharyngeal mucosa
Destructive mucosal inflammation
Diffuse cutaneous
Extensive skin
Progressive widespread nodules with foamy macrophages
Slide 6 · Endemicity spans multiple regions
The source identifies the Middle East, South Asia, Africa and Latin America as endemic regions.
“Old World” and “New World” are geographic groupings, not clinical diagnoses.
Exposure history should be interpreted in relation to local transmission ecology.
Slide 7 · Social conditions influence transmission
Leishmaniasis is associated with poverty in endemic regions.
The text describes epidemics following forced migration of people with low immunity.
Movement into an area of intense sandfly transmission changes opportunities for infection.
Slide 8 · Disease burden as reported
Measure
Textbook estimate
Interpretive caution
Cutaneous cases per year
0.6–1 million
Reported estimate; Not presented as a 2026 live count
Visceral cases per year
50,000–90,000
Reported global estimate
Deaths per year
More than 20,000
Reported in the source in context of visceral disease
Slide 9 · Leishmania is a kinetoplastid parasite
The organism contains a distinctive kinetoplast: Mitochondrial DNA concentrated into a specialized structure.
It alternates between an extracellular vector stage and an intracellular mammalian stage.
Recognition of stage and compartment is central to understanding pathogenesis.
Slide 10 · The two developmental forms
Promastigote
Extracellular form in the sandfly.
Slender and flagellated.
Transmitted during an infectious sandfly bite.
Amastigote
Round intracellular stage within mammalian macrophages.
Lacks an external flagellum.
Proliferates in phagolysosomal compartments.
Slide 11 · Transmission cycle at a glance
Sandfly blood meal
Ingests infected host cells
Vector stage
Development as promastigotes
Sandfly bite
Promastigotes enter the dermis
Macrophages
Amastigotes multiply
The next sandfly blood meal can reacquire infection from an infected host.
Slide 12 · Vectors and parasite diversity
The text identifies more than 90 sandfly species as vectors.
Approximately 21 Leishmania species infect humans, according to the textbook.
Parasite identity contributes to geographic distribution and tissue phenotype.
Slide 13 · The mammalian reservoir interface
Reservoir mammals
Rodents are listed as reservoirs.
Dogs can harbor infection.
Foxes are another example.
Transmission bridge
Sandflies feed on infected mammalian hosts.
Vector acquisition starts a developmental cycle within the insect.
Infected vectors can subsequently transmit to people.
Slide 14 · Events within the sandfly
Uptake
Amastigote-bearing host cells
Transformation
Amastigote → promastigote
Amplification
Promastigote multiplication
Transmission
Infectious forms at a subsequent bite
Slide 15 · What happens at the bite site?
Infected sandfly
Inoculates promastigotes
Dermal exposure
Sandfly saliva accompanies inoculation
Host phagocytes
Macrophages internalize organisms
The source attributes enhanced infectivity to sandfly saliva.
Slide 16 · The macrophage is the replication niche
Promastigote uptake
Phagocytosis by macrophage
Acidic compartment
Stage differentiation is induced
Amastigote stage
Rounded intracellular organisms
Replication
Progeny accumulate
Slide 17 · Amastigote structure: What to recognize
Intracellular organism model
Amastigotes are rounded organisms within macrophages.
The kinetoplast is a mitochondrial DNA-containing structure distinct from the nucleus.
The drawing conveys location and components; It is not a substitute for a stained preparation.
Blue dot: Parasite nucleus Red dot: Kinetoplast
Original editable schematic — not a histologic or clinical specimen
Slide 18 · Intracellular amplification and spread
Viable macrophage
Amastigotes replicate
Host-cell death
Progeny organisms released
New macrophages
Additional infection established
The cycle increases parasite-containing phagocytes within an infected tissue.
Slide 19 · What determines dissemination?
Parasite factors
Different Leishmania species have different clinical associations.
Virulence strategies favor survival in innate immune cells.
The source ties parasite identity to extent of spread.
Host factors
Host immune response limits or permits intracellular persistence.
