Request PowerPoint
PowerPoint animations are preserved in the original file.
Slide index (69)
- Loading slide titles…
Loading presentation…
Slide text will appear here when the presentation loads.
Swipe on touchscreens · Use ← / → to change slides, Home / End to jump.
Lecture topics
- Autoimmune disease requires more than an allele
- PD-1 provides another inhibitory signal
- How to read an odds ratio without overclaiming
- HLA associations: Multiple sclerosis and SLE
- PTPN22: A proposed route to lymphocyte hyperactivation
- IRF5 and IFIH1 link susceptibility to type I interferon
- Distinct genetic pathways in autoimmune susceptibility
- Primary reference
Slide index & full transcript (69 slides)
Text from the original slides, in presentation order. Diagrams and images remain in the viewer above.
Slide 1 · Role of Susceptibility Genes
Genetic architecture of autoimmune susceptibility
HLA associations · Immune regulation · Host–microbe defense
Dr Abu Suraih Sakhri
MBBS, MD (Pathology)
www.abusuraihsakhri.com
Slide 2 · Learning objectives
Explain why common autoimmune diseases are generally multigenic rather than single-gene disorders.
Interpret HLA association data without confusing susceptibility with disease causation.
Connect non-HLA risk loci to lymphocyte signaling, self-tolerance, and microbial sensing.
Distinguish common susceptibility variants from rare single-gene immune dysregulation.
Integrate genetic background with environmental triggers in pathogenesis.
Slide 3 · Autoimmune disease requires more than an allele
Inherited susceptibility
HLA and non-HLA variants
Immune regulation
Central and peripheral tolerance
Environmental context
Infection, inflammation or tissue injury
Pathologic expression
Self-reactive lymphocyte activation and tissue injury
The contributors interact; Inherited variation does not cause environmental exposure.
Slide 4 · Most autoimmune disorders have complex genetic architecture
Inherited susceptibility usually reflects multiple genetic loci acting together.
Risk alleles may be present in healthy individuals; Clinical expression is not inevitable.
Risk loci involve antigen presentation, lymphocyte control, and host responses to microbes.
Common polygenic disease must be distinguished from rare monogenic immune dysregulation.
Slide 5 · Twin studies support a genetic contribution
Evidence from twin studies
Affected individuals’ twins have higher autoimmune disease incidence than the general population.
Concordance is greater in monozygotic than dizygotic twins.
Shared inherited factors therefore contribute to susceptibility.
Limits of that evidence
Twin concordance is not perfect.
Non-genetic influences also matter.
Concordance supports heritability—not a specific causal gene.
The direction of the twin findings here, not an exact concordance percentage.
Slide 6 · Genetic association is not genetic destiny
A susceptibility allele increases disease odds; It does not establish that disease will occur.
The HLA-B27 example is especially instructive: Most carriers never develop ankylosing spondylitis.
Slide 7 · Sources of genetic evidence
Twins and families
Heritable contribution to a phenotype
HLA associations
Alleles associated with immune-mediated disease
Genome-wide association
Common non-MHC susceptibility polymorphisms
Rare human mutations
Loss of individual regulatory pathways
Knockout mouse models
Experimental tests of immune control
Mechanistic studies
Potential pathway connecting variant and disease
An association, a mechanism, and a monogenic disease are different kinds of evidence.
Slide 8 · How loss of self-tolerance produces autoimmunity
Self-reactive lymphocyte
Autoreactivity can arise during receptor generation
Control failure
Deletion, anergy, suppression, or apoptosis is inadequate
Activation
Stimulus permits self-directed effector response
Tissue injury
Antibody and/or T-cell-mediated damage
Risk genes can alter control points in this chain; Environmental stimuli can provide the activating context.
Slide 9 · Central and peripheral tolerance target different stages
Central tolerance
Thymus for developing T cells; Bone marrow for developing B cells.
Deletion of strongly autoreactive clones.
B-cell receptor editing; Thymic regulatory T-cell development.
Peripheral tolerance
Acts on mature lymphocytes after central selection.
Anergy and inhibitory receptor signaling.
Regulatory T-cell suppression and activation-induced apoptosis.
These are parent mechanisms required to understand why some susceptibility genes matter.
Slide 10 · AIRE connects gene expression with central tolerance
Thymic AIRE
Expression of peripheral tissue antigens
Self-antigen display
Developing T cells encounter self
Negative selection
Autoreactive T-cell clones eliminated
Loss-of-function AIRE mutations impair central tolerance and can cause autoimmune polyendocrine disease.
