Request PowerPoint
PowerPoint animations are preserved in the original file.
Slide index (64)
- Loading slide titles…
Loading presentation…
Slide text will appear here when the presentation loads.
Swipe on touchscreens · Use ← / → to change slides, Home / End to jump.
Lecture topics
- A mitochondrial myopathy is often systemic
- Why paternal mtDNA is not the usual source
- A tissue-level threshold matters
- The extraocular ATP hypothesis is uncertain
- Mitochondrial accumulation in a myofiber
- A genotype does not uniquely specify a phenotype
- Leber hereditary optic neuropathy
- Primary reference and source limitations
Slide index & full transcript (64 slides)
Text from the original slides, in presentation order. Diagrams and images remain in the viewer above.
Slide 1 · Mitochondrial Myopathies
Molecular mechanisms · skeletal-muscle pathology · clinicogenetic syndromes
Dr Abu Suraih Sakhri
MBBS, MD (Pathology)
www.abusuraihsakhri.com
Slide 2 · Learning outcomes
Relate impaired mitochondrial ATP production to skeletal-muscle disease.
Contrast mtDNA and nuclear genetic inheritance.
Explain heteroplasmy, segregation and the threshold concept.
Recognize morphology and the named clinicogenetic syndromes.
Slide 3 · A mitochondrial myopathy is often systemic
Mitochondrial disease can involve many organs—not skeletal muscle alone.
Muscle weakness may coexist with neurologic, ocular or cardiac features.
Systemic manifestations are relevant when interpreting a muscle biopsy.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
Organ involvement is not restricted to one tissue.
Slide 4 · Impaired ATP generation is a central mechanism
Genetic lesion
Impaired mitochondrial function
Reduced ATP generation
Tissue dysfunction
Schematic sequence; Arrows denote conceptual progression.
Slide 5 · Why skeletal muscle can be affected
Skeletal-muscle fibers depend on adequate cellular energy supply.
Mitochondrial defects can therefore produce a primary myopathic phenotype.
Clinical involvement is variable rather than confined to one muscle group.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
Metabolic dysfunction can become structural and clinical muscle disease.
Slide 6 · From molecular defect to patient phenotype
Variant in relevant gene
Mitochondrial impairment
Susceptible tissue affected
Observed phenotype
Schematic sequence; Arrows denote conceptual progression.
Slide 7 · Two genomes contribute to mitochondrial function
NUCLEAR GENOME
MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME
Nuclear DNA
MtDNA
Mendelian inheritance
Maternal inheritance
Native vector schematic: Compartments are conceptual, not to anatomical scale.
Slide 8 · Mitochondrial proteins and tRNAs
Disorders need not arise from mutations in protein-coding mtDNA alone.
Mitochondrial tRNA genes are one source of pathogenic point mutations.
Altered mitochondrial metabolism is the common biologic theme.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
Genetic lesion ≠ single obligatory clinical syndrome.
Slide 9 · Inheritance depends on the affected genome
Nuclear genome
Mendelian inheritance
Both parental genomes contribute
Multiple possible inheritance patterns
Mitochondrial genome
Maternal inheritance
Oocyte supplies embryonic mitochondria
Heteroplasmy may complicate phenotype
Slide 10 · Maternal inheritance of mtDNA
Mother
Father
Children receive mitochondria via the oocyte.
Schematic maternal inheritance only; No quantitative risk is represented.
Slide 11 · Why paternal mtDNA is not the usual source
Mitochondrial inheritance to oocyte origin.
A paternal family pattern should not automatically be classified as mtDNA inheritance.
Determine whether the causal locus is nuclear or mitochondrial.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
Identify the gene location before interpreting a pedigree.
Slide 12 · Nuclear mutations require a separate framework
Nuclear disease gene
Typically two nuclear copies per somatic cell
Mendelian pedigree interpretation
Mitochondrial protein may still be affected
MtDNA variant
Many mitochondrial DNA copies per cell
Maternal inheritance
Heteroplasmy and cell-to-cell variance
Slide 13 · Inheritance pattern: A teaching decision
Locate affected gene
Nuclear DNA or mtDNA?
Apply inheritance pattern
Integrate phenotype
Schematic sequence; Arrows denote conceptual progression.
Slide 14 · A cell contains many mtDNA copies
Schematic: MtDNA copies within one cell
Many genome copies
Illustrative distribution; Marker counts do not represent measured mtDNA fractions.
