Request PowerPoint
PowerPoint animations are preserved in the original file.
Slide index (64)
- Loading slide titles…
Loading presentation…
Slide text will appear here when the presentation loads.
Swipe on touchscreens · Use ← / → to change slides, Home / End to jump.
Lecture topics
- What this lecture establishes
- Fibroadenoma is the central comparator
- Epithelial-lined clefts create the leaf-like pattern
- Stromal cellularity is a discriminating feature
- Pericanalicular and intracanalicular patterns
- Borderline and malignant tumors recur more often
- Case: A new mass in later adulthood
- Essential clinical discriminators
Slide index & full transcript (64 slides)
Text from the original slides, in presentation order. Diagrams and images remain in the viewer above.
Slide 1 · Phyllodes tumor
Phyllodes Tumor
Breast fibroepithelial neoplasm | pathology lecture
Intralobular stromal origin • morphology • grading • clinical behavior
Dr Abu Suraih Sakhri
MBBS, MD (Pathology)
www.abusuraihsakhri.com
Slide 2 · What this lecture establishes
Four learning outcomes
Recognize the intralobular stromal origin and biphasic structure.
Explain leaf-like architecture and stromal histologic grading.
Differentiate phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma and related stromal lesions.
Connect tumor grade, excision margins, and routes of spread to clinical behavior.
Slide 3 · Breast stromal compartments
Breast stroma
Intralobular
Interlobular
Fibroadenoma + phyllodes
Other mesenchymal lesions
Distinct stromal origins → distinct tumor families
Slide 4 · Intralobular stroma produces biphasic tumors
Neoplastic stromal core
Nonneoplastic epithelial lining
+
Biphasic primary tumor
Proliferative stroma is accompanied by a reactive/nonneoplastic epithelial component.
Slide 5 · Interlobular stroma produces different tumors
Intralobular stroma
Interlobular stroma
Fibroadenoma
Lipoma
Phyllodes tumor
Myofibroblastoma
Biphasic: Stroma and epithelium
Stromal tumors without epithelial component
Slide 6 · Phyllodes is a stromal neoplasm
Neoplastic component
Intralobular stromal cells
Drives tumor architecture and grade
Forms proliferating stromal fronds
Associated component
Nonneoplastic epithelium
Covers stromal projections
Does not constitute the metastatic tumor
Slide 7 · Phyllodes is uncommon among fibroepithelial lesions
≈2.5%
Of breast fibroepithelial lesions
The relevant denominator is fibroepithelial lesions—not all breast neoplasms.
Fibroadenoma is much more common.
Slide 8 · Typical presentation is later than fibroadenoma
Entity
Typical presentation
Fibroadenoma
Women in their 20s and 30s
Phyllodes tumor
Most present in the sixth decade
Age contrast
Phyllodes peak is approximately 10–20 years later
Slide 9 · Clinical discovery: Palpable mass or imaging
Palpable presentation
Most tumors are detected as a mass.
A rapidly enlarging lesion warrants careful pathologic assessment.
Imaging detection
Other lesions are detected at mammography.
Clinical detection alone does not assign tumor grade.
Slide 10 · Tumor size spans a broad spectrum
A few centimeters
Massive lesion involving the entire breast
Size describes the macroscopic presentation; It is not synonymous with histologic grade.
Slide 11 · Fibroadenoma is the central comparator
Core observations
Both lesions arise from intralobular stroma.
Both contain nonneoplastic epithelium.
Both can produce cleft-like spaces and an intracanalicular pattern.
Discrimination depends especially on stromal histologic features.
Slide 12 · MED12 links the two fibroepithelial tumors
Intralobular stromal neoplasms
Fibroadenoma
Phyllodes tumor
Shared association: MED12 and RARA
Additional mutations are more often identified in phyllodes tumors: TERT, TP53, RB.
Slide 13 · MED12 participates in transcriptional control
MED12-encoded mediator subunit
RNA polymerase II transcriptional regulation
Altered stromal growth programs (hypothesis)
Altered hormone-regulated transcription as a possible mechanism, not a proven linear pathway.
Slide 14 · RARA is another shared genetic association
Core observations
RARA encodes retinoic acid receptor α.
RARA mutations with both fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumor.
RARA participates in transcriptional regulation.
A shared finding supports biological relatedness, not identical clinical behavior.