Slide 11 · CTLA-4 restrains peripheral T-cell activation
APC costimulation
B7 costimulator displayed
CTLA-4 activity
Regulatory T cells remove B7 from APCs
Reduced stimulation
Self-reactive T-cell activation restrained
CTLA4 is both a disease-associated susceptibility gene and a rare monogenic checkpoint defect.
Slide 12 · PD-1 provides another inhibitory signal
PD-1 receptor
On responding T cells
Ligand engagement
PD-L1 / PD-L2 bind PD-1
Inhibitory signaling
T-cell activation limited
PD-1 deficiency as mechanistic evidence that immune inhibitory pathways prevent systemic inflammation.
Slide 13 · IL-2 and CD25 sustain regulatory T-cell control
IL-2
T-cell growth and survival signal
CD25 / IL-2Rα
Receptor component on regulatory T cells
Treg maintenance
Suppression of self-reactive responses
IL2RA polymorphisms may change the balance of regulatory and effector T-cell activity.
Slide 14 · Fas–FasL signaling deletes activated autoreactive cells
Self-antigen recognition
Mature T-cell activation
Fas binds FasL
Death receptor pathway engaged
Apoptosis
Potentially self-reactive cells removed
Disruption of FAS or FASL can lead to autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS).
Slide 15 · Three categories of genetic involvement
HLA / MHC alleles
Variation in the antigen-presenting context
Non-HLA common variants
Variation in immune regulation and microbial defense
Rare single-gene disorders
Direct failure of a defined tolerance checkpoint
The first two account for much of common polygenic risk; The third demonstrates causal pathways.
Slide 16 · HLA genes are major autoimmune susceptibility loci
HLA associations are among the strongest genetic associations in autoimmune disease.
Class I and class II alleles are associated with different disease phenotypes.
Variation in peptide presentation is a plausible mechanism for several associations.
The strength of an association differs across loci, diseases, and populations.
Slide 17 · HLA class I and class II: Distinct contexts
Class I association
HLA-B27 is the striking example in ankylosing spondylitis.
Class I HLA associates with a major increase in disease odds.
The allele is not sufficient to produce disease.
Class II association
Multiple autoimmune diseases show class II HLA associations.
HLA-DR and HLA-DQ alleles feature in the Robbins table.
Certain molecules may preferentially present self or modified-self peptides.
Do not infer that all HLA associations act through the same proved molecular mechanism.
Slide 18 · Antigen presentation links HLA with T-cell recognition
Self-peptide context
Natural or modified self peptide
HLA molecule displays peptide
Autoreactive T cell may respond
Disease context
Relevant HLA allele inherited
Tolerance / regulation is inadequate
Inflammatory activation occurs
Schematic causal possibilities; Individual allele–disease mechanisms vary in certainty.
Slide 19 · The proposed HLA mechanism: Selective peptide display
An HLA molecule binds and displays a subset of available peptides.
Disease-associated alleles may preferentially present natural or modified self peptides.
Certain such associations have mechanistic support, including in rheumatoid arthritis.
Preferential peptide presentation is a disease-specific hypothesis—not a universal proof.
Slide 20 · Association, mechanism, and causation are not synonyms
What an HLA association shows
An allele occurs more frequently among people with a disease.
The estimated odds differ between carrier and noncarrier groups.
It supports inherited susceptibility.
What it does not establish
That every carrier will develop disease.
That the precise biologic pathway is known.
That the allele is sufficient or always required.
Risk alleles modify probabilities; Do not equate them with diagnostic criteria.
Slide 21 · HLA-B27: An exceptional association
Ankylosing spondylitis is associated with HLA-B27 at an approximate odds ratio of 100–200.
This source estimate comes from populations of European ancestry and does not provide absolute risk.
Slide 22 · How to read an odds ratio without overclaiming
OR = 1
No association on the odds scale
OR > 1
Higher disease odds in allele carriers
Absolute risk
Requires the underlying disease frequency
A large odds ratio is not the proportion of carriers who will develop disease.
Slide 23 · Clinical reasoning: HLA-B27 carrier
A healthy adult is incidentally found to carry HLA-B27. They have no history or findings suggestive of ankylosing spondylitis.
Reasoning prompt
What does the carrier result establish about susceptibility?