Slide 15 · MtDNA copies partition during cell division
Parent cell
Daughter A
Daughter B
Random segregation can change the relative proportions.
Schematic only: No real copy numbers or quantitative segregation rates are implied.
Slide 16 · Heteroplasmy: Mixed mitochondrial genotypes
One cell can contain normal and altered mtDNA
One mtDNA population
Different mtDNA population
Schematic heteroplasmy; Number of symbols is not measured mutation burden.
Slide 17 · Random segregation creates tissue variability
Descendant cell groups may differ
Cell population A
Cell population B
Cell population C
Illustrative clonal variation after random segregation; No quantitative rates asserted.
Slide 18 · A threshold governs disease expression
Conceptual mutation burden
Below a functional threshold
Function may be preserved
Exceeds a functional threshold
Susceptible cells may show disease
No numerical threshold is asserted. This is a qualitative disease model.
Slide 19 · A tissue-level threshold matters
At-risk muscle tissue: A mixture of cells
Cells need not share the same functional state.
Schematic tissue heterogeneity; Colors are illustrative, not measured proportions.
Slide 20 · Why the same mutation can yield different disease
Same mtDNA lesion
Different burden / distribution
Different vulnerable organs
Different phenotype
Schematic sequence; Arrows denote conceptual progression.
Slide 21 · Integrated mitochondrial disease model
Genetic architecture
Two genomes and heterogeneous inheritance
Cellular energy deficit
Reduced mitochondrial ATP generation
Multisystem expression
Muscle and other organs can be affected
Conceptual summary; Categories are not quantitative or exhaustive.
Slide 22 · The clinical entry point may be weakness
Skeletal-muscle weakness is one possible presentation.
Robbins does not assign a single obligatory distribution of weakness.
The clinical pattern must be interpreted alongside extra-muscular findings.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
Weakness is compatible with mitochondrial disease, but is not specific.
Slide 23 · Serum creatine kinase may be elevated
Elevation of serum creatine kinase is one recognized manifestation.
An elevated CK indicates muscle injury rather than a unique mitochondrial cause.
The textbook does not provide a diagnostic CK cutoff for this category.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
Laboratory findings support a phenotype; They do not determine its gene.
Slide 24 · Rhabdomyolysis is a possible presentation
Mitochondrial dysfunction
Susceptible skeletal muscle
Severe muscle injury
Rhabdomyolysis
Schematic sequence; Arrows denote conceptual progression.
Slide 25 · Muscle involvement is anatomically variable
What may vary
Distribution of muscle weakness
Presence or absence of rhabdomyolysis
Degree of CK elevation
A useful clinical clue
Extraocular muscle involvement
Chronic progressive ophthalmoplegia
Associated systemic manifestations
Slide 26 · Extraocular muscle involvement is conspicuous
Extraocular muscles
CPEO may be isolated or syndromic.
Symbolic eye diagram; Not an anatomical drawing or clinical photograph.
Slide 27 · The extraocular ATP hypothesis is uncertain
High mitochondrial density
Possibly high ATP requirement
Sensitivity to energy failure
Ophthalmoplegia
Proposed mechanism, not proven explanation
Slide 28 · Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia
Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) is common in mitochondrial disease.
CPEO can occur alone or as part of a multisystem syndrome.
The ocular phenotype by itself does not define a unique mtDNA variant.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
CPEO describes a clinical phenotype, not one molecular diagnosis.
Slide 29 · Isolated versus syndromic ophthalmoplegia
Isolated CPEO
Ophthalmoplegia as predominant finding
Can reflect mtDNA point mutation or deletion
A phenotype, not a standalone genotype
Syndromic CPEO
Ophthalmoplegia with other organ involvement
Consider features of MELAS or Kearns–Sayre
Search for a coherent multisystem pattern
Slide 30 · Case 1: Progressive ocular muscle disease
Clinical reasoning prompt
A patient has gradually progressive extraocular muscle weakness.
A mitochondrial myopathy enters the differential diagnosis.
Question: Is ophthalmoplegia alone sufficient to name a specific mutation?
Slide 31 · Case 1: Interpret the phenotype correctly
Interpretation
No: Chronic progressive ophthalmoplegia is not mutation-specific.
The same genetic lesion can produce distinct clinical syndromes.
