Request PowerPoint
PowerPoint animations are preserved in the original file.
Slide index (68)
- Loading slide titles…
Loading presentation…
Slide text will appear here when the presentation loads.
Swipe on touchscreens · Use ← / → to change slides, Home / End to jump.
Lecture topics
- Scope and terminology
- MYD88 p.L265P: Role and limits
- Patterns beyond a discrete lesion
- Differential: Infectious retinitis
- Interleukin-10 and interleukin-6
- Pathology report: Essential components
- Relapsed disease: Concept and limitations
- Five defensible conclusions
Slide index & full transcript (68 slides)
Text from the original slides, in presentation order. Diagrams and images remain in the viewer above.
Slide 1 · Retinal Lymphoma
Clinicopathologic diagnosis, ocular imaging and CNS implications
Dr Abu Suraih Sakhri
MBBS, MD (Pathology)
www.abusuraihsakhri.com
Slide 2 · Learning objectives
Localize neoplastic infiltrates to vitreous, neural retina and retinal pigment epithelium.
Recognize the clinical masquerade and select a diagnostic specimen.
Integrate cytology, immunophenotyping and molecular evidence with CNS evaluation.
Interpret contemporary treatment and follow-up principles without overclaiming evidence.
Slide 3 · Scope and terminology
Retinal lymphoma
Aggressive intraocular B-cell neoplasm
Predilection for neurosensory retina and RPE
Characteristically associated with brain disease
Contemporary clinical designation
Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL)
Predominantly large B-cell lymphoma
Within the primary CNS lymphoma spectrum
Slide 4 · The eye as a CNS-associated compartment
Neurosensory retina
Retinal pigment epithelium
Vitreous sampling
CNS evaluation
The anatomic localization of ocular lesions guides sampling and staging; These steps are not a biological lineage.
Schematic
Slide 5 · Retinal layers relevant to lymphoma
Vitreous cavity
Neurosensory retina
Retinal pigment epithelium
Bruch membrane
Choroid
PVRL commonly involves vitreous, retina and the RPE interface; Choroidal lymphoma occupies a different anatomic compartment.
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 6 · Why the RPE interface matters
Lesions at or above the RPE
Sub-RPE deposits and retinal infiltrates
OCT: RPE nodularity or outer retinal signal
Supports the vitreoretinal pattern
Lesions deep to Bruch membrane
Primarily choroidal distribution
Different imaging contour/depth
Suggests a choroidal process in the differential
Slide 7 · Retinal lymphoma is not retinoblastoma
Retinal lymphoma
Typically older adult
Large B-cell hematolymphoid neoplasm
Common CNS association
Vitreous cytology often key
Retinoblastoma
Typically young child
Retinal embryonal neoplasm
RB1 pathway relevant
Retinal mass with rosettes in some tumors
Slide 8 · Age and host context
PVRL classically presents in older adults, but age alone never determines the diagnosis.
Immunocompromised patients warrant evaluation for CNS/ocular lymphoma and infectious mimics.
A prolonged “uveitis” history does not exclude malignancy.
Do not use patient age or steroid responsiveness as a substitute for tissue diagnosis.
Slide 9 · Histologic identity: Large B-cell lymphoma
Clonal mature B-cell proliferation
Large atypical lymphoid cells
Diffuse large B-cell morphology
Ocular/CNS clinical phenotype
Most cases are large B-cell lymphomas; Uncommon non–B-cell intraocular lymphomas require separate classification.
Schematic
Slide 10 · Lymphoma phenotype is not defined by one stain
Lineage markers such as CD20, PAX5 and CD79a support B-cell differentiation.
CD3 highlights accompanying T cells and helps assess reactive components.
An integrated morphology–immunophenotype–molecular interpretation is required.
Marker expression is supportive; Histologic subtype is a composite diagnosis.
Slide 11 · Molecular context: B-cell receptor signaling
MYD88 / CD79B activating alterations
BCR / innate immune signaling
NF-κB-associated survival signaling
Clonal B-cell persistence
Conceptual pathway only. Mutations are common in PVRL, but not present in every case and not sufficient alone for diagnosis.
Schematic
Slide 12 · MYD88 p.L265P: Role and limits
What a positive assay adds
Supports an ocular B-cell lymphoma
Useful on paucicellular specimens
May complement cytology and clonality
What it does not establish
Not positive in all confirmed cases
Does not independently localize tumor
Must be interpreted in the clinical context
Slide 13 · CNS connection defines the clinical stakes
Ocular presentation
Brain MRI and clinical assessment
Current CNS disease?