Effective T-cell function is needed to clear infection.
Immunodeficiency can exacerbate infection.
Slide 20 · Species grouping
Grouping
Examples in the source
Regional framing
Old World
L. Major, L. Tropica, L. Donovani, L. Infantum
Parts of Asia, Middle East, Africa, southern Europe
New World
L. Mexicana, L. Braziliensis, L. Chagasi
Mexico, Central America, South America
Slide 21 · Human disease is not confined to classic endemic regions
The text notes some cases in Texas and Oklahoma.
Geography informs suspicion but does not independently establish a diagnosis.
Clinical pattern and tissue or molecular detection remain necessary.
Slide 22 · Leishmania actively modifies innate defense
Survival is not explained solely by passive macrophage uptake.
The source identifies parasite surface factors and subversion of neutrophil defenses.
Additional adaptations involve phagolysosomal conditions, iron handling and immune signaling.
Slide 23 · Two prominent promastigote virulence factors
Lipophosphoglycan
Abundant surface glycoconjugate.
Interferes with the complement pathway.
Supports early survival at host entry.
Gp63 protease
Zinc-dependent surface proteinase.
Cleaves host enzymes described as important to defense.
Illustrates enzymatic subversion of host responses.
Slide 24 · Complement interference supports early entry
Promastigote surface
Lipophosphoglycan
Host interface
Complement pathway interference
Consequence
Enhanced opportunity for parasite survival
This is a mechanistic schematic of the textbook description, not a complete complement cascade.
Slide 25 · Gp63: Protease-mediated host interference
Promastigote
Surface Gp63
Protease activity
Cleavage of host enzymes
Host response
Perturbation of defense pathways
The source does not enumerate specific enzyme substrates; None are inferred here.
Slide 26 · Neutrophil escape has several routes
Parasites interfere with formation of phagolysosomes and fusion with neutrophil granules.
They may occupy intracellular compartments protected from lytic mechanisms.
They can resist reactive oxygen species-mediated toxicity.
Slide 27 · Neutrophil extracellular trap evasion
NET formation
Host extracellular DNA-based defense
Parasite adaptations
Endonucleases and protease-resistant surface molecules
Potential result
Reduced effectiveness of NET-mediated killing
The textbook explicitly describes parasite digestion of NETs.
Slide 28 · Amastigotes resist the phagolysosomal environment
Expected host function
Macrophage phagolysosomes are antimicrobial compartments.
Acidity contributes to the hostile environment.
Killing depends on functional phagocyte defenses.
Source-described adaptation
Amastigotes alter phagolysosomal conditions.
Maintenance near pH 6.5 versus typical pH 4.5.
The stated mechanism supports persistence despite ingestion.
Slide 29 · The iron contest occurs inside infected cells
Parasite acquisition
ZIP-family iron transporter
Local substrate
Iron entry into phagolysosome
Host response
Inflammatory iron restriction
The same intracellular compartment is a source of nutrients and a site of antimicrobial restriction.
Slide 30 · Host defense counteracts parasite iron uptake
Proinflammatory cytokines inhibit cellular iron absorption.
The host downregulates transferrin receptors.
Iron is also removed from the phagosomal compartment.
These responses oppose parasite nutrient acquisition as.
Slide 31 · MicroRNAs contribute to immune disruption
Posttranscriptional gene regulation through microRNAs.
It refers to microRNAs in the parasite and host cells.
Altered cellular signaling is linked to disturbance of protective immunity.
No individual microRNA species or validated target is specified in the source.
Slide 32 · T-helper polarization and infection control
Th1-dominant response
Parasite-specific CD4+ T cells contribute to control.
IFN-γ activates macrophages.
Activated phagocytes become better able to kill parasites.
Th2-dominant response
Susceptible mouse strains show Th2 predominance.
Th2 cytokines impair effective macrophage killing.
Infection control is correspondingly weakened.
Slide 33 · Protective cellular immunity acts through macrophages
Parasite-specific CD4+ Th1
Cellular immune response
IFN-γ
Macrophage-activating signal
Macrophage effector state
Increased parasite killing
This protective mechanism in experimental models and humans.
