Request PowerPoint
PowerPoint animations are preserved in the original file.
Slide index (69)
- Loading slide titles…
Loading presentation…
Slide text will appear here when the presentation loads.
Swipe on touchscreens · Use ← / → to change slides, Home / End to jump.
Lecture topics
- A neoplasm of cells that migrate to skin
- Clonal T-cell receptor rearrangements
- Cutaneous distribution may become extensive
- Pautrier microabscesses are intraepidermal clusters
- Clonality is evidence, not a complete diagnosis
- Mycosis fungoides versus Sézary syndrome
- Case study: A persistent scaly patch
- Source references
Slide index & full transcript (69 slides)
Text from the original slides, in presentation order. Diagrams and images remain in the viewer above.
Slide 1 · MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: clinical course, biology and pathology
Dr Abu Suraih Sakhri
MBBS, MD (Pathology)
www.abusuraihsakhri.com
Slide 2 · Learning objectives
Define mycosis fungoides within the cutaneous T-cell lymphoma spectrum.
Explain skin homing, clonality and the limits of molecular specificity.
Correlate patch, plaque and tumor lesions with microscopic patterns.
Interpret progression, Sézary syndrome and treatment context.
Slide 3 · A neoplasm of cells that migrate to skin
Mycosis fungoides is discussed among tumors of cellular migrants to skin.
The malignant lineage is lymphoid, not keratinocytic or melanocytic.
Its clinical appearance reflects tissue localization by transformed T cells.
T-cell lineage
Cutaneous homing
Skin-based lymphoma
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 4 · Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is a spectrum
CTCL denotes multiple lymphoproliferative disorders involving the skin.
Mycosis fungoides is a defined clinicopathologic member of that spectrum.
Not every CTCL has the clinical evolution of mycosis fungoides.
Umbrella category
Several distinct presentations
Mycosis fungoides
Characteristic patches → plaques → tumors
Slide 5 · Core definition: A skin-homing helper T-cell lymphoma
The prototypic cells are CD4+ helper T lymphocytes with cutaneous tropism.
Lesions generally begin in skin; Overt extracutaneous disease is late.
Diagnosis rests on integration of clinical and pathologic patterns.
CD4+ • skin-homing • clonal
Slide 6 · An often prolonged cutaneous phase
Most patients have skin-localized disease for years.
This clinical indolence does not negate the neoplastic nature of the process.
A subset eventually develops tumors or extracutaneous disease.
Skin-only phase
Progressive lesions
Possible systemic spread
Time and progression are variable
Slide 7 · Age distribution does not exclude the diagnosis
Mycosis fungoides may develop at any age.
The disease as most common after 40 years of age.
In compatible lesions, age alone should not substitute for morphology.
Slide 8 · The trunk is a frequent site of disease
Early lesions commonly occur on truncal skin.
With broader cutaneous involvement, extremities, face and scalp may be affected.
Anatomic distribution is clinically useful but not independently diagnostic.
Trunk
Extremities
Face and scalp
Illustrative anatomic distribution
Slide 9 · Why CD4+ tumor cells accumulate in skin
Tumor cells express adhesion and chemokine-homing molecules.
Cutaneous lymphocyte antigen contributes to skin localization.
CCR4 is additionally highlighted in the lymphoid chapter.
Neoplastic CD4+ T cell
CLA / CCR4-associated homing
Epidermis + dermis
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 10 · Cutaneous lymphocyte antigen: Tissue targeting
Cutaneous lymphocyte antigen is associated with T-cell trafficking to skin.
Its expression provides a mechanistic link between lineage and site.
Skin localization reflects homing biology, not epithelial origin.
CLA → cutaneous localization
Slide 11 · CCR4 adds a chemokine-receptor component
The Chapter 13 discussion identifies CCR4 in skin-homing tumor cells.
Chemokine receptors participate in positioning T cells within tissues.
Cutaneous trafficking helps explain persistent skin lesions.
CCR4 expression
Homing interaction
Cutaneous retention
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 12 · Clonal T-cell receptor rearrangements
Mycosis fungoides cells represent a clonal T-cell population.
Clonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangements support shared lineage.
Clonality must be interpreted with clinicopathologic findings.
T-cell clone
Shared TCR rearrangement
Persistent lesion
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 13 · Genetic abnormalities are heterogeneous
Changes involving oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes occur in CTCL.