Slide 15 · Additional mutations are more common in phyllodes
Gene
Meaning stated by Robbins
TERT
Encodes telomerase
TP53
Listed among additional mutated genes
RB
Listed among additional mutated genes
Important boundary
Mutations alone do not provide a grading rule here
Slide 16 · Shared genetics does not erase morphologic distinctions
Shared
MED12 and RARA associations
Stromal origin
Biphasic epithelial–stromal composition
Distinctive for phyllodes
Higher propensity for additional gene mutations
Greater stromal cellularity and proliferation
Potential for infiltrative and metastatic behavior
Slide 17 · Gross lesions may contain bulbous protrusions
Core observations
The protrusions reflect nodules of proliferating stroma.
An epithelial covering remains over the stromal projections.
Large lesions may have an exaggerated lobulated or clefted architecture.
Slide 18 · Leaf-like architecture has a structural explanation
Lumen / cystic space
Epithelial lining
Proliferating stromal core
Stromal frond
Epithelial covering
Cleft / luminal space
Original schematic — not a histologic specimen
Slide 19 · Epithelial-lined clefts create the leaf-like pattern
Lumen / cystic space
Epithelial lining
Proliferating stromal core
Stroma pushes toward an open space
A thin epithelial lining remains
Repeated projections generate “leaf-like” contour
Original schematic — not a histologic specimen
Slide 20 · Fronds may extend into cystic spaces
Architecture
Bulbous stromal nodules
Epithelium covers projecting fronds
Projections may enter a cystic lumen
Interpretation
Describes spatial growth pattern
Does not by itself determine whether a tumor is malignant
Slide 21 · Leaf-like growth is not equivalent to malignancy
Finding: Leaf-like projections
Conclusion: Grade must be assessed separately
Comparable protrusions may occasionally occur in large fibroadenomas.
Slide 22 · The epithelium is not the neoplastic driver
Neoplastic stromal core
Nonneoplastic epithelial lining
+
Biphasic primary tumor
Only the stromal component is neoplastic and forms metastases.
Slide 23 · The stromal component determines grading
Examine stromal cells
Assess stromal proliferation and growth
Assign benign / borderline / malignant category
Biphasic architecture identifies the lesion; Stromal histology determines its class.
Slide 24 · Three histologic classes define the spectrum
Benign
Relatively lower stromal cellularity, atypia, and mitotic activity.
Borderline
Greater stromal atypia, cellularity, and mitotic activity than benign tumors.
Malignant
Infiltrative growth; Marked stromal overgrowth can obscure the epithelium.
Classification is based on stromal histology—not the leaf-like name alone.
Slide 25 · Benign phyllodes: Relatively modest atypia
Core observations
May closely resemble fibroadenoma.
Stroma is more cellular and mitotically active than typical fibroadenoma.
Benign cytologic features do not prevent occasional local recurrence.
Slide 26 · Borderline phyllodes: Intermediate stromal changes
Core observations
More conspicuous stromal atypia than in benign phyllodes tumors.
Greater stromal cellularity and mitotic activity.
Higher risk of local recurrence than the benign category.
Slide 27 · Malignant phyllodes: Infiltrative stromal tumor
Core observations
A widely infiltrative growth pattern may be present.
Marked stromal overgrowth can leave few residual epithelial structures.
Under these conditions, distinction from sarcoma is challenging.
Slide 28 · Stromal cellularity is a discriminating feature
Pattern
Relative stromal cellularity
Fibroadenoma
Delicate stroma in common patterns
Benign phyllodes
More cellular than fibroadenoma
Borderline phyllodes
More prominent than benign phyllodes
Malignant phyllodes
Assess alongside infiltration and overgrowth
Slide 29 · Stromal atypia informs the grading continuum
Benign profile: Less prominent atypia
Borderline: More conspicuous atypia
Atypia must be integrated with other stromal features; Robbins does not give numerical nuclear-atypia cutoffs in this section.
Slide 30 · Mitotic activity is evaluated in the stroma
Benign: Increased over fibroadenoma
Borderline: More mitotic activity than benign
This passage describes relative activity; It does not specify exact mitoses-per-area grading thresholds.