Can the allele alone establish ankylosing spondylitis?
Why is a 100–200 odds ratio compatible with many healthy carriers?
Slide 24 · Why most HLA-B27 carriers remain unaffected
Carrying HLA-B27 is neither equivalent to having disease nor sufficient for disease development.
Other inherited factors and environmental/immune contexts modify expression.
The high odds ratio expresses a relative association, not a personal prognosis.
A disease diagnosis requires evidence beyond a susceptibility genotype.
Slide 25 · Rheumatoid arthritis: HLA-DRB1 shared epitope
The associated susceptibility alleles share a DRB1 sequence motif at positions 70–74.
Robbins Table 6.7 reports associations specifically for anti-CCP–positive rheumatoid arthritis.
Slide 26 · Shared-epitope alleles in rheumatoid arthritis
One shared-epitope allele
Table 6.7: Approximate odds ratio 4.
DRB1 shared-epitope region: Amino acid positions 70–74.
Estimate applies to anti-CCP–positive rheumatoid arthritis.
Two shared-epitope alleles
Table 6.7: Approximate odds ratio 12.
A stronger genotype association is shown.
These are not direct estimates of penetrance.
Anti-CCP denotes antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides.
Slide 27 · HLA associations in anti-CCP–positive rheumatoid arthritis
Disease / phenotype
HLA genotype or haplotype
Approx. OR
RA, anti-CCP positive
DRB1: One shared-epitope allele
4
RA, anti-CCP positive
DRB1: Two shared-epitope alleles
12
Approximate odds ratios reported Table 6.7; European-derived populations.
Slide 28 · Modified-self peptides can connect genotype to autoimmunity
Self protein
Posttranslational modification may occur
Peptide presentation
Some HLA molecules preferentially bind modified self
T-cell activation
Autoimmune response can be promoted
This pathway is an explanatory possibility highlighted for rheumatoid arthritis; It is not inferred from an OR alone.
Slide 29 · Type 1 diabetes: Class II HLA haplotypes
Disease / phenotype
HLA genotype or haplotype
Approx. OR
Type 1 diabetes
DRB1*0301–DQA1*0501–DQB1*0201
4
Type 1 diabetes
DRB1*0401–DQA1*0301–DQB1*0302
8
Type 1 diabetes
DRB1*0301/0401 heterozygotes
35
Distinct haplotype/genotype categories as reported; Not an individual absolute-risk calculator.
Slide 30 · The type 1 diabetes example is genotype dependent
Multiple HLA-DR/DQ haplotypes are associated with increased disease odds.
The table lists a different association for the DRB1*0301/0401 heterozygous genotype.
Genotype combinations cannot be reduced to the effect of one isolated allele.
This does not mean that HLA genotyping alone diagnoses type 1 diabetes.
Slide 31 · HLA associations: Multiple sclerosis and SLE
Disease / phenotype
HLA genotype or haplotype
Approx. OR
Multiple sclerosis
DRB1*1501
3
Systemic lupus erythematosus
DRB1*0301
2
Systemic lupus erythematosus
DRB1*1501
1.3
Approximate odds ratios; Small differences in the table should not be overinterpreted.
Slide 32 · Celiac disease: HLA-DQ association
Disease / phenotype
HLA genotype or haplotype
Approx. OR
Celiac disease
DQA1*0501–DQB1*0201 haplotype
7
Presence of the susceptibility haplotype does not itself establish celiac disease.
Slide 33 · Selected HLA–disease associations at a glance
Disease
Associated HLA category
Approx. OR
Ankylosing spondylitis
HLA-B27
100–200
Anti-CCP+ rheumatoid arthritis
DRB1: One / two shared epitopes
4 / 12
Type 1 diabetes
Listed DR/DQ combinations
4 / 8 / 35
Multiple sclerosis
DRB1*1501
3
Systemic lupus erythematosus
DRB1*0301 / *1501
2 / 1.3
Celiac disease
DQA1*0501–DQB1*0201
7
Source: Robbins Table 6.7; The odds ratios are approximate and population-specific.
Slide 34 · Interpreting Table 6.7: Four essential cautions
The reported odds ratios are approximate, not universal constants.
Table values are drawn from European-derived populations.
Association strength differs by phenotype definition; Rheumatoid arthritis is anti-CCP positive in the table.
An odds ratio cannot be translated to absolute risk without baseline disease probability.