Slide 34 · A Th2-biased response may favor persistence
Th2-predominant response
Susceptibility in animal models
Reduced macrophage microbicidal activity
Inadequate intracellular clearance
Continued infection
Parasite persistence
Slide 35 · Avoid interpreting Th1 and Th2 as an absolute binary
The textbook uses Th1–Th2 polarization to explain major determinants of susceptibility.
The cited direct strain comparisons are from mice.
Human phenotypes also depend on parasite species and broader immune status.
Th1 and Th2 are teaching mechanisms here, not stand-alone diagnostic tests.
Slide 36 · T-cell dysfunction aggravates leishmaniasis
Impaired T-cell function increases vulnerability to intracellular organisms.
The source compares this susceptibility with mycobacterial, Histoplasma and Toxoplasma infections.
An immune response is necessary for durable parasite clearance even when effective drugs exist.
Slide 37 · HIV coinfection is clinically important
The source notes that many individuals with leishmaniasis are coinfected with HIV.
Compromised cellular immunity may worsen intracellular parasite control.
A systemic leishmanial phenotype should be interpreted in the context of immune competence.
Slide 38 · Disease extent shapes the pathologic phenotype
Extent
Dominant host tissue
Characteristic consequence
Localized dermis
Skin macrophages
Cutaneous papule and ulceration
Mucosal disease
Nasopharyngeal tissue
Inflammatory destruction and scarring
Widespread dermis
Skin macrophages
Disseminated nodular lesions
Systemic dissemination
Mononuclear phagocyte system
Organomegaly, marrow dysfunction, inflammation
Slide 39 · Visceral leishmaniasis is the most severe form
The source describes untreated visceral leishmaniasis as almost always fatal.
Macrophage infection becomes widespread in mononuclear phagocyte organs.
The clinical syndrome combines systemic inflammation, enlargement of organs and cytopenias.
Slide 40 · Systemic macrophage involvement drives visceral disease
Amastigote infection
Macrophages parasitized
Organ infiltration
Spleen, liver and marrow
Tissue dysfunction
Organomegaly, cytopenias and systemic inflammation
Slide 41 · The visceral syndrome has a recognizable cluster
Fever and weight loss reflect systemic illness.
Hepatosplenomegaly and lymphadenopathy reflect mononuclear phagocyte organ involvement.
Pancytopenia signals hematologic consequences.
No single component is pathognomonic; The source recommends parasite detection.
Slide 42 · Spleen: Gross enlargement and structural disruption
Schematic of marked splenomegaly
That the spleen may reach approximately 3 kg.
Phagocyte expansion and plasma-cell accumulation distort normal splenic architecture.
Organ enlargement is part of the systemic mononuclear phagocyte response.
Original editable schematic — not a histologic or clinical specimen
Slide 43 · Spleen: Parasitized macrophages dominate
Simplified cellular model
Phagocytic cells are enlarged and filled with organisms.
Numerous plasma cells are present.
Normal splenic architecture may be obscured by the infiltrate.
Blue dot: Parasite nucleus Red dot: Kinetoplast
Original editable schematic — not a histologic or clinical specimen
Slide 44 · Bone marrow infiltration contributes to blood-count changes
The source describes marrow crowded by parasite-containing phagocytic cells.
Visceral disease is clinically marked by pancytopenia.
Marrow infiltration provides a tissue-level explanation for hematologic compromise, although causation is not exclusive.
Slide 45 · Hepatic disease evolves during progression
Macrophage involvement accompanies visceral dissemination.
The liver enlarges during systemic disease.
In late stages, the source describes increasingly fibrotic hepatic tissue.
Histologic severity should be considered in relation to disease duration.
Slide 46 · Dissemination can extend beyond the core organs
Parasite-containing phagocytes may be present in lung tissue.
Gastrointestinal tract, kidneys and pancreas may be involved.
The testes are also listed among potential locations.
This distribution is described in advanced visceral involvement, not as universal disease.