Longitudinal CNS vigilance
PVRL can precede, accompany or follow CNS lymphoma; The time sequence varies by patient.
Schematic
Slide 14 · The optic nerve as a route of extension
Neurosensory retina
Optic nerve head
Optic nerve
Intracranial visual pathway
Brain
Possible spread to the brain along the optic nerve; Clinical CNS disease can also reflect the broader PCNSL spectrum.
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 15 · Possible clinical trajectories
Ocular disease only at presentation
Ocular + CNS involvement
Brain involvement during follow-up
Alternative patterns are shown, not a deterministic progression for every patient.
Schematic
Slide 16 · Early symptoms are nonspecific
Floaters and painless blurred vision are characteristic presenting complaints.
Symptoms may fluctuate despite persistent neoplastic disease.
Unilateral symptoms do not exclude bilateral involvement on careful examination.
Persistent unexplained floaters plus posterior segment inflammation warrant a malignancy-aware differential.
Slide 17 · A classic masquerade: Chronic uveitis
Features that resemble uveitis
Vitreous cells and haze
Blurred vision and floaters
Variable retinal inflammation-like lesions
Features that raise suspicion
Older patient with atypical course
Relapsing or treatment-resistant disease
Creamy outer retinal/RPE infiltrates
Limited macular edema despite vitritis
Slide 18 · Corticosteroids can obscure the diagnosis
Empirical corticosteroid exposure
Transient clinical improvement
Reduced or altered tumor-cell yield
Potential diagnostic delay
Consensus recommends withholding systemic corticosteroids before diagnostic vitrectomy when clinically feasible; Coordinate this decision with treating specialists.
Schematic
Slide 19 · Slit-lamp observations
Vitreous cells may appear in sheets, clusters or dense haze.
Anterior segment inflammation may be relatively modest compared with vitreous infiltration.
Evaluate both eyes; Absence of striking retinal lesions does not exclude lymphoma.
A normal-appearing fundus through dense vitritis is not reassuring.
Slide 20 · Fundus: Creamy retinal and subretinal lesions
Creamy or yellow-white lesions
RPE mottling or focal atrophy
Retinal or sub-RPE infiltration
Imaging and biopsy correlation
Findings are suggestive rather than pathognomonic; Avoid diagnosing lymphoma solely from fundus color.
Schematic
Slide 21 · Patterns beyond a discrete lesion
Optic disc edema, perivascular changes and serous retinal detachment may occur.
RPE pigment disturbance can persist after an active infiltrate resolves.
Retinitis-like presentations require exclusion of infection and other mimics.
Document anatomic distribution, not just the presence of “white spots”.
Slide 22 · Multimodal imaging has complementary roles
Modality
Primary information
Key limitation
Color fundus
Vitreous haze; Lesion distribution
Subtle lesions may be missed
OCT
Layer and sub-RPE localization
Imaging is not tissue proof
FAF
RPE metabolic disturbance
Signal varies with activity/damage
Angiography
Staining, blockage, leakage
Findings are nonspecific
Slide 23 · OCT: Anatomic localization
Inner retina
Outer retina
Subretinal space
RPE
Bruch membrane
Hyperreflective material may involve outer retina, subretinal space, or the sub-RPE interface. This drawing is schematic, not an OCT scan.
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 24 · OCT signs that increase suspicion
Nodular elevation or irregularity of the retinal pigment epithelium.
Outer retinal hyperreflective foci and subretinal infiltrative material.
Vitreous cellular echoes and occasional pigment epithelial detachment.
Interpret OCT in combination with fundoscopy, FAF and clinical context.
Slide 25 · Vertical hyperreflective columns
Localized retinal infiltrative focus
Vertical hyperreflective OCT signal
Possible microscopic tumor infiltration
Correlate with other modalities
Proposed association, not a stand-alone diagnostic sign; Exact mechanism remains inferential.
Schematic
Slide 26 · Fundus autofluorescence patterns
Hyperautofluorescence
May accompany active sub-RPE lesions
Related to disturbed RPE function
Often paired with OCT nodularity
Hypoautofluorescence
May reflect masking by infiltrate
Can follow RPE atrophy or injury
Does not alone establish inactivity
Slide 27 · Fluorescein angiography: What it adds
Granular or mottled RPE-level fluorescence changes may be seen.
Blocking and late staining can coexist at different lesion sites.
Angiography assesses morphology and activity but cannot classify lymphoid cells.
If imaging and clinical course remain suspicious, tissue-based evaluation is still necessary.