Robbins does not identify a single mutation specific to this entity.
No one mutation should be portrayed as its defining genetic test.
Heterogeneous drivers
Multiple altered pathways
No disease-specific driver
Diagnosis remains integrated
Slide 14 · A characteristic clinical-pathologic constellation
Domain
Typical observation
Interpretive role
Clinical
Persistent patches, plaques or tumors
Pattern recognition
Histologic
Dermal band + epidermotropism
Tissue pattern
Biologic
CD4+ T cells; clonal rearrangement
Lineage support
Slide 15 · Skin lesions form a clinical continuum
The classic course is patch → plaque → tumor.
The phases are useful teaching categories, not mandatory uniform steps.
Different lesion morphologies may coexist in an individual.
PATCH
Flat + scaling
PLAQUE
Raised + scaling
TUMOR
Nodular growth
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 16 · Patch lesions: Subtle cutaneous disease
Flat erythematous or red-brown areas may show surface scale.
Early lesions may resemble eczema.
A persistent patch can precede more overt lymphoma for years.
Flat erythematous patch
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 17 · The premycotic phase can appear inflammatory
An eczematous presentation is typical of early mycosis fungoides.
Obvious nodal or visceral dissemination is absent at this phase.
Morphologic subtlety is a major reason for diagnostic uncertainty.
Clinical surface
Eczema-like patch
Underlying process
Neoplastic T cells in skin
Slide 18 · Plaque lesions: Raised and indurated
Plaques become elevated, scaling and erythematous.
Irregular outlines and firmness may emerge.
The appearance can be confused with psoriasis.
Raised indurated plaque
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 19 · Why plaque disease may mimic psoriasis
Both processes can produce red, thickened, scaling plaques.
The distinction therefore requires more than a descriptive skin examination.
In mycosis fungoides, atypical T-cell epidermotropism is informative.
Visible similarity
Erythema + scale + thickening
Decisive difference
Neoplastic lymphoid tissue pattern
Slide 20 · Tumor-stage lesions are distinct from plaques
Advanced lesions may form nodules with a fungating surface.
Deep dermal growth contributes to nodule formation.
Tumor development is associated with aggressive clinical behavior.
Nodule with protruding growth
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 21 · Ulceration can complicate advanced lesions
Plaques or tumor nodules can ulcerate.
Ulceration is a feature of some lesions, not a required diagnostic sign.
The microscopic and clinical context must still establish the entity.
Ulcerated advanced lesion
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 22 · Cutaneous distribution may become extensive
Disease may expand beyond the trunk.
Extremities, face and scalp can eventually be affected.
Anatomic extension increases the need for systematic skin assessment.
Truncal lesions
Additional skin sites
Widespread involvement
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 23 · Patch, plaque and tumor are not synonyms
Form
Gross appearance
Broad significance
Patch
Flat, scaly erythematous area
Often early presentation
Plaque
Raised, indurated scaling lesion
More established skin disease
Tumor
Fungating or nodular mass
Advanced cutaneous burden
Slide 24 · Clinical evolution is often slow
Progression between forms may occur over prolonged intervals.
Many patients remain localized to skin.
Late nodal or visceral dissemination is a distinct clinical change.
Long patch phase
Possible plaque development
Possible tumor/systemic phase
Time and progression are variable
Slide 25 · Skin-surface burden influences prognosis
Outcome to the percentage of body surface involved.
Extent of cutaneous involvement is not merely cosmetic severity.
This source does not provide numerical staging thresholds.
Limited skin burden
More extensive skin burden
Tumors or systemic involvement
Qualitative risk relationships — no numeric cut-offs implied
Slide 26 · Tumor nodules indicate greater risk
The appearance of tumor nodules correlates with systemic spread.
Nodular transformation reflects altered tissue growth behavior.
Tumor presence is associated with more aggressive disease.
Nodules appear
Deeper dermal growth
Higher-risk course
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 27 · Extracutaneous spread changes the interpretation
Overt spread to lymph nodes or viscera is usually a late event.
Presence of systemic disease is linked with a worse prognosis.
Circulating cells alone are not equivalent to overt organ infiltration.
Cutaneous disease
Overt nodal / visceral involvement
Higher disease burden
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 28 · Normal skin compartments orient the biopsy
Epidermis overlies the papillary and deeper dermis.