Assess the broader clinical pattern and select appropriate confirmatory studies.
Slide 32 · Muscle biopsy: The principal morphologic lesion
Myofiber cytoplasm
Subsarcolemmal aggregates
Sarcolemma
Schematic illustration — not a clinical specimen or microscopic image.
Slide 33 · What “ragged red” signifies
Mitochondrial aggregates
Peripheral fiber distribution
Reddish granules on Gomori stain
Schematic sequence; Arrows denote conceptual progression.
Slide 34 · Gomori trichrome is a morphology stain
No conspicuous aggregate
Ragged red pattern
Gomori trichrome pattern comparison — schematic only, not stained tissue.
Slide 35 · Subsarcolemmal position is diagnostically relevant
A peripheral rim of aggregates
Beneath the sarcolemma
Schematic cross section of a muscle fiber; Not a microscopy image.
Slide 36 · Mitochondrial accumulation in a myofiber
Conceptual comparison fiber
Affected fiber
Conceptual pattern distribution, not a specimen or observed fiber frequency.
Slide 37 · Ultrastructure may reveal abnormal mitochondria
Concentric membranous rings
Paracrystalline inclusion
Schematic illustration — not a patient electron micrograph.
Slide 38 · Concentric rings on electron microscopy
Enlarged native-vector depiction
Concentric intramitochondrial membranous rings
Schematic; “phonograph record” appearance Fig. 27.13.
Slide 39 · Paracrystalline inclusions are another EM clue
Enlarged native-vector depiction
Rhomboid inclusion with ordered internal pattern
Schematic only; Not an electron micrograph.
Slide 40 · Mitochondrial enzyme histochemistry
Cytochrome oxidase histochemistry (conceptual)
Some fibers may show deficient enzyme activity.
Hypothetical staining concept; No patient material or observed counts.
Slide 41 · A morphologically normal biopsy may not exclude disease
Some mitochondrial disorders lack conspicuous histologic changes.
Enzymatic assays or genetic analysis may be needed to establish diagnosis.
Do not demand ragged red fibers in every clinically compatible case.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
Absent ragged red fibers ≠ excluded mitochondrial disease.
Slide 42 · Three complementary lines of evidence
Morphology
Visible tissue phenotype
Enzyme activity
Functional mitochondrial evidence
Genetic analysis
Causative genetic information
Conceptual summary; Categories are not quantitative or exhaustive.
Slide 43 · Morphology, biochemistry and genetics differ
Method
Gomori trichrome or ultrastructure
Visible mitochondrial accumulation or structural abnormality
May be absent in some disorders
Principal information
Cytochrome oxidase / genetic assays
Enzyme activity or pathogenic genetic basis
May clarify otherwise inconspicuous disease
Slide 44 · A genotype does not uniquely specify a phenotype
One mtDNA mutation
Variable genetic / tissue context
Distinct organ involvement
Different syndromes
Schematic sequence; Arrows denote conceptual progression.
Slide 45 · Leucine tRNA: One mutation, different outcomes
Mitochondrial leucine tRNA point mutation
Isolated CPEO
MELAS
One lesion type can be associated with more than one clinical phenotype.
Slide 46 · CPEO and MELAS can share a point mutation
Isolated CPEO
Predominantly extraocular weakness
Chronic progressive ophthalmoplegia
May present without the described multisystem syndrome
MELAS phenotype
Encephalomyopathy
Lactic acidosis
Stroke-like episodes
Slide 47 · MELAS: Unpack the name
MELAS
M: Mitochondrial.
E: Encephalomyopathy.
LA: Lactic acidosis; S: Stroke-like episodes.
Slide 48 · MtDNA deletions can also yield different syndromes
MtDNA deletion
Isolated CPEO
Kearns–Sayre syndrome
One lesion type can be associated with more than one clinical phenotype.
Slide 49 · Kearns–Sayre syndrome: Characteristic features
Ophthalmoplegia
Chronic progressive extraocular weakness
Retinal degeneration
Pigmentary degeneration of retina
Complete heart block
Severe cardiac conduction manifestation
Conceptual summary; Categories are not quantitative or exhaustive.