Slide 35 · HLA allele vs haplotype vs genotype
Allele or motif
HLA-B27 denotes a class I allele family.
A DRB1 shared-epitope susceptibility motif spans positions 70–74.
Alleles specify sequence-level variation.
Haplotype or combination
Certain DRB1–DQA1–DQB1 combinations are tabulated for type 1 diabetes.
DRB1*0301/0401 heterozygotes form a distinct category.
Do not apply an OR from one genetic category to another.
Slide 36 · Common non-HLA polymorphisms modify disease susceptibility
Family studies and genome-wide association studies reveal many non-MHC loci.
Some loci are disease-associated; Others recur across multiple autoimmune disorders.
The encoded proteins often regulate lymphocyte responses, tolerance, or microbial defense.
A statistical association does not independently resolve variant function or causal direction.
Slide 37 · From association signal to candidate mechanism
GWAS / family association
Risk-associated locus identified
Molecular localization
Coding or gene-regulatory region
Pathway hypothesis
Protein abundance or immune activity altered
Disease susceptibility
A change in probability, not certainty
The source emphasizes that many implicated polymorphisms lie in regulatory DNA.
Slide 38 · Noncoding regulatory variants vs coding variants
Regulatory polymorphism
Often located in promoters or enhancers.
May change the abundance, timing, or cellular location of gene expression.
Most non-MHC associations discussed are of this broad type.
Protein-coding variant
May change the sequence or function of an encoded protein.
A plausible altered protein function still requires evidence.
The source does not assign a molecular mechanism to every individual allele.
The regulatory-versus-coding distinction is a source-grounded generalization, not a claim about every locus.
Slide 39 · The main non-HLA pathways in the source
Lymphocyte signaling
PTPN22
Regulatory T-cell maintenance
IL2RA / CD25; CTLA4
Th17 differentiation
IL23R
Microbial detection
NOD2
Autophagy / barrier integrity
ATG16L1
Type I interferon responses
IRF5 and IFIH1
These are selected examples Table 6.8, not a comprehensive genetic atlas.
Slide 40 · PTPN22 encodes a protein tyrosine phosphatase
The proposed function involves restraining lymphocyte tyrosine-kinase signaling.
Disease-associated variants are postulated to permit excessive lymphocyte activation.
Slide 41 · PTPN22: A proposed route to lymphocyte hyperactivation
PTPN22 variant
Reduced negative control, as hypothesized
Tyrosine kinases
More prolonged or excessive signaling
Lymphocytes
Increased activation potential
Robbins frames the mechanism as a postulate, not an experimentally settled mechanism for every allele.
Slide 42 · PTPN22 has pleiotropic autoimmune associations
Associations include rheumatoid arthritis and type 1 diabetes.
Table 6.8 additionally includes inflammatory bowel disease.
The same risk locus appears in phenotypically different disorders.
This supports the concept of shared immune regulatory pathways.
Slide 43 · IL2RA variants may alter the effector–Treg balance
IL2RA / CD25
IL-2 receptor α-chain
Changed IL-2 responses
Expression or signaling may differ
Immune balance
Effector and regulatory T cells affected
Reported associations include type 1 diabetes and multiple sclerosis.
Slide 44 · CD25 in disease association and immune tolerance
Normal biologic role
CD25 is part of the IL-2 receptor.
IL-2 is required to maintain functional regulatory T cells.
Regulatory T cells restrain autoreactive lymphocytes.
Disease hypothesis
IL2RA regulatory variants may alter receptor expression.
A changed effector–regulatory balance can modify susceptibility.
Specific consequences depend on the variant and context.
Slide 45 · CTLA4: Common variation and rare defects
Common association
CTLA4 variants are associated with type 1 diabetes and RA
Normal checkpoint
CTLA-4 restrains B7-mediated costimulation
Rare deficiency
Loss of checkpoint can cause systemic immune dysregulation
Independent lines of evidence support this pathway; Common alleles are not equivalent to knockouts.
Slide 46 · IL23R connects susceptibility with Th17 differentiation
IL23R
Receptor for IL-23
CD4 T-cell program
Influences pathogenic Th17 effector differentiation
Inflammatory disease
Associations with IBD, psoriasis and AS
Robbins Table 6.8 proposes an effect on Th17 differentiation; Allele-specific functional changes are not detailed.
Slide 47 · NOD2 senses microbes in the intestinal setting
NOD2 belongs to the intracellular NLR family of microbial sensors.