Slide 28 · An imaging finding is not a tumor diagnosis
Imaging can
Locate abnormalities by retinal layer
Map burden and possible response
Select an accessible biopsy target
Imaging cannot
Establish B-cell clonality alone
Replace cytologic/molecular analysis
Prove absence of microscopic disease
Slide 29 · Differential: Inflammatory posterior uveitis
Question
Inflammatory uveitis
PVRL concern
Course
Often follows recognized syndrome
Chronic atypical or relapsing
Vitreous
Inflammatory cells
Clumped atypical cells possible
Retina
Inflammatory/chorioretinal lesions
Creamy infiltrates / RPE deposits
Next step
Cause-directed tests
Ocular biopsy if unexplained
Slide 30 · Differential: Infectious retinitis
Infectious considerations
Herpetic necrotizing retinitis
Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis
Opportunistic infection in at-risk hosts
Why lymphoma remains in the differential
Retinitis-like lesions may occur
Nonresponse despite adequate antimicrobial therapy
Negative pathogen evaluation with atypical course
Slide 31 · Differential: Choroidal lymphoma
Neural retina
RPE
Bruch membrane
Choroidal stroma
Sclera
A primarily choroidal lymphoma is centered below Bruch membrane; PVRL often occupies retinal and sub-RPE compartments.
Schematic (not histology)
Slide 32 · Differentiate primary from secondary ocular disease
Lymphoma identified in ocular specimen
Review systemic lymphoma history
MRI brain / CNS evaluation
Systemic staging as indicated
Assign clinical disease context
PVRL is used for eye-predominant disease in the PCNSL spectrum after appropriate evaluation; Secondary intraocular involvement is a separate context.
Schematic
Slide 33 · When to proceed to diagnostic vitrectomy
Sustained suspicion persists despite noninvasive evaluation and appropriate differential testing.
Sampling should be planned with ophthalmology and an experienced cytopathology laboratory.
Specimen volume, priorities, transport conditions and ancillary tests should be agreed before surgery.
A vitrectomy intended for diagnosis is a coordinated tissue-acquisition procedure.
Slide 34 · The diagnostic specimen is fragile
Vitrectomy planning
Fresh undiluted vitreous allocation
Immediate cytology processing
Ancillary testing in parallel
Neoplastic cells can degenerate quickly; Fixation and handling must follow local ocular-cytopathology protocols.
Schematic
Slide 35 · Vitreous cytology: Hallmark morphology
Large atypical lymphoid cells with irregular nuclear contours and prominent nucleoli.
Variable cytoplasmic volume, apoptosis and background necrotic debris may be present.
Reactive small lymphocytes and macrophages can obscure sparse malignant cells.
The diagnosis is morphological and multimodal; This slide does not substitute for a real cytology image.
Slide 36 · Why diagnostic yield may be low
Low neoplastic cellularity
Prior steroid exposure or apoptosis
Cell degeneration during handling
Nondiagnostic cytology
False-negative vitreous cytology does not exclude lymphoma when clinical suspicion remains high.
Schematic
Slide 37 · The core immunocytochemical panel
Marker
Interpretive use
Caution
CD20 / PAX5
B-cell lineage
Expression can vary
CD3
Reactive T-cell component
Not equivalent to tumor lineage
CD79a
Additional B-lineage support
Integrate with phenotype
Ki-67
Proliferation pattern
Not independently diagnostic
Slide 38 · Typical immunophenotypic pattern
Many tumors express B-cell markers with MUM1/IRF4 and other activated B-cell–associated features.
BCL2 and BCL6 may be expressed; CD10 is often absent.
There is no single immunophenotypic profile that replaces integrated classification.
Phenotypic expectations should guide, not dictate, interpretation of an individual small specimen.
Slide 39 · Flow cytometry: Strength and limitation
Strengths
Detects aberrant B-cell populations
Can assess light-chain restriction
Phenotypes multiple markers in parallel
Limitations
Needs viable, adequate cellular material
May miss sparse or fragile tumor cells
Clonality alone is not whole diagnosis
Slide 40 · Interleukin-10 and interleukin-6
Collect ocular fluid appropriately
Measure IL-10 and IL-6
High IL-10 / IL-6 ratio supports suspicion
Correlate with tumor cells and other testing
An IL-10:IL-6 ratio >1 is a consensus-supported indicator, not independently definitive proof.
Schematic
Slide 41 · Interpret a cytokine-positive sample carefully
Reasonable conclusion
Lymphoma becomes more likely
Prioritize morphology and clonality
Reassess imaging and CNS staging
Unwarranted conclusion
Ratio alone proves malignancy
Specimen handling is irrelevant
Negative cytology can be ignored
Slide 42 · MYD88 mutation testing
Targeted detection of MYD88 p.L265P can reinforce suspicion for PVRL.
