Request PowerPoint
PowerPoint animations are preserved in the original file.
Slide index (75)
- Loading slide titles…
Loading presentation…
Slide text will appear here when the presentation loads.
Swipe on touchscreens · Use ← / → to change slides, Home / End to jump.
Lecture topics
- What this lecture will establish
- Adiposity and metabolic risk
- PanIN is the dominant precursor
- SMAD4: Defective TGF-β growth regulation
- Microscopy: Infiltrative malignant gland formation
- Less common histologic variants
- Population screening versus high-risk surveillance
- Primary reference and visual provenance
Slide index & full transcript (75 slides)
Text from the original slides, in presentation order. Diagrams and images remain in the viewer above.
Slide 1 · Pancreatic Carcinoma
Ductal adenocarcinoma
Ductal adenocarcinoma: molecular pathogenesis, morphology and clinical implications
Molecular pathogenesis | Morphology | Clinicopathologic correlation
Dr Abu Suraih Sakhri
MBBS, MD (Pathology)
www.abusuraihsakhri.com
Slide 2 · What this lecture will establish
Identify the defining pathologic features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Explain major risk factors, precursors and molecular alterations.
Connect tumor location and invasive behavior with clinical presentation.
Interpret the limits of detection and the importance of resectability.
Slide 3 · Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: The entity
Infiltrating ductal adenocarcinoma is the most common exocrine malignancy of the pancreas.
Neoplastic epithelium forms malignant glands and often produces mucin.
Deep invasion, marked desmoplasia and late diagnosis dominate its behavior.
Exocrine ductal phenotype + infiltrative growth + fibrotic stroma
Slide 4 · Exocrine versus endocrine pancreatic tumors
DUCTAL / EXOCRINE
The subject of this lecture
Gland-forming, mucin-producing epithelial malignancy
Typically marked desmoplasia
ENDOCRINE
Distinct pancreatic neoplasm group
Discussed elsewhere
Do not equate with PDAC
Scope: Infiltrating exocrine ductal adenocarcinoma, not pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.
Slide 5 · A high-fatality malignancy
12%
Five-year survival reported
Textbook estimate refers to the population reflected by its data.
This is not a stage-specific or individual prognostic estimate.
Late presentation is the dominant explanatory factor.
Slide 6 · Most patients present beyond surgery
>80%
Unresectable at initial presentation
Vascular/adjacent-structure involvement can prevent resection.
Some patients already have distant metastatic disease.
Earlier detection before dissemination is therefore critical.
Slide 7 · Pancreatic cancer: Anatomic distribution
Site
Approximate proportion
Pathologic/clinical implication
Head
60%
Often obstructs the distal common bile duct
Body
15%
May enlarge before causing biliary symptoms
Tail
5%
Usually no early biliary obstruction
Diffuse pancreatic involvement
20%
Disease extends through the pancreas
Percentages are approximate and come from the source morphology section.
Slide 8 · Anatomic location predicts obstruction
Bile duct
Head
Body
Tail
Head mass
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
Carcinoma in the head lies near the intrapancreatic common bile duct.
Distal common bile duct obstruction causes upstream biliary dilatation.
Body and tail tumors may remain clinically occult longer.
Slide 9 · Age distribution
Pancreatic carcinoma is predominantly a disease of older adults.
That 80% of cases occur after age 60.
Age influences pretest probability but is not a stand-alone diagnostic criterion.
Slide 10 · Cigarette smoking as an established exposure
Smoking is described as the strongest environmental influence.
The source reports approximately twice the risk among smokers.
Smoking is a risk factor; Most smokers do not develop pancreatic cancer.
Risk ≠ diagnosis; Population associations should not be applied deterministically.
Slide 11 · How chronic pancreatitis increases risk
Chronic inflammation
Tissue injury and repair
Increased neoplastic risk
Association grounded in the source; This diagram is not a deterministic progression.
Slide 12 · Adiposity and metabolic risk
Visceral obesity and high body mass index are associated with greater risk.
Established diabetes mellitus is a modest risk factor.
These associations complement inherited and smoking-related susceptibility.
Slide 13 · Diabetes: Risk factor or early consequence?
PRE-EXISTING DIABETES
Modest epidemiologic risk factor
May precede malignant transformation
Not diagnostic of pancreatic carcinoma
NEW-ONSET DIABETES
Can precede recognition of occult carcinoma
Especially relevant in older patients
Requires clinical context, not indiscriminate screening
The temporal direction of the association is crucial.