It is expressed in intestinal epithelial cells, including Paneth cells, and other cells.
NOD2 variants associate with Crohn disease, especially in some ethnic populations.
This illustrates that susceptibility loci can affect barrier–microbe interactions.
Slide 48 · NOD2: Proposed defect in commensal sensing
NOD2 risk variant
Impaired gut microbial recognition (hypothesis)
Barrier–microbe interface
Entry of commensals may increase
Inflammatory response
Persistent response to ordinarily tolerated microbes
The proposed chain is not established for every NOD2-associated patient; Crohn disease is not simply a classic organ-specific autoantibody disorder.
Slide 49 · ATG16L1 links autophagy to intestinal defense
ATG16L1
Autophagy-related gene
Potential functions
Microbial defense and epithelial barrier maintenance
Inflammation
Association with inflammatory bowel disease
The textbook table states a possible role; It does not establish a universal mechanism.
Slide 50 · IRF5 and IFIH1 link susceptibility to type I interferon
IRF5 / IFIH1
Immune sensing and transcriptional pathways
Type I interferon
Associated with cytokine response
SLE susceptibility
Type I interferon is involved in lupus pathogenesis
A source-derived putative pathway; Gene-specific causal alleles are not specified in Table 6.8.
Slide 51 · Non-HLA risk loci: Immune regulation
Gene
Associated diseases
Putative biologic role
PTPN22
RA; T1D; IBD
Lymphocyte signaling / negative control
IL23R
IBD; Psoriasis; AS
IL-23 signaling; Th17 differentiation
CTLA4
T1D; RA
T-cell inhibition / regulatory T-cell effects
IL2RA
MS; T1D
IL-2 signaling; Treg and effector balance
Associations and putative functions are derived Table 6.8.
Slide 52 · Non-HLA risk loci: Response to microbes
Gene
Associated diseases
Proposed function
NOD2
IBD
Cytoplasmic bacterial sensor in gut epithelium
ATG16L1
IBD
Autophagy, microbial defense and epithelial barrier
IRF5; IFIH1
SLE
Type I interferon production / regulation
Inflammatory bowel disease encompasses more than conventional adaptive autoimmunity.
Slide 53 · Two broad classes of non-HLA susceptibility loci
Immune response / tolerance
PTPN22: Lymphocyte kinase signaling.
CTLA4 and IL2RA: Inhibition and Treg homeostasis.
IL23R: Effector T-cell differentiation.
Host–microbe / innate pathways
NOD2: Intracellular microbial recognition.
ATG16L1: Autophagy and intestinal barrier function.
IRF5 and IFIH1: Type I interferon response.
Biological category is not an exclusive cell-type classification.
Slide 54 · Rare single-gene disorders explain immune checkpoints
Knockout experiments and inherited human mutations reveal specific tolerance pathways.
AIRE, CTLA4, PD1, FAS, FASL, IL2, and CD25 among these checkpoints.
Such mutations can produce severe immune dysregulation.
They do not explain most common multigenic autoimmune diseases.
Slide 55 · AIRE deficiency and polyendocrine autoimmunity
Normal AIRE-dependent step
Expression of tissue-restricted self antigens within thymic selection.
Self-reactive developing T cells can encounter those antigens.
Negative selection removes some dangerous clones.
AIRE loss of function
Reduced central display of some self antigens.
Impaired elimination of relevant autoreactive T cells.
Rare autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome may result.
Slide 56 · FOXP3 deficiency illustrates regulatory T-cell failure
FOXP3
Required for functional regulatory T cells
Defective Treg function
Reduced suppression of self-reactive immunity
IPEX
Severe X-linked immune dysregulation
IPEX is an adjacent tolerance example, not a common risk polymorphism listed in Table 6.8.
Slide 57 · FAS / FASL mutations impair lymphocyte deletion
Fas / FasL pathway
Activation-related death signal
Reduced apoptosis
Autoreactive lymphocytes persist
ALPS phenotype
Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome
A direct rare-pathway example rather than a common autoimmune susceptibility allele.
Slide 58 · B-cell IgG Fc receptor supplies negative feedback
Immune complex
IgG bound to antigen
B-cell Fc receptor
Feedback inhibits further antibody production
Receptor knockout
Autoimmunity may develop in experimental models
This pathway is cited in the subsection as experimental evidence of B-cell immune regulation.