Slide 50 · CPEO versus Kearns–Sayre
Isolated CPEO
Chronic external ophthalmoplegia
No defining retinal / conduction triad supplied
Narrower phenotype
Kearns–Sayre syndrome
Chronic external ophthalmoplegia
Pigmentary retinal degeneration
Complete heart block
Slide 51 · Case 2: Eye, retina and cardiac conduction
Clinical reasoning prompt
A patient has progressive external ophthalmoplegia.
The examination identifies pigmentary retinal degeneration and complete heart block.
Question: Which named mitochondrial syndrome best fits this cluster?
Slide 52 · Case 2: The syndromic diagnosis
Interpretation
The three-feature cluster is characteristic of Kearns–Sayre syndrome.
This syndrome to mtDNA deletions.
The pattern illustrates why ophthalmoplegia must be evaluated in clinical context.
Slide 53 · Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers
MERRF is another named mitochondrial disease.
It among diseases caused by point mutations in mtDNA.
Its name links a neurologic syndrome to a classic muscle-pathology feature.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
MERRF: A named mitochondrial syndrome with mtDNA point mutations.
Slide 54 · Leber hereditary optic neuropathy
Leber hereditary optic neuropathy is a mitochondrial disease example.
It among disorders associated with mtDNA point mutations.
Its presence in the list reinforces the potential importance of non-muscle organs.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
A mitochondrial disease phenotype may be dominated by extra-muscular findings.
Slide 55 · Leigh syndrome is genetically heterogeneous
Nuclear gene mutation
MtDNA mutation
Leigh syndrome
Multiple genes in either genome converge on mitochondrial metabolic dysfunction.
Slide 56 · Leigh syndrome: Common pathway, diverse genes
Many different genes
MtDNA or nuclear genome
Disrupted mitochondrial metabolism
Leigh syndrome
Schematic sequence; Arrows denote conceptual progression.
Slide 57 · Clinical syndromes: Pattern comparison
Entity
Core association
Genetic note
CPEO
Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia
May be isolated or syndromic
MELAS
Encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, stroke-like episodes
MtDNA point mutation example
Kearns–Sayre
Ophthalmoplegia, retina, complete heart block
Associated with mtDNA deletions
MERRF
Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers
MtDNA point mutations
Leber optic neuropathy
Optic neuropathy phenotype
MtDNA point mutations
Leigh syndrome
Subacute necrotizing encephalopathy
MtDNA and nuclear mutations
Slide 58 · Use morphology without overspecifying genotype
Clinical pattern
Ocular, muscle and other organ findings
Tissue phenotype
Tissue accumulation or enzyme defect
Molecular evidence
MtDNA or nuclear variant
Conceptual summary; Categories are not quantitative or exhaustive.
Slide 59 · Clinical and tissue evidence must be integrated
Clinical phenotype
Morphology, if informative
Enzyme / genetic evidence
Integrated interpretation
Schematic sequence; Arrows denote conceptual progression.
Slide 60 · A common diagnostic pitfall
Absence of ragged red fibers does not rule out mitochondrial disease.
A classic clinical syndrome may remain recognizable even with subtle morphology.
Robbins expressly allows enzyme- or genetics-based diagnosis.
Clinical / conceptual emphasis
Histologic visibility and molecular disease are not synonymous.
Slide 61 · Case 3: Same mutation, divergent presentation
Clinical reasoning prompt
Two patients are found to share a pathogenic mtDNA point mutation.
One has isolated CPEO; The other has MELAS-type multisystem features.
Question: Must one diagnosis be incorrect?
Slide 62 · Case 3: What explains divergence?
Interpretation
No: Different phenotypes may arise from a shared mitochondrial variant.
Robbins offers the leucine tRNA point-mutation example.
Heteroplasmy and tissue threshold effects supply a mechanistic framework.
Slide 63 · Synthesis: Five defensible conclusions
Many mitochondrial mutations interfere with ATP generation.
Nuclear and mitochondrial genes yield different inheritance patterns.
Heteroplasmy, segregation and tissue thresholds complicate expression.
Ragged red fibers are characteristic but not universal.
CPEO, MELAS, Kearns–Sayre, MERRF, LHON and Leigh illustrate clinical diversity.
Slide 64 · Primary reference and source limitations
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 11th ed. (2026).
Chapter 27, “Peripheral Nerves and Skeletal Muscles,” pp. 1123–1125.
Source: project-provided Markdown extraction; no original chapter PDF was available.
Microscopic figures here are native educational schematics, not patient specimens.