The mutation is absent from a meaningful subset of confirmed cases.
Positive testing should be integrated with morphology, lineage and presentation.
A negative result is not a rule-out test; Mutation positivity alone is not sufficient.
Slide 43 · Immunoglobulin gene rearrangements
Ocular specimen DNA
IGH / IGK clonality assay
Dominant rearrangement detected?
Interpret alongside cytology and phenotype
A clonality result supports an expanded population but must be evaluated against small-sample artifacts and biologic context.
Schematic
Slide 44 · Evidence integration rather than one-test diagnosis
Evidence level
Contribution
Interpretation
Direct malignant cytology
Morphologic evidence
Central to diagnosis
B-cell phenotype / clonality
Establish lineage and restricted clone
Strong corroboration
MYD88 / cytokines
Supportive molecular / soluble markers
Not sufficient in isolation
Imaging / clinical pattern
Localization and suspicion
Guides sampling
Slide 45 · When a vitreous biopsy is negative
Re-evaluate specimen adequacy
Review imaging and differential
Reconsider corticosteroid effect
Repeat/alternative ocular sampling if warranted
Continue CNS surveillance
Decisions require a multidisciplinary risk–benefit assessment; Do not declare lymphoma excluded on one negative sample.
Schematic
Slide 46 · Retinal/subretinal tissue biopsy
May be considered when vitreous testing is nondiagnostic and accessible retinal lesions persist.
Targets should correspond to the demonstrated site of disease.
Retinal biopsy has procedural risks and requires specialist planning.
Biopsy site and tissue allocation are clinical decisions, not automatic next steps.
Slide 47 · CNS evaluation is part of the diagnosis
Confirmed or strongly suspected PVRL
Contrast-enhanced brain MRI
Neurologic review ± CSF assessment
Neuro-oncology/hematology coordination
A normal initial MRI does not eliminate the need for subsequent surveillance.
Schematic
Slide 48 · Why systemic staging still matters
Primary vitreoretinal pattern
Ocular disease within PCNSL spectrum
No demonstrated systemic primary after assessment
CNS risk remains central
Secondary ocular lymphoma
Ocular infiltration by systemic lymphoma
Different staging and therapeutic context
Requires systemic disease evaluation
Slide 49 · Pathology report: Essential components
Specimen type, preservation and diagnostic adequacy.
Atypical-cell morphology, B-cell markers and cytologic interpretation.
Ancillary test results with assay-specific limitations.
Integrated diagnosis and recommendation for clinicoradiologic correlation.
Slide 50 · Clinical decision-making is multidisciplinary
Retina / uveitis specialist
Ocular cytopathology
Hematology / neuro-oncology
Neuroradiology
Individualized integrated plan
Eye control and CNS disease prevention/control are related but distinct clinical goals.
Schematic
Slide 51 · Treatment goals
Ocular objectives
Regress vitreoretinal infiltration
Preserve visual function
Monitor local relapse
Systemic / CNS objectives
Treat or prevent CNS progression when feasible
Address current CNS involvement
Balance toxicity against fitness
Slide 52 · Systemic therapy: 2024 guideline emphasis
EHA–ESMO recommends high-dose methotrexate–based induction for fit patients with PVRL.
Regimen selection parallels primary CNS lymphoma and depends on systemic fitness.
Evidence is limited by disease rarity; Recommendations include expert consensus.
Treatment choices should follow specialist multidisciplinary assessment, not a generic fixed regimen.
Slide 53 · Local ocular treatment
Modality
Clinical intent
Important trade-off
Intravitreal methotrexate
Rapid local tumor control
Injection burden / ocular toxicity
Intravitreal rituximab
Local CD20-targeted therapy
Limited comparative evidence
Ocular radiotherapy
Local consolidation / control
Potential late ocular toxicity
Slide 54 · Local control is not CNS assurance
Visible vitreoretinal response
Improved ocular appearance
CNS involvement may still emerge
Continue neuro-oncology follow-up
An apparently quiet eye does not establish systemic or CNS remission.