Slide 14 · A possible preclinical metabolic signal
≤2 years
Diabetes or abnormal glucose tolerance before clinical signs
The source states that up to half of patients show this abnormality within this interval.
It is a possible opportunity for earlier recognition.
It is not sufficiently specific to diagnose PDAC alone.
Slide 15 · Population differences in incidence
The source reports increased incidence in African Americans, Japanese Americans, Native Hawaiian Islanders and Ashkenazi Jewish people.
Population patterns do not define causation in an individual.
Clinical assessment still depends on symptoms, inherited risk and diagnostic findings.
Slide 16 · Hereditary contribution
~10%
Patients with a deleterious germline predisposition or a first-degree family history
Family history and germline mutation status are overlapping—but not identical—concepts.
DNA repair genes are prominent among inherited predisposition genes.
Identifying a familial mutation has implications for relatives.
Slide 17 · DNA repair genes in familial pancreatic cancer
BRCA2 and ATM are highlighted as common known familial predisposition genes.
BRCA1 and PALB2 are additional DNA repair-related susceptibility genes.
These inherited defects are distinct from acquired tumor mutations.
Slide 18 · Inherited predisposition: Selected syndromes
Context
Selected genes
Teaching significance
Peutz–Jeghers syndrome
STK11
Strong predisposition in textbook
Hereditary pancreatitis
PRSS1, SPINK1
Pancreatic injury plus inherited susceptibility
Familial atypical multiple-mole melanoma
CDKN2A
Hereditary tumor-suppressor predisposition
Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer
BRCA1/2, PALB2, ATM
DNA repair pathway involvement
Selected inherited predisposition syndromes; Comparison not exhaustive.
Slide 19 · Additional inherited risk settings
Setting
Molecular/family basis
Clinical implication
Lynch syndrome
DNA mismatch-repair genes
Pancreatic risk and possible mismatch-repair deficiency
Strong pancreatic family history
Several affected relatives
Elevated inherited risk even without an identified gene
First-degree relative of a mutation carrier
Shared familial variant possible
Genetic counseling/cascade assessment
Slide 20 · From index case to familial risk recognition
Pancreatic cancer diagnosis
Germline testing
Pathogenic variant detected
Counseling and cascade testing
Robbins recommends germline testing for all patients with pancreatic cancer.
Slide 21 · Genetic results can inform therapy
Germline and tumor DNA repair defects may define therapeutic vulnerabilities.
Mismatch-repair deficiency and microsatellite instability are potentially actionable.
Do not confuse a susceptibility marker with proof of a particular treatment response.
Slide 22 · Precursor lesions establish a progression model
Most pancreatic cancers are believed to arise from microscopic PanIN lesions.
A smaller fraction arise from recognizable mucinous cystic precursors.
The distinction is important for interpreting precursor morphology and early detection.
Slide 23 · PanIN is the dominant precursor
>85%
Estimated pancreatic cancers arising from PanIN
PanIN develops in small pancreatic ducts and is often microscopic.
Low-grade PanIN can be encountered in older individuals.
High-grade PanIN is uncommon without associated invasive carcinoma.
Slide 24 · Low-grade versus high-grade PanIN
LOW-GRADE PanIN
Microscopic intraductal epithelial atypia
Formerly classified as PanIN-1A/1B/2
May be isolated, particularly in older patients
HIGH-GRADE PanIN
Markedly dysplastic precursor epithelium
Formerly termed PanIN-3 / carcinoma in situ
Often found with invasive carcinoma
Both are noninvasive; Invasion is a separate decisive event.
Slide 25 · Evidence connecting PanIN with carcinoma
PanIN and PDAC share multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations.
PanIN often occurs in non-neoplastic pancreas adjacent to PDAC.
Engineered mouse models and rare longitudinal human reports support progression.
Slide 26 · PanIN progression: Conceptual stages
Normal small duct
Low-grade PanIN
High-grade PanIN
Invasive carcinoma
Model of cumulative alterations; Not every lesion necessarily progresses.
Slide 27 · Telomere erosion occurs early
The source describes striking telomere shortening in PanIN epithelial cells.
Short telomeres may favor chromosomal instability and accumulation of alterations.
Telomere shortening is a pathobiologic feature—not a routine diagnostic assay.
Slide 28 · Cumulative mutation burden matters more than order
A general sequence of molecular events.
Individual lesions need not acquire alterations in a rigid chronological order.
Progressive loss of regulatory safeguards facilitates invasion.
Progression model: A framework, not an obligatory genetic itinerary.
Slide 29 · KRAS: Early oncogenic activation
KRAS activation
Increased growth-signaling input
Clonal expansion
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
Activating KRAS mutations are the most frequent oncogenic event.