Mycosis fungoides combines superficial dermal infiltration with epidermal involvement.
Different clinical phases shift the depth and distribution of atypical cells.
Epidermis
Dermis
No neoplastic lymphocytes shown
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 29 · Superficial dermal band of atypical cells
A band-like population of atypical lymphocytes collects in superficial dermis.
This localization is a characteristic morphologic clue.
Band-like distribution must be assessed along with epidermotropism.
Epidermis
Dermis
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 30 · Epidermotropism: Lymphocytes enter epidermis
Atypical T cells infiltrate epidermis as individual cells.
The finding distinguishes epidermal infiltration from a purely dermal band.
Epidermotropism is prominent in many patch and plaque lesions.
Epidermis
Dermis
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 31 · Pautrier microabscesses are intraepidermal clusters
Small groups of atypical lymphocytes can collect within the epidermis.
These clusters are termed Pautrier microabscesses.
They are lymphoid collections, not neutrophilic abscesses.
Epidermis
Dermis
Cluster
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 32 · Nuclear folding produces cerebriform contours
Atypical lymphocytes may show markedly infolded nuclear membranes.
The resulting outline appears convoluted or cerebriform.
Nuclear contour complements, rather than replaces, assessment of architecture.
Convoluted nuclear outline
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 33 · Patch-stage histology may be subtle
The infiltrate may be superficial and limited in density.
Epidermotropism can be present despite a clinically understated lesion.
An inflammatory-appearing specimen does not automatically exclude MF.
Epidermis
Dermis
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 34 · Plaque-stage histology emphasizes epidermotropism
Plaques frequently contain conspicuous epidermal atypical lymphocytes.
An expanded superficial dermal infiltrate may coexist.
Pautrier microabscesses can be seen in this setting.
Epidermis
Dermis
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 35 · Tumor-stage histology becomes deeply dermal
Malignant lymphocytes grow more extensively within dermis.
The deep infiltrate produces clinically appreciable nodules.
Tumor lesions may show less epidermotropism than earlier patches.
Epidermis
Dermis
Dense deeper growth
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 36 · Epidermotropism can diminish as tumors develop
Patch/plaque disease typically involves the epidermis prominently.
Advanced tumor-stage cells can grow deeply and lose epidermotropism.
An absent epidermotropic pattern does not exclude advanced MF.
Patch / plaque
Epidermal infiltration conspicuous
Tumor
Deeper growth; Often reduced epidermotropism
Slide 37 · A single biopsy field is not the whole diagnosis
Assess
Question
Why it matters
Distribution
Where are cells concentrated?
Superficial vs deep
Epidermis
Single cells or clusters?
Epidermotropism
Nuclei
Convoluted contours?
Cytologic support
Clinical form
Patch, plaque or nodule?
Stage correlation
Slide 38 · Morphology and clinical phase are linked
Clinical form
Dominant microscopic emphasis
Visible correlate
Patch
Superficial sparse infiltrate; epidermotropism
Flat scaly lesion
Plaque
Dermal band and epidermal atypical cells
Thickened scaling plaque
Tumor
Dense deeper dermal infiltrate
Nodular mass
Slide 39 · Diagnosis integrates several lines of evidence
A compatible lesion history prompts a representative skin biopsy.
Morphology establishes the distribution of atypical lymphocytes.
T-cell phenotype and clonality can provide corroboration.
Clinical pattern
Biopsy architecture
T-cell studies
Integrated judgment
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 40 · The T-cell phenotype is supportive
MF is most often associated with a CD4+ helper T-cell population.
Surface T-cell antigens may be aberrantly combined.
Phenotype must be interpreted with morphology and clinical presentation.
Expected lineage
CD4+ helper T cell
Possible aberrancy
Unusual T-cell antigen combinations
Slide 41 · Clonality is evidence, not a complete diagnosis
T-cell receptor rearrangements can demonstrate a shared clone.
A molecular result does not reveal lesion architecture or clinical course.
The final diagnosis is clinicopathologic, not a single-assay label.
Molecular information
Presence of a T-cell clone
Clinical/pathologic information
Whether findings fit MF
Slide 42 · Early MF requires careful differential diagnosis
Consideration
Shared appearance
Useful distinction
Eczema-like dermatitis
Erythematous scaly patch
Persistence + atypical epidermotropic cells
Psoriasis
Scaling plaque
Lymphoid infiltrate architecture
Other CTCL
Cutaneous T-cell lesion
Entity-specific clinical presentation
Slide 43 · Eczema-like lesions are not always eczema
MF may initially present as an inflammatory-appearing patch.