Slide 31 · Border infiltration is a malignant feature
Circumscribed example
Infiltrative interface: Schematic
Original schematic — not a histologic specimen
Slide 32 · Stromal overgrowth can obscure biphasic structure
Preserved biphasic pattern
Numerous epithelial-lined clefts
Stromal component remains recognizable
Marked stromal overgrowth
Few remaining epithelial profiles
Resembles a spindle-cell sarcoma
Slide 33 · Grade is a synthesis of multiple features
Feature
Benign
Borderline
Malignant
Cellularity
Mild relative increase
More conspicuous
Evaluate with full pattern
Atypia
Less prominent
More prominent
May be marked
Mitotic activity
Exceeds typical FA
Increased
May be conspicuous
Slide 34 · A characteristic shape cannot replace grading
Core observations
Architectural recognition identifies a phyllodes-like fibroepithelial tumor.
Cellular atypia, stromal cellularity, mitoses, and tumor border complete the assessment.
A large or leaf-like tumor need not be malignant.
Slide 35 · Surgical margin status has prognostic relevance
Tumor grade
Local recurrence
Margin status
Margin status as the most important predictor of local recurrence after excision.
Slide 36 · Fibroadenoma: A useful benign baseline
Growth and border
Usually well-circumscribed gray-white nodule
Delicate, sometimes myxoid stroma
Patent ducts or compressed clefts
Clinical pattern
Peak presentation in 20s–30s
Often multiple or bilateral
Hormonal responsiveness
Slide 37 · Pericanalicular and intracanalicular patterns
Pericanalicular
Intracanalicular
Stroma around patent ducts
Stroma compresses ducts into clefts
Original schematic — not a histologic specimen
Slide 38 · Phyllodes versus fibroadenoma
Dimension
Fibroadenoma
Phyllodes tumor
Stroma of origin
Intralobular
Intralobular
Epithelial component
Nonneoplastic
Nonneoplastic
Stromal cellularity
Usually delicate
Often more cellular
Mitotic activity
Generally less prominent
Greater in benign PT than FA
Typical age
20s–30s
Sixth decade
Behavior
Benign
Benign to malignant spectrum
Slide 39 · Why an intracanalicular pattern can mislead
Core observations
Fibroadenoma can compress ducts into cleft-like spaces.
Phyllodes tumors can display pronounced epithelial-lined leaf-like clefts.
An isolated cleft is insufficient: Examine the associated stromal features.
Slide 40 · Sarcoma enters the differential in high-grade lesions
Typical phyllodes
Biphasic epithelial–stromal tissue
May preserve epithelial-lined clefts
Stromal component drives biologic behavior
Sarcoma-like phyllodes
Marked stromal overgrowth
Few residual epithelial elements
A difficult differential with sarcoma
Slide 41 · Interlobular stromal tumors form a separate group
Core observations
Interlobular tumors lack the accompanying epithelial component.
They include benign mesenchymal lesions and uncommon malignant tumors.
The origin and composition differ from biphasic phyllodes tumor.
Slide 42 · Fibromatosis differs in composition and behavior
Feature
Phyllodes tumor
Breast fibromatosis
Origin
Intralobular stroma
Interlobular stromal lesion
Epithelial component
Present in primary lesion
Absent in tumor
Growth
Variable, may infiltrate
Irregular, infiltrating
Metastasis
Possible in malignant PT
Does not metastasize
Slide 43 · Angiosarcoma is not malignant phyllodes
Phyllodes tumor
Intralobular stromal origin
Biphasic primary tumor
Malignant variant spreads hematogenously
Angiosarcoma
An interlobular stromal malignancy
Vascular malignant neoplasm
May be sporadic or therapy-associated
Slide 44 · The benign category predominates
Up to 75%
Have benign cytologic features (Robbins wording)
These lesions may recur locally.
Benign phyllodes tumors do not metastasize in the source description.
Slide 45 · Benign tumors can still recur locally
Benign histologic features
Possible local recurrence
“Benign” here does not mean that complete local excision is clinically irrelevant.
Slide 46 · Borderline and malignant tumors recur more often
Core observations
Local recurrence increases relative to benign phyllodes tumor.
Tumor grade is relevant, but margin status is the strongest predictor specified.
Avoid conflating local recurrence with distant metastasis.
Slide 47 · Margin status predicts recurrence after excision
Tumor grade
Local recurrence
Margin status
Margin status as the most important predictor of local recurrence after excision.
Slide 48 · Distant spread is hematogenous
Primary phyllodes tumor
Bloodstream
Distant lesion
Metastases contain the neoplastic stroma—not the nonneoplastic breast epithelium.
Slide 49 · Malignant phyllodes can metastasize
≈1/3
Of uncommon malignant lesions develop distant hematogenous metastases
This statement refers to malignant phyllodes tumors—not all phyllodes tumors.
Robbins does not specify a time horizon in the supplied passage.