Slide 59 · Common susceptibility variants are not null mutations
Polygenic susceptibility
Modest-to-large statistical associations are possible.
Most carriers do not necessarily express disease.
Often noncoding regulatory variants across many loci.
Rare monogenic dysregulation
Defined genetic lesion can disrupt a critical immune pathway.
Provides unusually direct evidence of checkpoint function.
Not responsible for most common autoimmune conditions.
A common association is not evidence of a complete protein knockout.
Slide 60 · Distinct genetic pathways in autoimmune susceptibility
Antigen presentation
HLA class I and class II
Central tolerance
AIRE-dependent thymic selection
Peripheral inhibition
CTLA4, PD-1 and Fas pathways
Effector signaling
PTPN22 and IL23R
Regulatory T cells
IL2RA / CD25 and FOXP3
Innate / barrier defense
NOD2, ATG16L1, IRF5 and IFIH1
These are parallel and interacting mechanisms, not a linear gene-to-gene signaling chain.
Slide 61 · Case: Anti-CCP–positive rheumatoid arthritis
Two people with anti-CCP–positive rheumatoid arthritis have different DRB1 shared-epitope allele counts. The textbook table reports odds ratios of approximately 4 and 12 for the corresponding categories.
Reasoning prompt
What type of association is being compared?
Does the difference show that one patient must have more severe disease?
Can these values alone predict the course of established arthritis?
Slide 62 · Case: Crohn disease and NOD2 susceptibility
A study reports enrichment of a NOD2 polymorphism among people with Crohn disease in a particular ancestry group.
Reasoning prompt
Which innate immune function is implicated by Robbins?
What proposed mechanism might connect microbial recognition to intestinal inflammation?
Which conclusions would require direct functional or clinical data?
Slide 63 · Case: IL2RA association across diseases
An IL2RA regulatory-region polymorphism is associated with type 1 diabetes and multiple sclerosis in genetic studies.
Reasoning prompt
What protein does IL2RA encode?
Which cell population may be especially sensitive to disturbed IL-2 signaling?
Why does a shared locus not imply identical disease pathogenesis?
Slide 64 · Genetic finding: What can be concluded?
HLA-B27 detected
Increased susceptibility to AS; Not a diagnosis
PTPN22 association
A plausible immune-regulatory locus
Rare AIRE loss of function
Can disrupt thymic central tolerance
IL2RA promoter variant
Potential altered IL-2 responsiveness
NOD2 risk polymorphism
Crohn association with contextual mechanism
FAS disruption
Loss of an apoptotic tolerance pathway
Genotype interpretation must match the strength and type of source evidence.
Slide 65 · Five interpretation pitfalls to avoid
Confusing odds ratios with an individual’s probability of disease.
Applying population-specific association estimates to all ancestry groups.
Assuming that HLA carriage is sufficient for a clinical diagnosis.
Treating postulated non-HLA mechanisms as established for every variant.
Using rare knockout phenotypes as models of the magnitude of common-variant effects.
Slide 66 · Susceptibility is expressed through gene–environment interplay
Inherited background
HLA and immune-regulatory variants
Environmental stimuli
Infection, tissue injury and inflammation
Tolerance control
Autoreactive lymphocytes may be restrained or activated
Disease expression
Only a subset of susceptible people develop tissue injury
Risk genes and exposures interact; Neither factor is an isolated sufficient cause.
Slide 67 · Synthesis: What susceptibility genes teach us
HLA associations highlight the importance of antigen presentation.
Non-HLA polymorphisms identify immune regulatory, effector, and innate pathways.
Rare monogenic disorders demonstrate why defined tolerance checkpoints matter.
Disease expression remains probabilistic and depends on additional biologic context.
Slide 68 · Core terminology for accurate genetic interpretation
Term
Meaning in this lecture
Susceptibility allele
Inherited variant associated with altered disease odds
Haplotype
Combination of linked alleles considered together
Shared epitope
Susceptibility-associated motif in HLA-DRB1 positions 70–74
GWAS
Genome-wide association study of genotype–phenotype patterns
Regulatory polymorphism
Variation potentially affecting gene expression
Monogenic immune defect
Rare mutation directly impairing a defined tolerance pathway
Definitions are intended for interpreting the Robbins evidence, not for genetic counseling.
Slide 69 · Primary reference
Robbins, Cotran & Kumar: Pathologic Basis of Disease
11th edition · Elsevier · 2026.