Slide 47 · Kala-azar: The pigmentation association
Cutaneous hyperpigmentation in some patients of South Asian ancestry.
The designation “kala-azar” refers to “black fever” in Hindi.
Pigmentation is a clinical correlate; Diagnosis should not depend on its presence.
Slide 48 · Renal pathology may be immune mediated
The source reports immune complex–mediated mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis.
Amyloid deposition may occur in advanced disease.
These lesions illustrate that organ injury may extend beyond direct parasite-containing macrophage infiltrates.
Slide 49 · Serious consequences of visceral infection
Infectious complications
Life-threatening secondary bacterial infections occur in advanced disease.
The text gives pneumonia and sepsis as examples.
Tuberculosis is also mentioned.
Hematologic complications
Thrombocytopenia contributes to bleeding risk.
Hemorrhage can be fatal.
Cytopenias coexist with extensive organ involvement.
Slide 50 · Cutaneous lesions change with time
Papule
Induration at exposed skin
Shallow ulcer
Slowly expands
Chronic ulcer
Heaped-up margins
Involution
Often heals with scarring
The source reports spontaneous healing over approximately 6–18 months in typical disease.
Slide 51 · Cutaneous ulcers are slowly progressive
Stylized skin surface (not a lesion photo)
Papule
Expanding ulcer
Involution/scar
Exposed skin is a typical site.
A papule becomes an enlarging superficial ulcer with raised margins.
The time course can be prolonged before involution.
Original editable schematic — not a histologic or clinical specimen
Slide 52 · Cutaneous histology reflects cellular immune response
Granulomatous inflammation is reported in the lesion.
Multinucleated giant cells are often prominent.
Parasites may be few in this inflammatory pattern.
Low organism conspicuity on a section does not by itself rule out disease.
Slide 53 · Localized cutaneous disease may involute
Many lesions healing without treatment.
A 6–18-month timeframe is reported for typical involution.
Healing and the residual scar are distinct from absence of a prior infection.
Clinical outcomes vary with form, so this course should not be generalized to visceral disease.
Slide 54 · Mucocutaneous disease has a regional distribution
Robbins particularly highlights Brazil, Ethiopia and Peru.
The target is nasopharyngeal mucosa rather than skin alone.
Damage to mucosal structures can produce major disfigurement.
Slide 55 · Mucocutaneous lesions can be destructive
Moist lesions may be ulcerating or nonulcerating.
Progressive disease may destroy and disfigure nasopharyngeal tissue.
The clinical risk reflects lesion location and local tissue destruction, not just parasite count.
Slide 56 · Mucocutaneous inflammation changes over time
Early disease
Parasite-bearing macrophages
Inflammatory infiltrate
Lymphocytes and plasma cells
Later lesions
Granulomas; Fewer parasites
Outcome
Scarring; Possible reactivation
Slide 57 · Mucosal reactivation can occur after remission
The text describes lesions that remit and scar.
Reactivation may occur after long intervals.
The mechanisms of reactivation are not currently understood.
Avoid claiming a predictable recurrence interval or molecular trigger.
Slide 58 · Diffuse cutaneous disease spreads through the skin
Diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis is described as rare.
It has been reported in Ethiopia, neighboring East Africa and Central and South America.
The lesion begins as one skin nodule and progresses to widespread nodularity.
Slide 59 · Diffuse cutaneous histology has a high parasite burden
Foamy macrophages: Conceptual model
Foamy macrophages form aggregates within the lesions.
The cells may be densely packed with Leishmania organisms.
This contrasts with the pauciparasitic granulomas described for localized cutaneous disease.