Slide 50 · Metastatic lesions contain only tumor stroma
Primary lesion
Neoplastic stroma
Nonneoplastic epithelial covering
Classically biphasic
Metastatic deposit
Neoplastic stromal component only
Epithelial component is absent in metastases
Slide 51 · Lymphatic dissemination is rare at every grade
Core observations
Lymphatic spread as rare regardless of grade.
This is mechanistically distinct from hematogenous dissemination.
Do not assume the axillary nodal pathway of ordinary breast carcinoma.
Slide 52 · Routine axillary dissection is contraindicated
Rare lymphatic spread
Do not perform routine axillary lymph node dissection
This point is explicitly stated for phyllodes tumors regardless of grade.
Slide 53 · Clinicopathologic behavior by class
Class
Local recurrence
Distant metastasis
Benign
Occasional
Not described
Borderline
Higher than benign
Not quantified in this passage
Malignant
Higher than benign
Hematogenous; Approximately one-third
Slide 54 · Case: A new mass in later adulthood
Teaching vignette (illustrative, not a real patient)
A woman in her sixth decade presents with a palpable breast mass. Why should phyllodes tumor be included among fibroepithelial possibilities?
Reasoning focus
Age modifies the differential.
The palpable finding alone cannot establish histologic grade.
Slide 55 · Case: Leaf-like fronds with bland stroma
Teaching vignette (illustrative, not a real patient)
An excision shows epithelial-lined leaf-like projections and relatively bland stroma. Does the architecture prove malignancy?
Reasoning focus
Identify the biphasic architecture.
Grade depends on stromal characteristics.
Slide 56 · Case: Increasing stromal atypia and mitoses
Teaching vignette (illustrative, not a real patient)
A fibroepithelial tumor has greater stromal cellularity, atypia and mitotic activity than a benign phyllodes tumor. Which category is suggested?
Reasoning focus
Relative stromal findings point toward borderline disease.
A single feature is not a complete grading algorithm.
Slide 57 · Case: Infiltrative spindle-cell overgrowth
Teaching vignette (illustrative, not a real patient)
A breast mass shows widely infiltrative stromal growth and very few epithelial elements. What diagnostic pitfall emerges?
Reasoning focus
Search for remaining epithelial structures.
Use the full morphologic and clinical context.
Slide 58 · Case: Local recurrence after excision
Teaching vignette (illustrative, not a real patient)
A borderline phyllodes tumor recurs at the excision site. Which reported pathologic factor most strongly predicts this event?
Reasoning focus
Local recurrence and distant spread are separate endpoints.
Record margin status accurately.
Slide 59 · Case: Stromal metastasis without epithelium
Teaching vignette (illustrative, not a real patient)
A distant lesion from a malignant phyllodes tumor contains only spindle-cell stroma. Is absence of epithelium unexpected?
Reasoning focus
Primary tumor is biphasic.
Metastatic component is stromal only.
Slide 60 · Case: Considering an axillary dissection
Teaching vignette (illustrative, not a real patient)
A phyllodes tumor is classified as malignant. Does the grade alone justify routine axillary node dissection?
Reasoning focus
Hematogenous spread is the clinically relevant distant route.
Do not use carcinoma-style nodal assumptions.
Slide 61 · Integrated diagnostic reasoning
Fibroepithelial breast lesion
Identify stromal + epithelial components
Evaluate stromal atypia, cellularity, mitoses, border, overgrowth
Grade → local recurrence / metastatic risk / clinical decisions
Slide 62 · Essential morphologic discriminators
Morphologic criteria, interpreted together
Biphasic lesion with neoplastic stromal component.
Leaf-like stromal fronds covered by nonneoplastic epithelium.
Increasing stromal cellularity, atypia and mitoses refine grade.
Infiltrative borders and stromal overgrowth favor malignancy.
Slide 63 · Essential clinical discriminators
Behavior follows the stromal tumor grade
Typical presentation in the sixth decade.
Benign lesions may recur but do not metastasize’ account.
Margin status strongly predicts local recurrence after excision.
Lymphatic spread is rare; Malignant distant spread is hematogenous.
Slide 64 · References and source boundaries
Primary text
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 11th edition, 2026.
Section: Stromal Tumors — Phyllodes Tumor.
Phyllodes Tumor; Morphology; Clinical Features; Fig. 23.25 caption.
This lecture uses source-based relative grading descriptions; numerical WHO cutoffs were not introduced.