KRAS functions as a growth-signal transducer.
Early KRAS activation alone does not establish invasive cancer.
Slide 30 · KRAS alteration is exceptionally common
>90%
PDACs with activating KRAS mutation
KRAS is located at chromosome 12p.
Mutation frequency refers to pancreatic carcinomas, not all pancreatic tumors.
Ongoing trials targeting mutant RAS proteins.
Slide 31 · CDKN2A: Impaired cell-cycle restraint
CDKN2A / p16 loss
Reduced cell-cycle restraint
Proliferation permitted
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
CDKN2A at 9p encodes p16/INK4a and ARF tumor suppressors.
Its loss weakens normal safeguards against inappropriate proliferation.
Inactivation in approximately 30% of PDAC.
Slide 32 · TP53: Compromised response to DNA damage
TP53 loss
Impaired damage response
Abnormal cells persist
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
TP53 at 17p encodes p53, a tumor suppressor.
Its inactivation undermines cellular responses to DNA damage.
The source reports alteration in 70–75% of carcinomas.
Slide 33 · SMAD4: Defective TGF-β growth regulation
SMAD4 loss
Perturbed TGF-β signaling
Reduced regulatory restraint
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
SMAD4 at 18q participates in TGF-β pathway signaling.
It is inactivated in approximately 55% of PDAC.
Loss is relatively uncommon across other cancer types, but not exclusive to PDAC.
Slide 34 · Core molecular alterations in PDAC
Gene
Role
Approximate alteration frequency
KRAS
Oncogenic signal transducer
>90%
TP53
DNA damage response
70–75%
SMAD4
TGF-β pathway tumor suppressor
55%
CDKN2A
Cell-cycle restraint (p16/ARF)
30%
Frequencies are textbook estimates; A tumor may harbor several alterations simultaneously.
Slide 35 · Less-common molecular events
Group
Selected genes
Interpretation
DNA damage response
ATM, BRCA2
Subset with DNA repair defects
Chromatin regulation
ARID1A, KMT2C, KDM6A
Altered transcriptional control
Growth signaling
AKT2, BRAF, MYC
Additional oncogenic mechanisms
Wnt-associated restraint
RNF43
Disrupted pathway regulation
Selected molecular alterations; Not an exhaustive diagnostic panel.
Slide 36 · Epigenetic dysregulation
Promoter hypermethylation
Tumor-suppressor silencing
Reduced growth control
Example: CDKN2A silencing. Hypomethylation can have the opposite transcriptional effect.
Slide 37 · Two transcriptomic phenotypes
BASAL-LIKE
Transcriptomic subtype
More aggressive behavior reported
Can coexist with classic subtype elements
CLASSICAL
Transcriptomic subtype
Relatively more favorable prognosis
May shift under treatment pressure
Basal-like/classic phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity; Clinical selection is still under investigation.
Slide 38 · Tumor heterogeneity changes interpretation
Different molecular phenotypes may coexist within one tumor.
Expression programs can show plasticity during chemotherapy.
A subtype assignment need not represent every tumor cell at every time point.
Slide 39 · Microscopic versus cystic precursor routes
PanIN ROUTE
Small ducts; Usually microscopic
Histologic low-grade/high-grade progression
Major presumed source of PDAC
CYSTIC MUCINOUS ROUTE
Macroscopic lesions may be detectable
IPMN and mucinous cystic neoplasm
Subset progresses to invasive carcinoma
Related topics are used only to explain the origin of invasive ductal cancer.
Slide 40 · IPMN: A duct-centered precursor
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm involves main or branch pancreatic ducts.
Neoplastic epithelium secretes mucin and can progress to invasion.
GNAS mutations are characteristic of IPMN relative to other cyst types.
Slide 41 · Mucinous cystic neoplasm as a precursor
Mucin-producing cystic epithelium sits above ovarian-type stroma.
These neoplasms tend to occur in the pancreatic tail and in women.
An invasive adenocarcinoma can arise within a mucinous cystic neoplasm.
Slide 42 · Gross carcinoma: A firm ill-defined mass
Bile duct
Head
Body
Tail
Firm, ill-defined
Lesion
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
Tumor invasion and stromal collagen produce a hard mass.
Gray-white, stellate, poorly demarcated lesions.
A duct-centered infiltrative mass can blend into adjacent pancreatic parenchyma.
Slide 43 · Why the pancreatic mass becomes desmoplastic
Atypical glands
Fibrotic stroma
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
Cancer-associated fibroblastic response deposits dense collagen.