Discordance between persistent lesions and a nonspecific label deserves review.
The biopsy should be correlated with the lesion selected for sampling.
Clinical mimic
Chronic eczematous patch
Pathologic concern
Atypical lymphocytes in epidermis
Slide 44 · Psoriasis-like plaques require tissue correlation
Scale and erythema occur in both disorders.
Raised plaque morphology alone does not establish a neoplasm.
In MF, lymphoid epidermotropism and cytologic atypia are key clues.
Psoriasiform surface
Scale and thickening
MF-specific concern
Atypical epidermotropic T-cell infiltrate
Slide 45 · Repeated evaluation may be necessary in subtle cases
Early patch-stage histology may be difficult to classify conclusively.
Review of persistent lesions and additional biopsies can be necessary.
An equivocal sample should not be forced into a definitive diagnosis.
Persistent atypical rash
Clinicopathologic review
Repeat sampling if justified
Time and progression are variable
Slide 46 · Recognize a diagnostic pitfall in tumor disease
Tumor-stage lesions can lose classic epidermotropism.
Relying only on epidermal infiltrates risks overlooking advanced disease.
Clinical evolution and dermal lymphoid morphology remain relevant.
Epidermis
Dermis
Dense deeper growth
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 47 · Sézary syndrome: A related but distinct entity
Both diseases involve skin-homing CD4+ T-cell neoplasms.
Sézary syndrome has generalized erythroderma, blood involvement and nodes.
The clinical courses and patterns of tumefaction differ.
Mycosis fungoides
Patches, plaques, possible tumors
Sézary syndrome
Erythroderma + blood + nodes
Slide 48 · Generalized erythroderma defines the skin picture in Sézary
Sézary syndrome typically manifests with diffuse exfoliative erythroderma.
This differs from the usual evolution of discrete MF lesions.
Generalized lymphadenopathy commonly accompanies it.
Erythroderma + lymphadenopathy
Slide 49 · Blood involvement distinguishes Sézary syndrome
Sézary syndrome includes leukemia of circulating neoplastic cells.
These cells characteristically display cerebriform nuclear contours.
Blood findings are interpreted together with skin and nodes.
Diffuse erythroderma
Sézary cells in blood
Generalized nodes
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 50 · Mycosis fungoides versus Sézary syndrome
Feature
Mycosis fungoides
Sézary syndrome
Skin
Patch → plaque → tumor
Diffuse exfoliative erythroderma
Blood
Sensitive tests may detect cells early
Overt leukemic involvement
Tumors
May develop
Skin tumefaction uncommon
Overall course
Often indolent
Typically more aggressive
Slide 51 · Early cell circulation does not equal overt systemic disease
Sensitive analyses can detect MF cells in blood, nodes or marrow early.
Clinically evident extracutaneous disease usually develops much later.
This distinction reconciles biological trafficking with cutaneous indolence.
Sensitive detection
Tumor cells may circulate
Overt dissemination
Usually a late clinical event
Slide 52 · Outcome in mycosis fungoides is variable
MF often progresses indolently with prolonged skin localization.
Chapter 13 reports a median survival of approximately 10 years.
Extent, tumor nodules and systemic involvement modify prognosis.
Limited skin burden
More extensive skin burden
Tumors or systemic involvement
Qualitative risk relationships — no numeric cut-offs implied
Slide 53 · Sézary syndrome generally has a worse course
Chapter 13 characterizes Sézary syndrome as more aggressive than MF.
It reports that only a minority remain alive five years after diagnosis.
Population-level statements cannot predict an individual patient.
MF
Often prolonged cutaneous course
Sézary
More aggressive systemic behavior
Slide 54 · Aggressive transformation can occur late
MF occasionally evolves into aggressive T-cell lymphoma.
This as a possible terminal event.
New aggressive clinical changes warrant reconsideration of disease biology.
Indolent MF
Occasional transformation
Aggressive T-cell lymphoma
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 55 · Skin-directed therapy targets early lesions
Localized patches and plaques are commonly managed with skin-directed measures.
Topical steroids and ultraviolet light.
The rationale is disease largely confined to cutaneous compartments.