Blue dot: Parasite nucleus Red dot: Kinetoplast
Original editable schematic — not a histologic or clinical specimen
Slide 60 · Localized versus diffuse cutaneous pathology
Feature
Localized cutaneous
Diffuse cutaneous
Clinical extent
Papule → localized ulcer
Progressively widespread nodules
Characteristic cells
Granulomas and giant cells
Aggregates of foamy macrophages
Organism burden
Few parasites in described lesions
Many organisms within macrophages
Natural history in source
Typical involution over months
Continued dissemination across skin
Slide 61 · Compare four leishmanial disease patterns
Form
Lesion or organ distribution
Signature microscopic or clinical clue
Visceral
Spleen, liver, marrow
Macrophage infiltration; Organomegaly and pancytopenia
Cutaneous
Localized exposed skin
Granulomas with giant cells; Few parasites
Mucocutaneous
Nasopharyngeal tissue
Inflammation evolves to granulomas and scarring
Diffuse cutaneous
Widespread skin nodules
Foamy macrophages packed with amastigotes
Slide 62 · The source recognizes three diagnostic approaches
Histologic examination can demonstrate tissue involvement and intracellular organisms.
Culture is listed as a diagnostic method.
PCR is also listed for detection of infection.
The text does not provide assay performance, optimal specimen algorithms or validated thresholds.
Slide 63 · Recognize parasite-containing macrophages
Schematic macrophage with amastigotes
Look for intracellular rounded forms within infected macrophages.
Each kinetoplast-containing protozoan has structures that help identify the stage.
This model is not a Giemsa stain and cannot establish a morphologic diagnosis.
Blue dot: Parasite nucleus Red dot: Kinetoplast
Original editable schematic — not a histologic or clinical specimen
Slide 64 · A tissue pattern alone does not identify Leishmania
Granulomatous inflammation is a tissue reaction, not a species-specific finding.
The diagnostic suspicion rests on compatible epidemiology, lesion pattern and direct testing.
When parasites are sparse, culture and PCR among additional approaches.
Slide 65 · Case application: Visceral disease
A patient from an endemic region develops fever, weight loss, marked splenomegaly and pancytopenia. Tissue evaluation identifies macrophages containing intracellular kinetoplastid organisms.
Interpretation
Most consistent form: Visceral leishmaniasis.
The mechanism combines systemic macrophage involvement with marrow and splenic pathology.
The source supports histology, culture and PCR as diagnostic approaches.
Slide 66 · Case application: A chronic skin ulcer
An exposed-skin papule slowly becomes a shallow ulcer with raised margins. A biopsy shows granulomas and giant cells, but only rare candidate parasites.
Interpretation
The pattern is compatible with localized cutaneous leishmaniasis.
A low parasite burden can accompany a strong granulomatous response.
Direct diagnostic evaluation is still needed; Morphology alone is not a species determination.
Slide 67 · Case application: A destructive mucosal lesion
A patient with relevant geographic exposure has a nasopharyngeal lesion that progresses to local destruction and later scars; The biopsy shows inflammatory cells and evolving granulomas.
Interpretation
The distribution raises mucocutaneous leishmaniasis as a consideration.
A later granulomatous phase may contain fewer visible parasites.
The source acknowledges reactivation after prolonged intervals without a defined mechanism.
Slide 68 · Case application: Progressive diffuse nodules
A single skin nodule gradually progresses to widespread nodules. Histologic sections show collections of foamy macrophages containing numerous amastigotes.
Interpretation
This is the source-described pattern of diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Prominent foamy, organism-packed macrophages contrast with localized pauciparasitic granulomas.
Slide 69 · Mechanistic synthesis: From vector to clinical syndrome
Sandfly promastigotes enter dermis and convert to macrophage amastigotes.
Survival depends on interactions with complement, neutrophils and intracellular phagocyte defenses.
Th1-dependent macrophage activation opposes persistence; Impaired cellular immunity increases susceptibility.
Parasite–host interaction and distribution generate distinct tissue patterns.
Slide 70 · Reference and interpretive boundaries
Primary: Robbins, Cotran & Kumar, Pathologic Basis of Disease, 11th ed. (2026), Chapter 8, “Leishmaniasis,” pp. 357–359.
The supplied Markdown is derived from extracted textbook text and includes column interleaving.
This deck excludes neighboring babesiosis, malaria and trypanosomiasis material.
No original chapter PDF or licensed source micrograph was provided; all illustrations are native editable schematics.