Malignant duct-like glands are embedded in abundant non-neoplastic stroma.
The fibrotic component may dominate a small needle biopsy.
Slide 44 · Microscopy: Infiltrative malignant gland formation
Atypical glands
Fibrotic stroma
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
Abortive, irregular tubular structures and small cell clusters infiltrate tissue.
Cells range from cuboidal to columnar with nuclear pleomorphism.
Glands are surrounded by dense fibrotic stroma.
Slide 45 · Architectural clues to invasion
Malignant glands are irregularly distributed rather than neatly organized around preserved ducts.
Deep infiltration into peripancreatic tissue supports invasive behavior.
Perineural, lymphatic or vascular invasion supplies additional evidence.
Slide 46 · Carcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis
DUCTAL CARCINOMA
Haphazard atypical invasive glands
Perineural / vascular invasion may be present
Desmoplastic tumor-associated stroma
CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
Benign ducts can show reactive atypia
Fibrosis can resemble desmoplasia
Requires careful architectural correlation
Source explicitly cautions that well-differentiated PDAC can be difficult to distinguish from benign glands in chronic pancreatitis.
Slide 47 · Needle biopsy sampling is vulnerable to error
Dense stroma means the sampled tissue may contain relatively few malignant cells.
Well-differentiated malignant glands can resemble reactive epithelium.
Interpret biopsies in clinical and imaging context; Do not assume a sparse sample excludes cancer.
Slide 48 · Perineural invasion: Biologic and clinical relevance
Nerve
Infiltrative tumor glands
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
Pancreatic carcinoma commonly tracks along and invades nerves.
Perineural infiltration is an indicator of invasive growth.
Perineural involvement demonstrates spread beyond ductal epithelium.
Slide 49 · Vascular invasion governs spread and resectability
Vessel
Infiltrative tumor glands
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
The tumor may encase or infiltrate major abdominal vessels.
Vascular invasion contributes to surgical unresectability.
Hematogenous dissemination can lead to distant metastasis.
Slide 50 · Routes of tumor dissemination
Direct local invasion
Lymphatic spread
Blood-borne metastasis
These are parallel potential routes, not necessarily sequential stages.
Slide 51 · Direct extension into neighboring structures
Retroperitoneal extension is common.
The spleen, adrenal glands, stomach and transverse colon may be directly involved.
Local extension can make a small anatomically strategic tumor unresectable.
Slide 52 · Regional lymphatic spread
Peripancreatic nodes are commonly involved.
The source also lists gastric, mesenteric, omental and portohepatic nodal groups.
Lymphatic spread is part of the characteristic invasive phenotype.
Slide 53 · Metastatic targets
Primary pancreatic
Carcinoma
Liver
Lungs
Original editable schematic — not a clinical or histologic specimen
Distant spread occurs chiefly to liver and lungs.
Metastases document spread outside the primary pancreatic site.
Documented distant metastasis makes curative surgery unrealistic.
Slide 54 · Less common histologic variants
Adenosquamous and colloid carcinomas are recognized variants.
Medullary, hepatoid and signet-ring cell patterns are described.
Undifferentiated carcinoma may occur with or without osteoclast-like giant cells.
Slide 55 · Head versus body/tail presentation
HEAD OF PANCREAS
Common bile duct obstruction
Obstructive jaundice may reveal the tumor
Palpable nontender gallbladder can occur
BODY OR TAIL
Often no early biliary obstruction
Can grow substantially before symptoms
May be disseminated at recognition
Anatomic effects help explain presentation; These patterns are not absolute.
Slide 56 · Mechanism of obstructive jaundice
Pancreatic head mass
Distal bile duct obstruction
Upstream ductal distention
Clinical jaundice
The pathway is causal; Jaundice does not prove malignant obstruction.
Slide 57 · Courvoisier sign in pancreatic carcinoma
Describes a palpably enlarged, nontender gallbladder associated with painless jaundice.
It follows distal bile duct obstruction in a compatible clinical setting.
It is a classic clue rather than a definitive test for carcinoma.
Slide 58 · Pain and the silent interval
Pancreatic carcinomas often remain asymptomatic until obstruction or invasion.
Pain is frequently the first symptom.
By the time pain occurs, disease is often beyond curative treatment.
Slide 59 · Why systemic decline accompanies advanced cancer
Advanced tumor burden
Anorexia and metabolic disturbance
Loss of muscle and visceral fat
Cachexia and weakness
Schematic clinical relationship described in the source.