Early skin disease
Local cutaneous therapy
Lesion control
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 56 · Topical corticosteroids: Early-lesion approach
Topical steroids as a treatment option for early MF.
The treatment acts at the site of visible disease.
The text does not specify regimens or response percentages.
Setting
Early skin lesions
Treatment modality
Topical steroid therapy
Slide 57 · Ultraviolet therapy is another skin-directed option
Ultraviolet light therapy is cited for early skin lesions.
Phototherapy is distinct from systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Treatment choice must account for burden and stage.
Cutaneous lesions
Ultraviolet light exposure
Skin-directed management
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 58 · Advanced disease may require systemic treatment
Systemic chemotherapy for more aggressive disease.
Clinical tumor development or extracutaneous disease changes management.
Therapeutic details beyond this principle require specialist guidance.
Early skin disease
Topical / UV modalities
Advanced aggressive disease
Systemic treatment
Slide 59 · Follow-up focuses on meaningful change
Assess new plaque thickening, tumors, ulceration and broader skin involvement.
Look for evidence of clinically overt extracutaneous disease.
Clinical progression should trigger renewed clinicopathologic assessment.
Skin burden
Tumor emergence
Systemic features
Risk reassessment
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 60 · Case study: A persistent scaly patch
Hypothetical teaching case
A hypothetical patient aged 54 has a chronic red-brown, scaling truncal patch.
The lesion has been described as eczema-like but persists.
Question: Which tissue feature would most strengthen concern for MF?
Slide 61 · Case interpretation: Subtle clinical disease
Reasoning
Persistence and a truncal patch are compatible but not pathognomonic.
Biopsy can disclose atypical epidermotropic T cells.
Clonality and immunophenotype may support an integrated diagnosis.
Clinical suspicion → representative biopsy → integrated interpretation.
Slide 62 · Case study: Progression to a nodule
Hypothetical teaching case
A patient with long-standing scaling plaques develops a fungating nodule.
The tumor contains a dense population of atypical cells deep in the dermis.
Question: Must prominent epidermotropism still be present?
Slide 63 · Case interpretation: A changed tissue pattern
Reasoning
Nodule formation corresponds to greater dermal tumor burden.
Epidermotropism may diminish in advanced nodular lesions.
New tumors also alter assessment of prognosis and systemic spread.
Deep dermal growth can dominate tumor-stage disease.
Slide 64 · Morphology challenge: Identify the pattern
Superficial dermal band plus intraepidermal atypical cells:
What is the name for individual-cell epidermal migration?
What is the name for small intraepidermal clusters?
Epidermis
Dermis
Cluster
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 65 · Morphology challenge: Terms and interpretation
Observation
Term
Interpretation
Atypical cells within epidermis
Epidermotropism
Neoplastic cells cross tissue boundary
Small intraepidermal clusters
Pautrier microabscesses
Focal lymphoid aggregates
Convoluted lymphoid nuclei
Cerebriform contour
Atypical cell morphology
Slide 66 · Integrating the disease in one mechanism
Clonal, skin-homing CD4+ T cells underlie the lymphoma.
Superficial dermal and epidermal infiltration produces early lesions.
Progressive dermal growth and eventual spread explain advanced disease.
Skin-homing T-cell clone
Epidermotropism
Patch / plaque
Tumor ± dissemination
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 67 · High-yield discriminators
If you see…
Think about…
Do not forget…
Scaly chronic truncal patches
Possible early MF
Inflammatory mimics
Superficial band + epidermotropism
Characteristic MF morphology
Clinical correlation
Deep dermal tumor; little epidermotropism
Advanced tumor-stage MF
Epidermotropism can wane
Erythroderma + blood disease + nodes
Sézary syndrome
Different clinical entity
Slide 68 · Core teaching conclusions
MF is a skin-homing, usually CD4+ clonal T-cell lymphoma.
Clinical lesions classically evolve through patch, plaque and tumor patterns.
Band-like dermal infiltrates, epidermotropism and Pautrier clusters are key clues.
Tumor nodules and overt systemic spread indicate higher-risk disease.
Slide 69 · Source references
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 11th ed. 2026. Chapter 25, pp. 1044–1046.
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 11th ed. 2026. Chapter 13, pp. 551–552.
DermNet. Mycosis fungoides pathology (supplementary diagnostic context). https://dermnetnz.org/topics/mycosis-fungoides-pathology