Schematic
Slide 55 · Treatment must reflect patient fitness
Fit for intensive systemic treatment
HD-MTX-based induction in guidelines
Consolidation discussed individually
Ocular treatment added when appropriate
Frailty or contraindications
Local treatment may play larger role
Alternative systemic approaches considered
Toxicity and visual goals prioritized
Slide 56 · Assessing response
Assessment
What it can track
Why it is insufficient alone
Slit lamp / fundus
Vitreous cells and visible lesions
Microscopic persistence possible
OCT / FAF
Retinal structure and RPE change
Damage may remain after control
MRI brain
Parenchymal CNS involvement
Does not replace ocular exam
Aqueous biomarkers
Potential molecular activity
Standardization varies
Slide 57 · Relapse and follow-up
Ocular and CNS disease require coordinated follow-up even after apparent response.
New floaters, reduced vision or new neurologic symptoms merit prompt reassessment.
Repeat imaging, biomarkers and tissue testing may be indicated depending on context.
Follow-up intervals and modalities are individualized; No single universal timetable is implied.
Slide 58 · Relapsed disease: Concept and limitations
Define local versus CNS recurrence
Review prior therapies and toxicity
Re-stage disease extent
Consider systemic salvage / selected local options
Guideline salvage choices depend on performance status, prior regimens and CNS involvement; Efficacy evidence remains heterogeneous.
Schematic
Slide 59 · Case A: An apparent posterior uveitis
A 71-year-old has 9 months of floaters, blurred vision, fluctuating vitreous haze, and recurrent “uveitis” after corticosteroids. OCT shows nodular RPE changes.
What is the highest-value next diagnostic action?
Arrange a planned diagnostic vitrectomy with ocular cytology and ancillary testing, while initiating CNS assessment. Treatable infections still require consideration.
Slide 60 · Case A: Dissect the decision
Finding
Interpretation
Action
Older adult + recurrent vitritis
Masquerade phenotype
Keep PVRL on differential
RPE nodularity
Anatomic clue
Guide multimodal imaging
Temporary steroid response
Not exclusionary
Plan appropriate sampling
CNS association
Potential systemic consequence
MRI and referral
Slide 61 · Case B: A nondiagnostic aspirate
A patient with multifocal creamy retinal lesions has nondiagnostic vitreous cytology. OCT remains suspicious. An ocular-fluid MYD88 assay is negative.
Does this exclude vitreoretinal lymphoma?
No. Reassess sample quality, previous treatment, imaging and mimics; Consider repeat or targeted retinal sampling after multidisciplinary review.
Slide 62 · Case B: Interpret discordant tests
What is known
Clinical localization remains suspicious
One ocular specimen lacked diagnostic cells
MYD88 assay did not detect the mutation
What remains unresolved
Whether tumor cells were sampled
Whether another subtype/molecular profile is present
Which specimen has best next yield
Slide 63 · Case C: Ocular control with later CNS lesion
After treatment, fundus lesions regress and vision stabilizes. Several months later, the patient develops new focal neurologic symptoms.
What is the most important clinical inference?
Ocular improvement does not exclude CNS lymphoma. Urgent neurological assessment and brain imaging are required.
Slide 64 · What the original textbook establishes
Primary retinal lymphoma targets neurosensory retina and RPE.
It usually presents in older individuals and can mimic uveitis.
Most cases are diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Brain involvement is frequent; Vitreous aspirate demonstrates malignant cells.
Slide 65 · What specialist literature adds
Diagnostic refinement
OCT / FAF and layer-specific signs
Coordinated vitrectomy specimen triage
MYD88, cytokines and clonality as adjuncts
Clinical management refinement
MRI and systemic context
Individualized CNS-directed / ocular therapy
Structured recurrence surveillance
Slide 66 · Diagnostic synthesis
Persistent suspicious vitritis / retinal infiltrates
Multimodal retinal localization
Planned ocular biopsy with integrated pathology
CNS evaluation and multidisciplinary care
Consider infection, inflammatory disease and alternative ocular lymphoma throughout the pathway.
Schematic
Slide 67 · Five defensible conclusions
Atypical “uveitis” may be an ocular presentation of large B-cell lymphoma.
The vitreous–retina–RPE distribution helps direct imaging and biopsy.
Cytology is central; Immunophenotype and molecular tests increase confidence.
Negative sampling does not automatically exclude the disease.
CNS evaluation and prolonged coordinated follow-up are integral.
Slide 68 · References and source hierarchy
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 11th ed. 2026. Ch 29, p 1206.
Ferreri AJM et al. EHA–ESMO guideline for primary CNS lymphomas. HemaSphere. 2024;8:e89.
Carbonell D et al. Diagnostic consensus. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2021;29:507–520.
Xu LT et al. Multimodal imaging in PVRL. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2022;8:58.
Diagnostic methods for PVRL: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2024;69:456–464.
WHO Classification of Tumours of the Eye and Orbit, 5th edition — summary in Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2023.