Slide 60 · Trousseau sign: Migratory thrombophlebitis
Migratory, episodic thrombosis can accompany pancreatic carcinoma.
This phenomenon in about 10% of patients.
Cancer-associated procoagulants and platelet-activating factors contribute.
Slide 61 · A symptom cluster requiring investigation
Upper abdominal or back pain, unexplained weight loss and jaundice can coexist.
New-onset diabetes in an older adult may be a separate early clue.
These features are nonspecific and require diagnostic evaluation, not assumed PDAC.
Slide 62 · What different investigations can and cannot do
Modality
Useful role
Key limitation
CT imaging
Assess suspicious mass and disease extent
Not recommended for general-population screening
Endoscopic ultrasound
Investigate suspected pancreatic lesion
Not general-population screening
CA19-9 / CEA
May aid longitudinal response assessment
Inadequate sensitivity/specificity for early screening
Circulating tumor DNA
Potential tumor-derived signal
Insufficient performance for general screening
Slide 63 · CA19-9 is not an early diagnostic solution
Serum CA19-9 may be elevated in pancreatic carcinoma.
Limited sensitivity for early disease and limited specificity for population screening.
It can be useful to follow treatment response in an individual patient.
Slide 64 · Circulating tumor DNA: Promise with limitations
Tumor cells can release DNA fragments into blood.
Detectable ctDNA can reflect tumor biology or burden.
Robbins does not support ctDNA as a stand-alone early-detection screening test.
Slide 65 · Population screening versus high-risk surveillance
AVERAGE-RISK ASYMPTOMATIC
Routine screening is not recommended
False positives and downstream harm are major concerns
No validated general screening strategy in source
INHERITED HIGH RISK
Longitudinal surveillance may be appropriate
Consider germline status and family history
Specialized risk assessment is necessary
Reproduces the textbook framework; Detailed surveillance protocols are not asserted.
Slide 66 · Why resection matters
Advanced disease is usually short-lived after recognition.
A subset who undergo successful resection may survive substantially longer.
Anatomic stage and ability to achieve resection are clinically decisive.
Slide 67 · Link morphology to clinical outcome
Ill-defined invasion
Vessels / nerves / nodes involved
Often unresectable at diagnosis
Poor population survival
Causal overview—not a formal staging or treatment algorithm.
Slide 68 · Case application: Obstructive presentation
Clinical vignette
A 67-year-old develops painless jaundice, a nontender enlarged gallbladder and recent weight loss. Imaging reveals a pancreatic head mass.
Which anatomic mechanism best explains the jaundice?
Discuss the mechanism before revealing the answer in presenter notes.
Slide 69 · Case application: A difficult core biopsy
Clinical vignette
A firm pancreatic mass is sampled. The core contains extensive fibrosis and a few atypical glands; Chronic pancreatitis is in the differential.
Which source-described problem makes histologic interpretation difficult?
Discuss the mechanism before revealing the answer in presenter notes.
Slide 70 · Case application: Inherited susceptibility
Clinical vignette
A newly diagnosed PDAC patient has several close relatives with cancer. Germline testing detects a pathogenic DNA repair gene variant.
What is the added clinical implication beyond the patient’s tumor?
Discuss the mechanism before revealing the answer in presenter notes.
Slide 71 · Case application: Screening biomarkers
Clinical vignette
An asymptomatic, average-risk adult requests a screening blood CA19-9 test because a family acquaintance developed PDAC.
What limitation should be explained?
Discuss the mechanism before revealing the answer in presenter notes.
Slide 72 · Synthesis: Recognize the pathologic phenotype
Infiltrative atypical glands plus intense desmoplasia are defining morphologic features.
Nerve, vessel and peripancreatic tissue invasion reveal the aggressive phenotype.
Head lesions are more likely to obstruct the distal bile duct.
Slide 73 · Synthesis: Connect precursors and mutations
Microscopic PanIN explains most of the proposed precursor sequence.
KRAS activation is early and common; Tumor-suppressor loss is cumulative.
Genetic susceptibility and rare mismatch-repair defects can have family and therapeutic implications.
Slide 74 · Synthesis: Clinical decision points
The prediagnostic interval is often silent.
Markers and imaging are useful in symptomatic workup or monitoring, not mass screening.
Inherited high-risk surveillance and assessment of resectability are distinct priorities.
Slide 75 · Primary reference and visual provenance
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar: Pathologic Basis of Disease
11th edition (2026). Section: The Pancreas.
Illustrations in this lecture are original editable conceptual PowerPoint schematics. No synthetic microscopy, patient images or textbook figures are presented as clinical evidence.